LLMs are Single-threaded Reasoners: Demystifying the Working Mechanism of Soft Thinking

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.03440v4
• Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 01:59:24 GMT
• Title: LLMs are Single-threaded Reasoners: Demystifying the Working Mechanism of Soft Thinking
• Authors: Junhong Wu, Jinliang Lu, Zixuan Ren, Gangqiang Hu, Zhi Wu, Dai Dai, Hua Wu,
• Abstract summary: We investigate the Soft Thinking capabilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>Contrary to the prevailing belief that Soft Thinking supports parallel exploration of diverse reasoning paths, our findings reveal that LLMs behave as single-threaded reasoners.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that randomness--particularly with the Gumbel-max trick--can alleviate the limitations of vanilla approaches.
• Score: 25.468889616586363
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Human cognition naturally engages with abstract and fluid concepts, whereas existing reasoning models often rely on generating discrete tokens, potentially constraining their expressive capabilities. Recent advancements aim to address this limitation by enabling large language models (LLMs) to generate soft, abstract tokens, thus facilitating reasoning within a continuous concept space. In this paper, we investigate the Soft Thinking capabilities of various LLMs through a systematic analysis of their internal behavior using a suite of probing techniques. Contrary to the prevailing belief that Soft Thinking supports parallel exploration of diverse reasoning paths, our findings reveal that LLMs behave as single-threaded reasoners--they predominantly rely on the token with the highest probability in the soft input to predict the next step. This behavior induces a greedy feedback loop that suppresses alternative reasoning paths and undermines the benefits of transmitting richer information via Soft Tokens. To address this Greedy Pitfall, we propose Stochastic Soft Thinking, which introduces stochasticity to break free from this Greedy Pitfall. Our experiments demonstrate that incorporating randomness--particularly with the Gumbel-Softmax trick--can alleviate the limitations of vanilla approaches and unleash the potential of Soft Thinking, resulting in superior performance across eight reasoning benchmarks. We further demonstrate that Stochastic Soft Thinking exhibits stronger exploration potential compared to conventional COT. Our findings deepen the understanding of continuous reasoning and establish the foundation for future work on improving Soft Thinking with Reinforcement Learning.

