A Novel Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm for Counterfactual Generation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.10418v1
- Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2025 15:50:59 GMT
- Title: A Novel Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm for Counterfactual Generation
- Abstract summary: Machine learning algorithms learn black-box predictive models (which cannot be directly interpreted)<n>It is important that users understand the predictions of such models, particularly when the model outputs a negative prediction for the user.<n>Counterfactual explanations provide users with guidance on how to change some of their characteristics to receive a different, positive classification.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Machine learning algorithms that learn black-box predictive models (which cannot be directly interpreted) are increasingly used to make predictions affecting the lives of people. It is important that users understand the predictions of such models, particularly when the model outputs a negative prediction for the user (e.g. denying a loan). Counterfactual explanations provide users with guidance on how to change some of their characteristics to receive a different, positive classification by a predictive model. For example, if a predictive model rejected a loan application from a user, a counterfactual explanation might state: If your salary was {\pounds}50,000 (rather than your current {\pounds}35,000), then your loan would be approved. This paper proposes two novel contributions: (a) a novel multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm (EA) for counterfactual generation based on lexicographic optimisation, rather than the more popular Pareto dominance approach; and (b) an extension to the definition of the objective of validity for a counterfactual, based on measuring the resilience of a counterfactual to violations of monotonicity constraints which are intuitively expected by users; e.g., intuitively, the probability of a loan application to be approved would monotonically increase with an increase in the salary of the applicant. Experiments involving 15 experimental settings (3 types of black box models times 5 datasets) have shown that the proposed lexicographic optimisation-based EA is very competitive with an existing Pareto dominance-based EA; and the proposed extension of the validity objective has led to a substantial increase in the validity of the counterfactuals generated by the proposed EA.
Related papers
- AVCG: A Generalized Variational Framework for Counterfactual Generation under Hypothesis Distributions [41.99844472131922]
Counterfactual explanations "what-if" scenarios by identifying modifications to an input instance that obtain a desired alternative prediction.<n>Traditionally, these approaches rely on a single, deterministic point-estimate predictor.<n>We propose the Amortized Variational Counterfactual Generator (AVCG), a generalized framework that formalizes counterfactual generation as optimization over an arbitrary hypothesis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-07T19:30:09Z) - Tabular Foundation Models for Discrete Choice Estimation [8.167439804974467]
Tabular foundation models (TFMs) generate predictions on structured data via in-context learning, without task-specific estimation.<n>We ask whether TFMs can be effectively applied to discrete choice, a central demand estimation framework in marketing and operations.<n>We propose a reformulation that encodes both choice-set dependence and individual heterogeneity within a row-based learning framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-14T22:34:00Z) - Adaptive Querying with AI Persona Priors [12.151167766756108]
We study adaptive querying for learning user-dependent quantities of interest.<n>We introduce a persona-induced latent variable model that represents a user's state through membership in a finite dictionary of AI personas.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-01T14:34:25Z) - Adaptive Conformal Prediction for Improving Factuality of Generations by Large Language Models [86.8650252164764]
Large language models (LLMs) are prone to generating factually incorrect outputs.<n>We propose an adaptive conformal prediction approach that extends conformal score transformation methods to LLMs.<n>This enables prompt-dependent calibration, retaining marginal coverage guarantees while improving conditional coverage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-15T15:35:42Z) - Verifiable Reasoning for LLM-based Generative Recommendation [106.7765000777685]
Reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs) has recently shown strong potential in enhancing generative recommendation.<n>We propose a novel textbftextitreason-verify-recommend paradigm, which interleaves reasoning with verification to provide reliable feedback.<n>Experiments on four real-world datasets demonstrate that VRec substantially enhances recommendation effectiveness and scalability without compromising efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-08T16:55:45Z) - Identifying counterfactual probabilities using bivariate distributions and uplift modeling [1.519321208145928]
Uplift modeling estimates the causal effect of an intervention as the difference between potential outcomes under treatment and control.<n>Counterfactual identification aims to recover the joint distribution of these potential outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-09T16:59:38Z) - Next-Token Prediction Should be Ambiguity-Sensitive: A Meta-Learning Perspective [12.655285605773932]
We show that Transformers indeed struggle with high-ambiguity predictions across model sizes.<n>Preliminary results show substantial gains in ambiguous contexts through improved capacity allocation and test-time scalable inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-19T13:05:12Z) - I Predict Therefore I Am: Is Next Token Prediction Enough to Learn Human-Interpretable Concepts from Data? [76.15163242945813]
Large language models (LLMs) have led many to conclude that they exhibit a form of intelligence.<n>We introduce a novel generative model that generates tokens on the basis of human-interpretable concepts represented as latent discrete variables.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-12T01:21:17Z) - Graph-Structured Speculative Decoding [52.94367724136063]
Speculative decoding has emerged as a promising technique to accelerate the inference of Large Language Models.
