Dissecting the Impact of Model Misspecification in Data-driven Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.00626v2
• Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 21:29:53 GMT
• Title: Dissecting the Impact of Model Misspecification in Data-driven Optimization
• Authors: Adam N. Elmachtoub, Henry Lam, Haixiang Lan, Haofeng Zhang,
• Abstract summary: Data-driven optimization aims to translate a machine learning model into decision-making by optimizing decisions on estimated costs.<n>A more recent approach uses estimation-optimization integration that minimizes decision error instead of estimation error.<n>We show how the integrated approach offers a universal double benefit'' on the top two dominating terms of regret when the underlying model is misspecified.
• Score: 20.35205476800932
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Data-driven optimization aims to translate a machine learning model into decision-making by optimizing decisions on estimated costs. Such a pipeline can be conducted by fitting a distributional model which is then plugged into the target optimization problem. While this fitting can utilize traditional methods such as maximum likelihood, a more recent approach uses estimation-optimization integration that minimizes decision error instead of estimation error. Although intuitive, the statistical benefit of the latter approach is not well understood yet is important to guide the prescriptive usage of machine learning. In this paper, we dissect the performance comparisons between these approaches in terms of the amount of model misspecification. In particular, we show how the integrated approach offers a ``universal double benefit'' on the top two dominating terms of regret when the underlying model is misspecified, while the traditional approach can be advantageous when the model is nearly well-specified. Our comparison is powered by finite-sample tail regret bounds that are derived via new higher-order expansions of regrets and the leveraging of a recent Berry-Esseen theorem.

Related papers

• Calibrated Multi-Preference Optimization for Aligning Diffusion Models [92.90660301195396]
  Calibrated Preference Optimization (CaPO) is a novel method to align text-to-image (T2I) diffusion models.<n>CaPO incorporates the general preference from multiple reward models without human annotated data.<n> Experimental results show that CaPO consistently outperforms prior methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T18:59:23Z)
• Asymptotically Optimal Regret for Black-Box Predict-then-Optimize [7.412445894287709]
  We study new black-box predict-then-optimize problems that lack special structure and where we only observe the reward from the action taken. We present a novel loss function, which we call Empirical Soft Regret (ESR), designed to significantly improve reward when used in training. We also show our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art algorithms on real-world decision-making problems in news recommendation and personalized healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T04:46:23Z)
• Rejection via Learning Density Ratios [50.91522897152437]
  Classification with rejection emerges as a learning paradigm which allows models to abstain from making predictions. We propose a different distributional perspective, where we seek to find an idealized data distribution which maximizes a pretrained model's performance. Our framework is tested empirically over clean and noisy datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T01:32:17Z)
• End-to-End Learning for Fair Multiobjective Optimization Under Uncertainty [55.04219793298687]
  The Predict-Then-Forecast (PtO) paradigm in machine learning aims to maximize downstream decision quality. This paper extends the PtO methodology to optimization problems with nondifferentiable Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) objectives. It shows how optimization of OWA functions can be effectively integrated with parametric prediction for fair and robust optimization under uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T16:33:35Z)
• Estimate-Then-Optimize versus Integrated-Estimation-Optimization versus Sample Average Approximation: A Stochastic Dominance Perspective [15.832111591654293]
  We show that a reverse behavior appears when the model class is well-specified and there is sufficient data. We also demonstrate how standard sample average approximation (SAA) performs the worst when the model class is well-specified in terms of regret.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-13T21:54:53Z)
• A Note on Task-Aware Loss via Reweighing Prediction Loss by Decision-Regret [11.57423546614283]
  We propose a decision-aware version of predict-then-optimize. We reweigh the prediction error by the decision regret incurred by an (unweighted) pilot estimator of costs. We show that this approach can lead to improvements over a "predict-then-optimize" framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-09T18:59:35Z)
• Regret Bounds and Experimental Design for Estimate-then-Optimize [9.340611077939828]
  In practical applications, data is used to make decisions in two steps: estimation and optimization. Errors in the estimation step can lead estimate-then-optimize to sub-optimal decisions. We provide a novel bound on this regret for smooth and unconstrained optimization problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-27T16:13:48Z)
• Learning to Estimate Without Bias [57.82628598276623]
  Gauss theorem states that the weighted least squares estimator is a linear minimum variance unbiased estimation (MVUE) in linear models. In this paper, we take a first step towards extending this result to non linear settings via deep learning with bias constraints. A second motivation to BCE is in applications where multiple estimates of the same unknown are averaged for improved performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-24T10:23:51Z)
• Modeling the Second Player in Distributionally Robust Optimization [90.25995710696425]
  We argue for the use of neural generative models to characterize the worst-case distribution. This approach poses a number of implementation and optimization challenges. We find that the proposed approach yields models that are more robust than comparable baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T14:26:26Z)
• Fast Rates for Contextual Linear Optimization [52.39202699484225]
  We show that a naive plug-in approach achieves regret convergence rates that are significantly faster than methods that directly optimize downstream decision performance. Our results are overall positive for practice: predictive models are easy and fast to train using existing tools, simple to interpret, and, as we show, lead to decisions that perform very well.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-05T18:43:59Z)
• Efficient Ensemble Model Generation for Uncertainty Estimation with Bayesian Approximation in Segmentation [74.06904875527556]
  We propose a generic and efficient segmentation framework to construct ensemble segmentation models. In the proposed method, ensemble models can be efficiently generated by using the layer selection method. We also devise a new pixel-wise uncertainty loss, which improves the predictive performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-21T16:08:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.