Redistributing Rewards Across Time and Agents for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.04864v2
• Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 10:11:05 GMT
• Title: Redistributing Rewards Across Time and Agents for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
• Authors: Aditya Kapoor, Kale-ab Tessera, Mayank Baranwal, Harshad Khadilkar, Jan Peters, Stefano Albrecht, Mingfei Sun,
• Abstract summary: Credit assignmen, disentangling each agent's contribution to a shared reward, is a critical challenge in cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning.<n>We introduce Temporal-Agent Reward Redistribution (TAR$2$), an approach that decouples credit modeling from this constraint.<n>We demonstrate that this method is equivalent to a valid Potential-Based Reward Shaping (PBRS), which guarantees the optimal policy is preserved regardless of model accuracy.
• Score: 14.852334980733369
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Credit assignmen, disentangling each agent's contribution to a shared reward, is a critical challenge in cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL). To be effective, credit assignment methods must preserve the environment's optimal policy. Some recent approaches attempt this by enforcing return equivalence, where the sum of distributed rewards must equal the team reward. However, their guarantees are conditional on a learned model's regression accuracy, making them unreliable in practice. We introduce Temporal-Agent Reward Redistribution (TAR$^2$), an approach that decouples credit modeling from this constraint. A neural network learns unnormalized contribution scores, while a separate, deterministic normalization step enforces return equivalence by construction. We demonstrate that this method is equivalent to a valid Potential-Based Reward Shaping (PBRS), which guarantees the optimal policy is preserved regardless of model accuracy. Empirically, on challenging SMACLite and Google Research Football (GRF) benchmarks, TAR$^2$ accelerates learning and achieves higher final performance than strong baselines. These results establish our method as an effective solution for the agent-temporal credit assignment problem.

Related papers

• ArenaRL: Scaling RL for Open-Ended Agents via Tournament-based Relative Ranking [84.07076200941474]
  ArenaRL is a reinforcement learning paradigm that shifts from pointwise scalar scoring to intra-group relative ranking.<n>We construct an intra-group adversarial arena and devise a tournament-based ranking scheme to obtain stable advantage signals.<n>Experiments show that ArenaRL substantially outperforms standard RL baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-10T08:43:07Z)
• Confidence as a Reward: Transforming LLMs into Reward Models [54.98336080630691]
  Confidence-as-a-Reward (CRew) is a training-free method that utilizes token-level confidence in the model's final answers as a proxy for reward.<n>We show that CRew outperforms existing training-free reward approaches on the MATH500 and RewardMATH benchmarks.<n>We propose CRew-DPO, a training strategy that constructs preference data from confidence scores combined with correctness signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T12:51:47Z)
• Agentic Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Step Rewards [92.26560379363492]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly developed as autonomous agents using reinforcement learning (agentic RL)<n>We introduce implicit step rewards for agentic RL (iStar), a general credit-assignment strategy that integrates seamlessly with standard RL algorithms.<n>We evaluate our method on three challenging agent benchmarks, including WebShop and VisualSokoban, as well as open-ended social interactions with unverifiable rewards in SOTOPIA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T16:15:42Z)
• FlowRL: Matching Reward Distributions for LLM Reasoning [69.88820066093798]
  We propose FlowRL: matching the full reward distribution via flow balancing instead of maximizing rewards in large language model (LLM) reinforcement learning (RL)<n>We transform scalar rewards into a normalized target distribution using a learnable partition function, and then minimize the reverse KL divergence between the policy and the target distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-18T17:56:36Z)
• Discriminative Policy Optimization for Token-Level Reward Models [55.98642069903191]
  Process reward models (PRMs) provide more nuanced supervision compared to outcome reward models (ORMs)<n>Q-RM explicitly learns token-level Q-functions from preference data without relying on fine-grained annotations.<n>Reinforcement learning with Q-RM significantly enhances training efficiency, achieving convergence 12 times faster than ORM on GSM8K and 11 times faster than step-level PRM on MATH.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T11:40:34Z)
• Accelerating RL for LLM Reasoning with Optimal Advantage Regression [52.0792918455501]
  We propose a novel two-stage policy optimization framework that directly approximates the optimal advantage function.<n>$A$*-PO achieves competitive performance across a wide range of mathematical reasoning benchmarks.<n>It reduces training time by up to 2$times$ and peak memory usage by over 30% compared to PPO, GRPO, and REBEL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T03:58:50Z)
• Runaway is Ashamed, But Helpful: On the Early-Exit Behavior of Large Language Model-based Agents in Embodied Environments [55.044159987218436]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong planning and decision-making capabilities in complex embodied environments.<n>We take a first step toward exploring the early-exit behavior for LLM-based agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T08:23:36Z)
• Enhancing Diversity in Parallel Agents: A Maximum State Entropy Exploration Story [40.82741665804367]
  We introduce a novel learning framework that maximizes the entropy of collected data in a parallel setting.<n>Our approach carefully balances the entropy of individual agents with inter-agent diversity, effectively minimizing redundancies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-02T15:08:17Z)
