Generalization Guarantees for Learning Branch-and-Cut Policies in Integer Programming

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.11636v1
• Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 19:00:02 GMT
• Title: Generalization Guarantees for Learning Branch-and-Cut Policies in Integer Programming
• Authors: Hongyu Cheng, Amitabh Basu,
• Abstract summary: Mixed-integer programming (MIP) provides a powerful framework for optimization problems.<n>Branch-and-Cut (B&C) is the predominant algorithm in state-of-the-art solvers.
• Score: 1.1510009152620668
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Mixed-integer programming (MIP) provides a powerful framework for optimization problems, with Branch-and-Cut (B&C) being the predominant algorithm in state-of-the-art solvers. The efficiency of B&C critically depends on heuristic policies for making sequential decisions, including node selection, cut selection, and branching variable selection. While traditional solvers often employ heuristics with manually tuned parameters, recent approaches increasingly leverage machine learning, especially neural networks, to learn these policies directly from data. A key challenge is to understand the theoretical underpinnings of these learned policies, particularly their generalization performance from finite data. This paper establishes rigorous sample complexity bounds for learning B&C policies where the scoring functions guiding each decision step (node, cut, branch) have a certain piecewise polynomial structure. This structure generalizes the linear models that form the most commonly deployed policies in practice and investigated recently in a foundational series of theoretical works by Balcan et al. Such piecewise polynomial policies also cover the neural network architectures (e.g., using ReLU activations) that have been the focal point of contemporary practical studies. Consequently, our theoretical framework closely reflects the models utilized by practitioners investigating machine learning within B&C, offering a unifying perspective relevant to both established theory and modern empirical research in this area. Furthermore, our theory applies to quite general sequential decision making problems beyond B&C.

Related papers

• From Theory to Application: A Practical Introduction to Neural Operators in Scientific Computing [0.0]
  The study covers foundational models such as Deep Operator Networks (DeepONet) and Principal Component Analysis-based Neural Networks (PCANet)<n>The review delves into applying neural operators as surrogates in Bayesian inference problems, showcasing their effectiveness in accelerating posterior inference while maintaining accuracy.<n>It outlines emerging strategies to address these issues, such as residual-based error correction and multi-level training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T17:25:25Z)
• A Prospect-Theoretic Policy Gradient Algorithm for Behavioral Alignment in Reinforcement Learning [0.46040036610482665]
  Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT) provides a more nuanced model for human-based decision-making.<n>CPT captures diverse attitudes and perceptions toward risk, gains, and losses.<n>We revisit the CPT-RL framework, offering new theoretical insights into the nature of optimal policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T15:45:39Z)
• Last-Iterate Global Convergence of Policy Gradients for Constrained Reinforcement Learning [62.81324245896717]
  We introduce an exploration-agnostic algorithm, called C-PG, which exhibits global last-ite convergence guarantees under (weak) gradient domination assumptions. We numerically validate our algorithms on constrained control problems, and compare them with state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T14:54:57Z)
• Decision-focused Graph Neural Networks for Combinatorial Optimization [62.34623670845006]
  An emerging strategy to tackle optimization problems involves the adoption of graph neural networks (GNNs) as an alternative to traditional algorithms. Despite the growing popularity of GNNs and traditional algorithm solvers in the realm of CO, there is limited research on their integrated use and the correlation between them within an end-to-end framework. We introduce a decision-focused framework that utilizes GNNs to address CO problems with auxiliary support.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T22:52:27Z)
• Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraint [56.74058752955209]
  This paper studies the alignment process of generative models with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) We first identify the primary challenges of existing popular methods like offline PPO and offline DPO as lacking in strategical exploration of the environment. We propose efficient algorithms with finite-sample theoretical guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-18T18:58:42Z)
• Unified Algorithms for RL with Decision-Estimation Coefficients: PAC, Reward-Free, Preference-Based Learning, and Beyond [28.118197762236953]
  We develop a unified algorithm framework for a large class of learning goals.<n>Our framework handles many learning goals such as no-regret RL, PAC RL, reward-free learning, model estimation, and preference-based learning.<n>As applications, we propose "decouplable representation" as a natural sufficient condition for bounding generalized DECs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-23T17:47:24Z)
• Multi-Objective Policy Gradients with Topological Constraints [108.10241442630289]
  We present a new algorithm for a policy gradient in TMDPs by a simple extension of the proximal policy optimization (PPO) algorithm. We demonstrate this on a real-world multiple-objective navigation problem with an arbitrary ordering of objectives both in simulation and on a real robot.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-15T07:22:58Z)
• Contextualize Me -- The Case for Context in Reinforcement Learning [49.794253971446416]
  Contextual Reinforcement Learning (cRL) provides a framework to model such changes in a principled manner. We show how cRL contributes to improving zero-shot generalization in RL through meaningful benchmarks and structured reasoning about generalization tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-09T15:01:59Z)
• A Subgame Perfect Equilibrium Reinforcement Learning Approach to Time-inconsistent Problems [4.314956204483074]
  We establish a subgame perfect equilibrium reinforcement learning framework for time-inconsistent (TIC) problems. We propose a new class of algorithms, called backward policy iteration (BPI), that solves SPERL and addresses both challenges. To demonstrate the practical usage of BPI as a training framework, we adapt standard RL simulation methods and derive two BPI-based training algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-27T09:21:35Z)
• Policy Mirror Descent for Regularized Reinforcement Learning: A Generalized Framework with Linear Convergence [60.20076757208645]
  This paper proposes a general policy mirror descent (GPMD) algorithm for solving regularized RL. We demonstrate that our algorithm converges linearly over an entire range learning rates, in a dimension-free fashion, to the global solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-24T02:21:34Z)
• Developing Constrained Neural Units Over Time [81.19349325749037]
  This paper focuses on an alternative way of defining Neural Networks, that is different from the majority of existing approaches. The structure of the neural architecture is defined by means of a special class of constraints that are extended also to the interaction with data. The proposed theory is cast into the time domain, in which data are presented to the network in an ordered manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-01T09:07:25Z)
• Continuous Action Reinforcement Learning from a Mixture of Interpretable Experts [35.80418547105711]
  We propose a policy scheme that retains a complex function approxor for its internal value predictions but constrains the policy to have a concise, hierarchical, and human-readable structure. The main technical contribution of the paper is to address the challenges introduced by this non-differentiable state selection procedure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T16:02:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.