Explainability in Context: A Multilevel Framework Aligning AI Explanations with Stakeholder with LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05887v1
• Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2025 08:54:41 GMT
• Title: Explainability in Context: A Multilevel Framework Aligning AI Explanations with Stakeholder with LLMs
• Authors: Marilyn Bello, Rafael Bello, Maria-Matilde García, Ann Nowé, Iván Sevillano-García, Francisco Herrera,
• Abstract summary: This paper addresses how trust in AI is influenced by the design and delivery of explanations.<n>The framework consists of three layers: algorithmic and domain-based, human-centered, and social explainability.
• Score: 11.11196150521188
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The growing application of artificial intelligence in sensitive domains has intensified the demand for systems that are not only accurate but also explainable and trustworthy. Although explainable AI (XAI) methods have proliferated, many do not consider the diverse audiences that interact with AI systems: from developers and domain experts to end-users and society. This paper addresses how trust in AI is influenced by the design and delivery of explanations and proposes a multilevel framework that aligns explanations with the epistemic, contextual, and ethical expectations of different stakeholders. The framework consists of three layers: algorithmic and domain-based, human-centered, and social explainability. We highlight the emerging role of Large Language Models (LLMs) in enhancing the social layer by generating accessible, natural language explanations. Through illustrative case studies, we demonstrate how this approach facilitates technical fidelity, user engagement, and societal accountability, reframing XAI as a dynamic, trust-building process.

Related papers

• Making Sense of the Unsensible: Reflection, Survey, and Challenges for XAI in Large Language Models Toward Human-Centered AI [11.454716478837014]
  Explainable AI (XAI) acts as a crucial interface between the opaque reasoning of large language models (LLMs) and diverse stakeholders.<n>This paper presents a comprehensive reflection and survey of XAI for LLMs, framed around three guiding questions: Why is explainability essential? What technical and ethical dimensions does it entail?<n>We argue that explainability must evolve into a civic infrastructure fostering trust, enabling contestability, and aligning AI systems with institutional accountability and human-centered decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-18T17:30:10Z)
• A Multi-Layered Research Framework for Human-Centered AI: Defining the Path to Explainability and Trust [2.4578723416255754]
  Human-Centered AI (HCAI) emphasizes alignment with human values, while Explainable AI (XAI) enhances transparency by making AI decisions more understandable.<n>This paper presents a novel three-layered framework that bridges HCAI and XAI to establish a structured explainability paradigm.<n>Our findings advance Human-Centered Explainable AI (HCXAI), fostering AI systems that are transparent, adaptable, and ethically aligned.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T01:29:30Z)
• A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systems [93.8285345915925]
  Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process that enables logical inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), reasoning has emerged as a key capability that distinguishes advanced AI systems.<n>We categorize existing methods along two dimensions: (1) Regimes, which define the stage at which reasoning is achieved; and (2) Architectures, which determine the components involved in the reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-12T01:27:49Z)
• Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): from inherent explainability to large language models [0.0]
  Explainable AI (XAI) techniques facilitate the explainability or interpretability of machine learning models.<n>This paper details the advancements of explainable AI methods, from inherently interpretable models to modern approaches.<n>We review explainable AI techniques that leverage vision-language model (VLM) frameworks to automate or improve the explainability of other machine learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-17T06:16:57Z)
• Explainable and Interpretable Multimodal Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey [46.617998833238126]
  Large language models (LLMs) and computer vision (CV) systems driving advancements in natural language understanding and visual processing.<n>The convergence of these technologies has catalyzed the rise of multimodal AI, enabling richer, cross-modal understanding that spans text, vision, audio, and video modalities.<n>Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have emerged as a powerful framework, demonstrating impressive capabilities in tasks like image-text generation, visual question answering, and cross-modal retrieval.<n>Despite these advancements, the complexity and scale of MLLMs introduce significant challenges in interpretability and explainability, essential for establishing
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-03T02:54:31Z)
• Converging Paradigms: The Synergy of Symbolic and Connectionist AI in LLM-Empowered Autonomous Agents [55.63497537202751]
  Article explores the convergence of connectionist and symbolic artificial intelligence (AI) Traditionally, connectionist AI focuses on neural networks, while symbolic AI emphasizes symbolic representation and logic. Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) highlight the potential of connectionist architectures in handling human language as a form of symbols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T14:00:53Z)
• Position Paper: Agent AI Towards a Holistic Intelligence [53.35971598180146]
  We emphasize developing Agent AI -- an embodied system that integrates large foundation models into agent actions. In this paper, we propose a novel large action model to achieve embodied intelligent behavior, the Agent Foundation Model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T16:09:56Z)
• Emergent Explainability: Adding a causal chain to neural network inference [0.0]
  This position paper presents a theoretical framework for enhancing explainable artificial intelligence (xAI) through emergent communication (EmCom) We explore the novel integration of EmCom into AI systems, offering a paradigm shift from conventional associative relationships between inputs and outputs to a more nuanced, causal interpretation. The paper discusses the theoretical underpinnings of this approach, its potential broad applications, and its alignment with the growing need for responsible and transparent AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T02:28:39Z)
• Enabling High-Level Machine Reasoning with Cognitive Neuro-Symbolic Systems [67.01132165581667]
  We propose to enable high-level reasoning in AI systems by integrating cognitive architectures with external neuro-symbolic components. We illustrate a hybrid framework centered on ACT-R and we discuss the role of generative models in recent and future applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T21:20:17Z)
• A general framework for scientifically inspired explanations in AI [76.48625630211943]
  We instantiate the concept of structure of scientific explanation as the theoretical underpinning for a general framework in which explanations for AI systems can be implemented. This framework aims to provide the tools to build a "mental-model" of any AI system so that the interaction with the user can provide information on demand and be closer to the nature of human-made explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T10:32:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.