We introduce an innovative approach utilizing a directed acyclic graph (DAG) to manage the drafted hypotheses.
We observe a remarkable speedup of 1.73$times$ to 1.96$times$, significantly surpassing standard speculative decoding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-23T06:21:24Z) - Improving Fairness in Credit Lending Models using Subgroup Threshold Optimization [0.0]
We introduce a new fairness technique called textitSubgroup Threshold (textitSTO)
STO works by optimizing the classification thresholds for individual subgroups in order to minimize the overall discrimination score between them.
Our experiments on a real-world credit lending dataset show that STO can reduce gender discrimination by over 90%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-15T19:36:56Z) - Predictive Churn with the Set of Good Models [64.05949860750235]
We study the effect of conflicting predictions over the set of near-optimal machine learning models.
We present theoretical results on the expected churn between models within the Rashomon set.
We show how our approach can be used to better anticipate, reduce, and avoid churn in consumer-facing applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-12T16:15:25Z) - Source-Free Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Hypothesis Consolidation
of Prediction Rationale [53.152460508207184]
Source-Free Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (SFUDA) is a challenging task where a model needs to be adapted to a new domain without access to target domain labels or source domain data.
This paper proposes a novel approach that considers multiple prediction hypotheses for each sample and investigates the rationale behind each hypothesis.
To achieve the optimal performance, we propose a three-step adaptation process: model pre-adaptation, hypothesis consolidation, and semi-supervised learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-02T05:53:22Z) - Advancing Counterfactual Inference through Nonlinear Quantile Regression [77.28323341329461]
We propose a framework for efficient and effective counterfactual inference implemented with neural networks.
The proposed approach enhances the capacity to generalize estimated counterfactual outcomes to unseen data.
Empirical results conducted on multiple datasets offer compelling support for our theoretical assertions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-09T08:30:51Z) - Black-Box Anomaly Attribution [13.455748795087493]
When a black-box machine learning model deviates from the true observation, what can be said about the reason behind that deviation?
This is a fundamental and ubiquitous question that the end user in a business or industrial AI application often asks.
We propose a novel likelihood-based attribution framework we call the likelihood compensation''
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-29T01:42:32Z) - VCNet: A self-explaining model for realistic counterfactual generation [52.77024349608834]
Counterfactual explanation is a class of methods to make local explanations of machine learning decisions.
We present VCNet-Variational Counter Net, a model architecture that combines a predictor and a counterfactual generator.
We show that VCNet is able to both generate predictions, and to generate counterfactual explanations without having to solve another minimisation problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-21T08:45:32Z) - Exploring the Trade-off between Plausibility, Change Intensity and
Adversarial Power in Counterfactual Explanations using Multi-objective
Optimization [73.89239820192894]
We argue that automated counterfactual generation should regard several aspects of the produced adversarial instances.
We present a novel framework for the generation of counterfactual examples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-20T15:02:53Z) - Regularizing Variational Autoencoder with Diversity and Uncertainty
Awareness [61.827054365139645]
Variational Autoencoder (VAE) approximates the posterior of latent variables based on amortized variational inference.
We propose an alternative model, DU-VAE, for learning a more Diverse and less Uncertain latent space.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-24T07:58:13Z) - Backward-Compatible Prediction Updates: A Probabilistic Approach [12.049279991559091]
We formalize the Prediction Update Problem and present an efficient probabilistic approach as answer to the above questions.
In extensive experiments on standard classification benchmark data sets, we show that our method outperforms alternative strategies for backward-compatible prediction updates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-02T13:05:31Z) - Estimation with Uncertainty via Conditional Generative Adversarial
Networks [3.829070379776576]
We propose a predictive probabilistic neural network model, which corresponds to a different manner of using the generator in conditional Generative Adversarial Network (cGAN)
By reversing the input and output of ordinary cGAN, the model can be successfully used as a predictive model.
In addition, to measure the uncertainty of predictions, we introduce the entropy and relative entropy for regression problems and classification problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-01T08:54:17Z) - Adversarial Likelihood-Free Inference on Black-Box Generator [26.122782625918163]
Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) can be viewed as an implicit estimator of a data distribution.
This paper analyzes the theoretic limitations of the proposal distribution approach.
We introduce a new algorithm, Adversarial Likelihood-Free Inference (ALFI), to mitigate the analyzed limitations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-13T07:37:56Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.