• Agent-Temporal Credit Assignment for Optimal Policy Preservation in Sparse Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [14.003793644193605]
  In multi-agent environments, agents often struggle to learn optimal policies due to sparse or delayed global rewards.<n>We introduce Temporal-Agent Reward Redistribution (TAR$2$), a novel approach designed to address the agent-temporal credit assignment problem.<n> TAR$2$ decomposes sparse global rewards into time-step-specific rewards and calculates agent-specific contributions to these rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T12:05:13Z)
• VinePPO: Unlocking RL Potential For LLM Reasoning Through Refined Credit Assignment [66.80143024475635]
  We propose VinePPO, a straightforward approach to compute unbiased Monte Carlo-based estimates. We show that VinePPO consistently outperforms PPO and other RL-free baselines across MATH and GSM8K datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T15:49:30Z)
• Towards Fast Rates for Federated and Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning [34.34798425737858]
  We propose Fast-FedPG, a novel federated policy algorithm with a carefully designed bias-correction mechanism. Under a gradient-domination condition, we prove that our algorithm guarantees (i) fast linear convergence with exact gradients, and (ii) sub-linear rates that enjoy a linear speedup w.r.t. the number of agents with noisy, truncated policy gradients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-09T02:59:17Z)
• Towards Global Optimality for Practical Average Reward Reinforcement Learning without Mixing Time Oracles [83.85151306138007]
  Multi-level Actor-Critic (MAC) framework incorporates a Multi-level Monte-Carlo (MLMC) estimator. We demonstrate that MAC outperforms the existing state-of-the-art policy gradient-based method for average reward settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T16:23:47Z)
• Reinforcement Learning from Bagged Reward [46.16904382582698]
  In Reinforcement Learning (RL), it is commonly assumed that an immediate reward signal is generated for each action taken by the agent. In many real-world scenarios, designing immediate reward signals is difficult. We propose a novel reward redistribution method equipped with a bidirectional attention mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T07:26:44Z)
• Handling Cost and Constraints with Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning [2.793095554369282]
  Most popular methods for off-policy learning include policy improvement steps where a learned state-action ($Q$) value function is maximized over selected batches of data. We revisit this strategy in environments with "mixed-sign" reward functions. We find that this second approach, when applied to continuous action spaces with mixed-sign rewards, consistently and significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods augmented by resetting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T16:31:04Z)
• STAS: Spatial-Temporal Return Decomposition for Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning [10.102447181869005]
  We introduce a novel method that learns credit assignment in both temporal and spatial dimensions. Our results demonstrate that our method effectively assigns spatial-temporal credit, outperforming all state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-15T10:09:03Z)
• Learning From Good Trajectories in Offline Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [98.07495732562654]
  offline multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) aims to learn effective multi-agent policies from pre-collected datasets. One agent learned by offline MARL often inherits this random policy, jeopardizing the performance of the entire team. We propose a novel framework called Shared Individual Trajectories (SIT) to address this problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-28T18:11:26Z)
• Distributional Reward Estimation for Effective Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning [19.788336796981685]
  We propose a novel Distributional Reward Estimation framework for effective Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (DRE-MARL) Our main idea is to design the multi-action-branch reward estimation and policy-weighted reward aggregation for stabilized training. The superiority of the DRE-MARL is demonstrated using benchmark multi-agent scenarios, compared with the SOTA baselines in terms of both effectiveness and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T08:31:45Z)
• Reinforcement Learning in Reward-Mixing MDPs [74.41782017817808]
  episodic reinforcement learning in a reward-mixing Markov decision process (MDP) cdot S2 A2)$ episodes, where $H$ is time-horizon and $S, A$ are the number of states and actions respectively. epsilon$-optimal policy after exploring $tildeO(poly(H,epsilon-1) cdot S2 A2)$ episodes, where $H$ is time-horizon and $S, A$ are the number of states and actions respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-07T18:55:49Z)
• ERMAS: Becoming Robust to Reward Function Sim-to-Real Gaps in Multi-Agent Simulations [110.72725220033983]
  Epsilon-Robust Multi-Agent Simulation (ERMAS) is a framework for learning AI policies that are robust to such multiagent sim-to-real gaps. ERMAS learns tax policies that are robust to changes in agent risk aversion, improving social welfare by up to 15% in complextemporal simulations. In particular, ERMAS learns tax policies that are robust to changes in agent risk aversion, improving social welfare by up to 15% in complextemporal simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-10T04:32:20Z)
• DDPG++: Striving for Simplicity in Continuous-control Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning [95.60782037764928]
  We show that simple Deterministic Policy Gradient works remarkably well as long as the overestimation bias is controlled. Second, we pinpoint training instabilities, typical of off-policy algorithms, to the greedy policy update step. Third, we show that ideas in the propensity estimation literature can be used to importance-sample transitions from replay buffer and update policy to prevent deterioration of performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T20:21:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.