Unraveling Pedestrian Fatality Patterns: A Comparative Study with Explainable AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.17623v1
• Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 02:44:41 GMT
• Title: Unraveling Pedestrian Fatality Patterns: A Comparative Study with Explainable AI
• Authors: Methusela Sulle, Judith Mwakalonge, Gurcan Comert, Saidi Siuhi, Nana Kankam Gyimah,
• Abstract summary: This study employs explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to identify key factors contributing to pedestrian fatalities.<n>Results indicate that age, alcohol and drug use, location, and environmental conditions are significant predictors of pedestrian fatalities.<n>Findings reveal that pedestrian fatalities are more common in mid-block locations and areas with poor visibility, with older adults and substance-impaired individuals at higher risk.
• Score: 5.242869847419834
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Road fatalities pose significant public safety and health challenges worldwide, with pedestrians being particularly vulnerable in vehicle-pedestrian crashes due to disparities in physical and performance characteristics. This study employs explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to identify key factors contributing to pedestrian fatalities across the five U.S. states with the highest crash rates (2018-2022). It compares them to the five states with the lowest fatality rates. Using data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS), the study applies machine learning techniques-including Decision Trees, Gradient Boosting Trees, Random Forests, and XGBoost-to predict contributing factors to pedestrian fatalities. To address data imbalance, the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) is utilized, while SHapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) values enhance model interpretability. The results indicate that age, alcohol and drug use, location, and environmental conditions are significant predictors of pedestrian fatalities. The XGBoost model outperformed others, achieving a balanced accuracy of 98 %, accuracy of 90 %, precision of 92 %, recall of 90 %, and an F1 score of 91 %. Findings reveal that pedestrian fatalities are more common in mid-block locations and areas with poor visibility, with older adults and substance-impaired individuals at higher risk. These insights can inform policymakers and urban planners in implementing targeted safety measures, such as improved lighting, enhanced pedestrian infrastructure, and stricter traffic law enforcement, to reduce fatalities and improve public safety.

Related papers

• Driver Age and Its Effect on Key Driving Metrics: Insights from Dynamic Vehicle Data [2.3072218701168166]
  By 2030, the senior population aged 65 and older is expected to increase by over 50%, significantly raising the number of older drivers on the road.<n>Drivers over 70 face higher crash death rates compared to those in their forties and fifties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-12T20:01:07Z)
• Traffic and Safety Rule Compliance of Humans in Diverse Driving Situations [48.924085579865334]
  Analyzing human data is crucial for developing autonomous systems that replicate safe driving practices. This paper presents a comparative evaluation of human compliance with traffic and safety rules across multiple trajectory prediction datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T09:21:00Z)
• CausalDiff: Causality-Inspired Disentanglement via Diffusion Model for Adversarial Defense [61.78357530675446]
  Humans are difficult to be cheated by subtle manipulations, since we make judgments only based on essential factors.<n>Inspired by this observation, we attempt to model label generation with essential label-causative factors and incorporate label-non-causative factors to assist data generation.<n>For an adversarial example, we aim to discriminate perturbations as non-causative factors and make predictions only based on the label-causative factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T15:06:44Z)
• An Explainable Machine Learning Approach to Traffic Accident Fatality Prediction [0.02730969268472861]
  Road traffic accidents pose a significant public health threat worldwide. This study presents a machine learning-based approach for classifying fatal and non-fatal road accident outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-18T12:41:56Z)
• Predicting Overtakes in Trucks Using CAN Data [51.28632782308621]
  We investigate the detection of truck overtakes from CAN data. Our analysis covers up to 10 seconds before the overtaking event. We observe that the prediction scores of the overtake class tend to increase as we approach the overtake trigger.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-08T17:58:22Z)
• RACER: Rational Artificial Intelligence Car-following-model Enhanced by Reality [51.244807332133696]
  This paper introduces RACER, a cutting-edge deep learning car-following model to predict Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) driving behavior. Unlike conventional models, RACER effectively integrates Rational Driving Constraints (RDCs), crucial tenets of actual driving. RACER excels across key metrics, such as acceleration, velocity, and spacing, registering zero violations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-12T06:21:30Z)
• Predicting Accident Severity: An Analysis Of Factors Affecting Accident Severity Using Random Forest Model [0.0]
  This study investigates the effectiveness of the Random Forest machine learning algorithm for predicting the severity of an accident. The model is trained on a dataset of accident records from a large metropolitan area and evaluated using various metrics. Results show that the Random Forest model is an effective tool for predicting accident severity with an accuracy of over 80%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T16:33:44Z)
• Infrastructure-based End-to-End Learning and Prevention of Driver Failure [68.0478623315416]
  FailureNet is a recurrent neural network trained end-to-end on trajectories of both nominal and reckless drivers in a scaled miniature city. It can accurately identify control failures, upstream perception errors, and speeding drivers, distinguishing them from nominal driving. Compared to speed or frequency-based predictors, FailureNet's recurrent neural network structure provides improved predictive power, yielding upwards of 84% accuracy when deployed on hardware.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-21T22:55:51Z)
• Robust Trajectory Prediction against Adversarial Attacks [84.10405251683713]
  Trajectory prediction using deep neural networks (DNNs) is an essential component of autonomous driving systems. These methods are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, leading to serious consequences such as collisions. In this work, we identify two key ingredients to defend trajectory prediction models against adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-29T22:35:05Z)
• A Framework for Pedestrian Sub-classification and Arrival Time Prediction at Signalized Intersection Using Preprocessed Lidar Data [2.8388425545775386]
  We develop a systematic framework with a combination of machine learning and deep learning models to distinguish disabled people from normal walk pedestrians. The proposed framework shows high performance both at vulnerable user classification and arrival time prediction accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-15T15:58:07Z)
• A model for traffic incident prediction using emergency braking data [77.34726150561087]
  We address the fundamental problem of data scarcity in road traffic accident prediction by training our model on emergency braking events instead of accidents. We present a prototype implementing a traffic incident prediction model for Germany based on emergency braking data from Mercedes-Benz vehicles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T18:17:12Z)
• Comparison Analysis of Tree Based and Ensembled Regression Algorithms for Traffic Accident Severity Prediction [2.956978593944786]
  Various machine learning models are being used for accident prediction. Random Forest as the best performing model with highest classification with 0.974 accuracy, 0.954 precision, 0.930 recall and 0.942 F-score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-27T11:52:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.