Related papers: A Technical Survey of Reinforcement Learning Techniques for Large Language Models

A Technical Survey of Reinforcement Learning Techniques for Large Language Models

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.04136v1
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2025 19:13:00 GMT
Title: A Technical Survey of Reinforcement Learning Techniques for Large Language Models
Authors: Saksham Sahai Srivastava, Vaneet Aggarwal,
Abstract summary: Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a transformative approach for aligning and enhancing Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>RLHF remains dominant for alignment, and outcome-based RL such as RLVR significantly improves stepwise reasoning.<n> persistent challenges such as reward hacking, computational costs, and scalable feedback collection underscore the need for continued innovation.
Score: 33.38582292895673
License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a transformative approach for aligning and enhancing Large Language Models (LLMs), addressing critical challenges in instruction following, ethical alignment, and reasoning capabilities. This survey offers a comprehensive foundation on the integration of RL with language models, highlighting prominent algorithms such as Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), Q-Learning, and Actor-Critic methods. Additionally, it provides an extensive technical overview of RL techniques specifically tailored for LLMs, including foundational methods like Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) and AI Feedback (RLAIF), as well as advanced strategies such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). We systematically analyze their applications across domains, i.e., from code generation to tool-augmented reasoning. We also present a comparative taxonomy based on reward modeling, feedback mechanisms, and optimization strategies. Our evaluation highlights key trends. RLHF remains dominant for alignment, and outcome-based RL such as RLVR significantly improves stepwise reasoning. However, persistent challenges such as reward hacking, computational costs, and scalable feedback collection underscore the need for continued innovation. We further discuss emerging directions, including hybrid RL algorithms, verifier-guided training, and multi-objective alignment frameworks. This survey serves as a roadmap for researchers advancing RL-driven LLM development, balancing capability enhancement with safety and scalability.

Related papers

Inverse Reinforcement Learning Meets Large Language Model Post-Training: Basics, Advances, and Opportunities [62.05713042908654]
This paper provides a review of advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) alignment through the lens of inverse reinforcement learning (IRL)<n>We highlight the necessity of constructing neural reward models from human data and discuss the formal and practical implications of this paradigm shift.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-17T14:22:24Z)
Scaling Up RL: Unlocking Diverse Reasoning in LLMs via Prolonged Training [121.5858973157225]
We investigate the effects of prolonged reinforcement learning on a small language model across a diverse set of reasoning domains.<n>We introduce controlled KL regularization, clipping ratio, and periodic reference policy resets as critical components for unlocking long-term performance gains.<n>Our model achieves significant improvements over strong baselines, including +14.7% on math, +13.9% on coding, and +54.8% on logic puzzle tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-16T17:59:24Z)
Enhancing Code LLMs with Reinforcement Learning in Code Generation: A Survey [15.37013454932678]
Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enhancing large language models (LLMs)<n>This survey systematically reviews RL-driven techniques across the code development lifecycle.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-29T06:15:41Z)
Improving Multi-Step Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models with Direct Advantage Policy Optimization [22.67700436936984]
We introduce Direct Advantage Policy Optimization (DAPO), a novel step-level offline reinforcement learning algorithm.<n>DAPO employs a critic function to predict the reasoning accuracy at each step, thereby generating dense signals to refine the generation strategy.<n>Our results show that DAPO can effectively enhance the mathematical and code capabilities on both SFT models and RL models, demonstrating the effectiveness of DAPO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-24T08:39:35Z)
Reinforcement Learning Enhanced LLMs: A Survey [45.57586245741664]
We will make a systematic review of the most up-to-date state of knowledge on RL-enhanced large language models (LLMs)<n>Specifically, we detail the basics of RL; (2) introduce popular RL-enhanced LLMs; (3) review researches on two widely-used reward model-based RL techniques: Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) and Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (RLAIF)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-05T16:10:42Z)
A Comprehensive Survey of Reinforcement Learning: From Algorithms to Practical Challenges [2.2448567386846916]
Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm in Artificial Intelligence (AI)<n>This paper presents a comprehensive survey of RL, meticulously analyzing a wide range of algorithms.<n>We offer practical insights into the selection and implementation of RL algorithms, addressing common challenges like convergence, stability, and the exploration-exploitation dilemma.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-28T03:53:14Z)
Learning Reward and Policy Jointly from Demonstration and Preference Improves Alignment [58.049113055986375]
We develop a single stage approach named Alignment with Integrated Human Feedback (AIHF) to train reward models and the policy.<n>The proposed approach admits a suite of efficient algorithms, which can easily reduce to, and leverage, popular alignment algorithms.<n>We demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed solutions with extensive experiments involving alignment problems in LLMs and robotic control problems in MuJoCo.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-11T01:20:53Z)
How Can LLM Guide RL? A Value-Based Approach [68.55316627400683]
Reinforcement learning (RL) has become the de facto standard practice for sequential decision-making problems by improving future acting policies with feedback. Recent developments in large language models (LLMs) have showcased impressive capabilities in language understanding and generation, yet they fall short in exploration and self-improvement capabilities. We develop an algorithm named LINVIT that incorporates LLM guidance as a regularization factor in value-based RL, leading to significant reductions in the amount of data needed for learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-25T20:07:13Z)
Reinforcement Learning-assisted Evolutionary Algorithm: A Survey and Research Opportunities [63.258517066104446]
Reinforcement learning integrated as a component in the evolutionary algorithm has demonstrated superior performance in recent years. We discuss the RL-EA integration method, the RL-assisted strategy adopted by RL-EA, and its applications according to the existing literature. In the applications of RL-EA section, we also demonstrate the excellent performance of RL-EA on several benchmarks and a range of public datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-25T15:06:05Z)
Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part I: PPO [81.01936993929127]
Large language models (LLMs) have formulated a blueprint for the advancement of artificial general intelligence. reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) emerges as the pivotal technological paradigm underpinning this pursuit. In this report, we dissect the framework of RLHF, re-evaluate the inner workings of PPO, and explore how the parts comprising PPO algorithms impact policy agent training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-11T01:55:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.