Probabilistic Subspace Manifolds for Contextual Inference in Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.05346v1
- Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 21:32:32 GMT
- Title: Probabilistic Subspace Manifolds for Contextual Inference in Large Language Models
- Authors: Christopher Nightingale, Dominic Lavington, Jonathan Thistlethwaite, Sebastian Penhaligon, Thomas Belinski, David Boldo,
- Abstract summary: Representing token embeddings as probability distributions allows for more flexible contextual inference.
Probability embeddings improve neighborhood consistency and decrease redundancy.
Probability embeddings preserve contextual integrity even under robustness-based evaluation scenarios.
- Score: 0.0
- License:
- Abstract: Representing token embeddings as probability distributions over learned manifolds allows for more flexible contextual inference, reducing representational rigidity while enhancing semantic granularity. Comparative evaluations demonstrate that probabilistic embeddings improve neighborhood consistency and decrease redundancy, ensuring that token relationships remain more structurally coherent across fine-tuning iterations. The integration of probabilistic subspaces within attention mechanisms facilitates more adaptive contextual weighting, enabling models to capture latent dependencies that would otherwise be obscured in conventional embeddings. Experimental results highlight increased robustness against adversarial modifications, with probabilistic embeddings preserving contextual integrity even under perturbation-based evaluation scenarios. Performance assessments indicate that probabilistic representations achieve greater adaptability in domain-specific applications, mitigating the need for extensive retraining when shifting across linguistic domains. Computational trade-offs remain within operationally feasible limits, with marginal increases in inference latency balanced against the benefits of enhanced representation stability and contextual expressiveness. The capacity to encode structured uncertainty provides advantages in generative modeling tasks, particularly where maintaining coherence across extended sequences requires a representation framework capable of handling ambiguous or context-dependent linguistic constructs.
Related papers
- Probabilistic Lexical Manifold Construction in Large Language Models via Hierarchical Vector Field Interpolation [0.0]
The proposed methodology constructs a probabilistic function space where word representations adhere to topological consistency.
Probability constraints enhance lexical coherence by refining contextual relationships, leading to improvements in semantic stability across multiple linguistic distributions.
An assessment of computational efficiency reveals that while representations introduces minor processing overhead, the structured representation learning approach remains scalable for practical deployment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-14T08:47:10Z) - Latent Structure Modulation in Large Language Models Through Stochastic Concept Embedding Transitions [0.0]
embedding transitions introduce a probabilistic mechanism for adjusting token representations dynamically during inference.
A transition framework was proposed in which each token embedding evolved through probabilistic updates.
Empirical evaluations demonstrated greater lexical diversity, improved generative coherence, and enhanced retention of low-frequency vocabulary.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-08T12:53:52Z) - Hierarchical Contextual Manifold Alignment for Structuring Latent Representations in Large Language Models [7.798982346197703]
The organization of latent token representations plays a crucial role in determining the stability, generalization, and contextual consistency of language models.
A hierarchical alignment method was introduced to token embeddings without altering core model weights.
Experimental evaluations demonstrated improvements in rare token retrieval, adversarial, and long-range dependency tracking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-06T04:01:27Z) - Latent Lexical Projection in Large Language Models: A Novel Approach to Implicit Representation Refinement [0.0]
Latent Lexical Projection (LLP) is introduced to refine lexical representations through a structured transformation into a latent space.
LLP integrates an optimized projection mechanism within an existing language model architecture.
Evaluations indicate a reduction in perplexity and an increase in BLEU scores, suggesting improvements in predictive accuracy and fluency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-03T23:18:53Z) - Contextual Morphogenesis in Large Language Models: A Novel Approach to Self-Organizing Token Representations [0.0]
contextual morphogenesis establishes a self-organizing mechanism that restructures token boundaries based on learned contextual dependencies.
Empirical evaluations demonstrate that dynamically adjusted tokenization contributes to reductions in perplexity while maintaining representational stability.
Comparative assessments across different linguistic corpora suggest that adaptive tokenization preserves interpretability while improving alignment with contextual cues.
The effectiveness of contextual morphogenesis in refining structural stability and predictive performance highlights its viability as an alternative to traditional tokenization methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-01T03:50:46Z) - Structural Entropy Guided Probabilistic Coding [52.01765333755793]
We propose a novel structural entropy-guided probabilistic coding model, named SEPC.
We incorporate the relationship between latent variables into the optimization by proposing a structural entropy regularization loss.
Experimental results across 12 natural language understanding tasks, including both classification and regression tasks, demonstrate the superior performance of SEPC.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-12T00:37:53Z) - Improving Network Interpretability via Explanation Consistency Evaluation [56.14036428778861]
We propose a framework that acquires more explainable activation heatmaps and simultaneously increase the model performance.
Specifically, our framework introduces a new metric, i.e., explanation consistency, to reweight the training samples adaptively in model learning.
Our framework then promotes the model learning by paying closer attention to those training samples with a high difference in explanations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-08T17:20:08Z) - Rigorous Probabilistic Guarantees for Robust Counterfactual Explanations [80.86128012438834]
We show for the first time that computing the robustness of counterfactuals with respect to plausible model shifts is NP-complete.
We propose a novel probabilistic approach which is able to provide tight estimates of robustness with strong guarantees.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-10T09:13:11Z) - Advancing Counterfactual Inference through Nonlinear Quantile Regression [77.28323341329461]
We propose a framework for efficient and effective counterfactual inference implemented with neural networks.
The proposed approach enhances the capacity to generalize estimated counterfactual outcomes to unseen data.
Empirical results conducted on multiple datasets offer compelling support for our theoretical assertions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-09T08:30:51Z) - Rationale-Augmented Ensembles in Language Models [53.45015291520658]
We reconsider rationale-augmented prompting for few-shot in-context learning.
We identify rationale sampling in the output space as the key component to robustly improve performance.
We demonstrate that rationale-augmented ensembles achieve more accurate and interpretable results than existing prompting approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-02T06:20:57Z) - Distributional Robustness and Regularization in Reinforcement Learning [62.23012916708608]
We introduce a new regularizer for empirical value functions and show that it lower bounds the Wasserstein distributionally robust value function.
It suggests using regularization as a practical tool for dealing with $textitexternal uncertainty$ in reinforcement learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-05T19:56:23Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.