Related papers

• Towards Generalizable Reasoning: Group Causal Counterfactual Policy Optimization for LLM Reasoning [50.352417879912515]
  Large language models (LLMs) excel at complex tasks with advances in reasoning capabilities.<n>We propose Group Causal Counterfactual Policy Optimization to explicitly train LLMs to learn generalizable reasoning patterns.<n>We then construct token-level advantages from this reward and optimize the policy, encouraging LLMs to favor reasoning patterns that are process-valid and counterfactually robust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-06T08:03:11Z)
• Improving Latent Reasoning in LLMs via Soft Concept Mixing [5.230565644173722]
  Large language models (LLMs) typically reason by generating discrete tokens.<n>We propose Soft Concept Mixing (SCM), a soft concept aware training scheme.<n>SCM exposes the model to soft representations during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-21T01:43:28Z)
• Latent Reasoning in LLMs as a Vocabulary-Space Superposition [80.01651003144282]
  Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning abilities with chain-of-thought prompting, but explicit reasoning introduces substantial computational overhead.<n>Recent work on latent reasoning reduces this cost by reasoning in latent space without explicit supervision, but performance drops significantly.<n>To address this, we restrict the latent space to the column space of the LLM vocabulary, treating latent reasoning as a superposition over vocabulary probabilities.<n>Once latent reasoning concludes, it collapses into an eigenstate of explicit reasoning to yield the final answer.<n>Latent-SFT sets a new state of the art on GSM8k, matching explicit
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T10:51:20Z)
• Latent Thinking Optimization: Your Latent Reasoning Language Model Secretly Encodes Reward Signals in Its Latent Thoughts [16.941385792353493]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at problem solving by generating chain of thoughts in natural language.<n>Recent work proposes a latent thinking architecture Huginn-3.5B, which represents intermediate reasoning steps as sequence of latent representations.<n>We show how Huginn-3.5B thinks in the latent space and how external supervision signals can improve its latent thinking processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T14:26:36Z)
• MARCOS: Deep Thinking by Markov Chain of Continuous Thoughts [82.46857666702924]
  We present a new paradigm for reasoning in large language models (LLMs)<n>Instead of autoregressively generating tokens, we model reasoning as a hidden Markov chain of continuous, high-dimensional "thoughts"<n>For the first time, MARCOS achieves performance comparable to token-based CoT, even surpassing it by 4.7% on GSM8K with up to 15.7x speedup in inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T16:44:22Z)
• Learning Temporal Abstractions via Variational Homomorphisms in Option-Induced Abstract MDPs [17.335266921332092]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable reasoning ability through explicit Chain-of-Thought prompting.<n>We develop a framework for efficient, implicit reasoning, where the model "thinks" in a latent space without generating explicit text for every step.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-22T11:22:58Z)
• A Survey on Latent Reasoning [100.54120559169735]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning capabilities.<n>CoT reasoning that verbalizes intermediate steps limits the model's expressive bandwidth.<n>Latent reasoning tackles this bottleneck by performing multi-step inference entirely in the model's continuous hidden state.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T17:29:07Z)
• Perceptual Decoupling for Scalable Multi-modal Reasoning via Reward-Optimized Captioning [78.17782197231325]
  We propose a reasoning-guided reinforcement learning strategy that aligns the extractor's captioning behavior with the reasoning objective.<n> Experiments on multi-modal math and science benchmarks show that the proposed RACRO method achieves state-of-the-art average performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T02:28:07Z)
• Reason from Future: Reverse Thought Chain Enhances LLM Reasoning [18.637191592875155]
  We propose a novel reasoning paradigm called Reason from Future (RFF)<n>RFF generates reasoning paths by bidirectional reasoning that combines top-down planning with bottom-up reasoning accumulation.<n>RFF outperforms conventional paradigms with higher accuracy and less searching space to solve complex tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T08:03:17Z)
• Soft Thinking: Unlocking the Reasoning Potential of LLMs in Continuous Concept Space [62.54887038032942]
  We introduce Soft Thinking, a training-free method that emulates human-like "soft" reasoning by generating soft, abstract concept tokens.<n>These concept tokens are created by the probability-weighted mixture of token embeddings, which form the continuous concept space.<n>In essence, each generated concept token encapsulates multiple meanings from related discrete tokens, implicitly exploring various reasoning paths to converge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T17:29:15Z)
• "Well, Keep Thinking": Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Adaptive Injection Decoding [4.008780119020479]
  Large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong reasoning abilities, often attributed to few-shot or zero-shot chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting.<n>We propose a novel decoding strategy that systematically nudges LLMs to continue reasoning, thereby preventing immature reasoning processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-13T08:46:32Z)
• SoftCoT: Soft Chain-of-Thought for Efficient Reasoning with LLMs [48.28847964704554]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning enables Large Language Models (LLMs) to solve complex reasoning tasks.<n>We propose a novel approach for continuous-space reasoning that does not require modifying the LLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T18:52:29Z)
• Thoughts Are All Over the Place: On the Underthinking of o1-Like LLMs [86.79757571440082]
  Large language models (LLMs) such as OpenAI's o1 have demonstrated remarkable abilities in complex reasoning tasks.<n>We identify a phenomenon we term underthinking, where o1-like LLMs frequently switch between different reasoning thoughts.<n>We propose a decoding strategy with thought switching penalty TIP that discourages premature transitions between thoughts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T18:58:18Z)
• Fact :Teaching MLLMs with Faithful, Concise and Transferable Rationales [102.54274021830207]
  We introduce Fact, a novel paradigm designed to generate multimodal rationales that are faithful, concise, and transferable for teaching MLLMs. We filter rationales that can be transferred to end-to-end paradigms from programming paradigms to guarantee transferability. Our approach also reduces hallucinations owing to its high correlation between images and text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T07:20:56Z)
• Learning From Correctness Without Prompting Makes LLM Efficient Reasoner [30.203952806009717]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated outstanding performance across various tasks, yet they still exhibit limitations such as hallucination, unfaithful reasoning, and toxic content. We introduce an intrinsic self-correct reasoning framework for LLMs that eliminates the need for human feedback, external tools, and handcraft prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T02:12:49Z)
• What if...?: Thinking Counterfactual Keywords Helps to Mitigate Hallucination in Large Multi-modal Models [50.97705264224828]
  We propose Counterfactual Inception, a novel method that implants counterfactual thinking into Large Multi-modal Models. We aim for the models to engage with and generate responses that span a wider contextual scene understanding. Comprehensive analyses across various LMMs, including both open-source and proprietary models, corroborate that counterfactual thinking significantly reduces hallucination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T11:27:20Z)
• Synergy-of-Thoughts: Eliciting Efficient Reasoning in Hybrid Language Models [19.466985579720507]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive emergent abilities in a wide range of tasks, but the associated expensive API cost greatly limits the real application. We propose "Synergy of Thoughts"(SoT) to unleash the synergistic potential of hybrid LLMs with different scales for efficient reasoning. We show that SoT substantially reduces the API cost by 38.3%-75.1%, and simultaneously achieves state-of-the-art reasoning accuracy and solution diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T16:45:01Z)
• MuSR: Testing the Limits of Chain-of-thought with Multistep Soft Reasoning [63.80739044622555]
  We introduce MuSR, a dataset for evaluating language models on soft reasoning tasks specified in a natural language narrative. This dataset has two crucial features. First, it is created through a novel neurosymbolic synthetic-to-natural generation algorithm. Second, our dataset instances are free text narratives corresponding to real-world domains of reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T17:59:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.