Artificial Intelligence and Journalism: A Systematic Bibliometric and Thematic Analysis of Global Research
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.10891v1
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 01:11:39 GMT
- Title: Artificial Intelligence and Journalism: A Systematic Bibliometric and Thematic Analysis of Global Research
- Authors: Mohammad Al Masum Molla, Md Manjurul Ahsan,
- Abstract summary: This study presents a comprehensive systematic review of published articles on AI in journalism from 2010 to 2025.<n>The findings show a sharp increase in research activity after 2020, with prominent focus areas including automation, misinformation, and ethical governance.<n>The review also highlights regional disparities in scholarly contributions, with limited representation from the Global South.
- Score: 0.51795041186793
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping journalistic practices across the globe, offering new opportunities while raising ethical, professional, and societal concerns. This study presents a comprehensive systematic review of published articles on AI in journalism from 2010 to 2025. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, a total of 72 peer-reviewed articles were selected from Scopus and Web of Science databases. The analysis combines bibliometric mapping and qualitative thematic synthesis to identify dominant trends, technologies, geographical distributions, and ethical debates. Additionally, sentiment analysis was performed on article abstracts using the Valence Aware Dictionary and sEntiment Reasoner (VADER) algorithm to capture evaluative tones across the literature. The findings show a sharp increase in research activity after 2020, with prominent focus areas including automation, misinformation, and ethical governance. While most studies reflect cautious optimism, concerns over bias, transparency, and accountability remain persistent. The review also highlights regional disparities in scholarly contributions, with limited representation from the Global South. By integrating quantitative and qualitative insights, this study offers a multi-dimensional understanding of how AI is transforming journalism and proposes future research directions for inclusive and responsible innovation.
Related papers
- The AI Imperative: Scaling High-Quality Peer Review in Machine Learning [49.87236114682497]
We argue that AI-assisted peer review must become an urgent research and infrastructure priority.<n>We propose specific roles for AI in enhancing factual verification, guiding reviewer performance, assisting authors in quality improvement, and supporting ACs in decision-making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-09T18:37:14Z) - Trends and Challenges in Authorship Analysis: A Review of ML, DL, and LLM Approaches [1.8686807993563161]
Authorship analysis plays an important role in diverse domains, including forensic linguistics, academia, cybersecurity, and digital content authentication.<n>This paper presents a systematic literature review on two key sub-tasks of authorship analysis; Author Attribution and Author Verification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-21T12:06:08Z) - Agentic AI for Scientific Discovery: A Survey of Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions [0.0]
Agentic AI systems are capable of reasoning, planning, and autonomous decision-making.<n>They are transforming how scientists perform literature review, generate hypotheses, conduct experiments, and analyze results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-12T01:00:05Z) - Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluation [58.064940977804596]
A plethora of new AI models and tools has been proposed, promising to empower researchers and academics worldwide to conduct their research more effectively and efficiently.<n>Ethical concerns regarding shortcomings of these tools and potential for misuse take a particularly prominent place in our discussion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-07T18:26:45Z) - Unleashing the Power of AI. A Systematic Review of Cutting-Edge Techniques in AI-Enhanced Scientometrics, Webometrics, and Bibliometrics [1.2374541748245838]
The study aims to analyze the synergy of Artificial Intelligence (AI) with scientometrics, webometrics, and bibliometrics.
Our aim is to explore the potential of AI in revolutionizing the methods used to measure and analyze scholarly communication.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-22T15:10:02Z) - A Literature Review of Literature Reviews in Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence [55.33653554387953]
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI) has led to numerous literature reviews aimed at collecting and fragmented information.<n>This paper presents a thorough analysis of these literature reviews within the PAMI field.<n>We try to address three core research questions: (1) What are the prevalent structural and statistical characteristics of PAMI literature reviews; (2) What strategies can researchers employ to efficiently navigate the growing corpus of reviews; and (3) What are the advantages and limitations of AI-generated reviews compared to human-authored ones.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-20T11:28:50Z) - Landscape of Generative AI in Global News: Topics, Sentiments, and
Spatiotemporal Analysis [1.5249435285717095]
Generative AI has exhibited considerable potential to transform various industries and public life.
The role of news media coverage of generative AI is pivotal in shaping public perceptions and judgments about this significant technological innovation.
This paper provides in-depth analysis and rich insights into the temporal and spatial distribution of topics, sentiment, and substantive themes within global news coverage focusing on generative AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-17T00:53:31Z) - AI in Supply Chain Risk Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis [0.0]
This study examines 1,903 articles from Google Scholar and Web of Science, with 54 studies selected through PRISMA guidelines.<n>Our findings reveal that ML models, including Random Forest, XGBoost, and hybrid approaches, significantly enhance risk prediction accuracy and adaptability in post-pandemic contexts.<n>The study underscores the necessity of dynamic strategies, interdisciplinary collaboration, and continuous model evaluation to address challenges such as data quality and interpretability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-12T17:47:51Z) - Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model
Enhanced Approach [77.61131357420201]
We conduct a thorough and rigorous study on fairness disparities in peer review with the help of large language models (LMs)
We collect, assemble, and maintain a comprehensive relational database for the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) conference from 2017 to date.
We postulate and study fairness disparities on multiple protective attributes of interest, including author gender, geography, author, and institutional prestige.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-07T16:19:42Z) - Artificial Intelligence in Concrete Materials: A Scientometric View [77.34726150561087]
This chapter aims to uncover the main research interests and knowledge structure of the existing literature on AI for concrete materials.
To begin with, a total of 389 journal articles published from 1990 to 2020 were retrieved from the Web of Science.
Scientometric tools such as keyword co-occurrence analysis and documentation co-citation analysis were adopted to quantify features and characteristics of the research field.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-17T18:24:56Z) - Characterising Research Areas in the field of AI [68.8204255655161]
We identified the main conceptual themes by performing clustering analysis on the co-occurrence network of topics.
The results highlight the growing academic interest in research themes like deep learning, machine learning, and internet of things.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-26T16:30:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.