Effect of Data Augmentation on Conformal Prediction for Diabetic Retinopathy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.14266v1
• Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 20:55:06 GMT
• Title: Effect of Data Augmentation on Conformal Prediction for Diabetic Retinopathy
• Authors: Rizwan Ahamed, Annahita Amireskandari, Joel Palko, Carol Laxson, Binod Bhattarai, Prashnna Gyawali,
• Abstract summary: We investigate how different data augmentation strategies affect the performance of conformal predictors for diabetic retinopathy grading.<n>Our results demonstrate that sample-mixing strategies like Mixup and CutMix not only improve predictive accuracy but also yield more reliable and efficient uncertainty estimates.
• Score: 6.656858522657063
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The clinical deployment of deep learning models for high-stakes tasks such as diabetic retinopathy (DR) grading requires demonstrable reliability. While models achieve high accuracy, their clinical utility is limited by a lack of robust uncertainty quantification. Conformal prediction (CP) offers a distribution-free framework to generate prediction sets with statistical guarantees of coverage. However, the interaction between standard training practices like data augmentation and the validity of these guarantees is not well understood. In this study, we systematically investigate how different data augmentation strategies affect the performance of conformal predictors for DR grading. Using the DDR dataset, we evaluate two backbone architectures -- ResNet-50 and a Co-Scale Conv-Attentional Transformer (CoaT) -- trained under five augmentation regimes: no augmentation, standard geometric transforms, CLAHE, Mixup, and CutMix. We analyze the downstream effects on conformal metrics, including empirical coverage, average prediction set size, and correct efficiency. Our results demonstrate that sample-mixing strategies like Mixup and CutMix not only improve predictive accuracy but also yield more reliable and efficient uncertainty estimates. Conversely, methods like CLAHE can negatively impact model certainty. These findings highlight the need to co-design augmentation strategies with downstream uncertainty quantification in mind to build genuinely trustworthy AI systems for medical imaging.

Related papers

• Adaptive-CaRe: Adaptive Causal Regularization for Robust Outcome Prediction [16.391352325575763]
  Supervised machine learning algorithms are commonly used for outcome prediction in the medical domain.<n>We propose a novel model-agnostic regularization strategy, Adaptive-CaRe, for generalized outcome prediction in the medical domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-06T11:14:03Z)
• The effect of data augmentation and 3D-CNN depth on Alzheimer's Disease detection [51.697248252191265]
  This work summarizes and strictly observes best practices regarding data handling, experimental design, and model evaluation. We focus on Alzheimer's Disease (AD) detection, which serves as a paradigmatic example of challenging problem in healthcare. Within this framework, we train predictive 15 models, considering three different data augmentation strategies and five distinct 3D CNN architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T10:40:41Z)
• Uncertainty Aware Training to Improve Deep Learning Model Calibration for Classification of Cardiac MR Images [3.9402047771122812]
  Quantifying uncertainty of predictions has been identified as one way to develop more trustworthy AI models. We evaluate three novel uncertainty-aware training strategies comparing against two state-of-the-art approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-29T09:19:49Z)
• Automatic diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis severity using Swin transformer [55.01037422579516]
  Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a widespread condition that can cause chronic pain and stiffness in the knee joint. We propose an automated approach that employs the Swin Transformer to predict the severity of KOA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-10T09:49:30Z)
• Towards Reliable Medical Image Segmentation by utilizing Evidential Calibrated Uncertainty [52.03490691733464]
  We introduce DEviS, an easily implementable foundational model that seamlessly integrates into various medical image segmentation networks. By leveraging subjective logic theory, we explicitly model probability and uncertainty for the problem of medical image segmentation. DeviS incorporates an uncertainty-aware filtering module, which utilizes the metric of uncertainty-calibrated error to filter reliable data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-01T05:02:46Z)
• Improving Trustworthiness of AI Disease Severity Rating in Medical Imaging with Ordinal Conformal Prediction Sets [0.7734726150561088]
  A lack of statistically rigorous uncertainty quantification is a significant factor undermining trust in AI results. Recent developments in distribution-free uncertainty quantification present practical solutions for these issues. We demonstrate a technique for forming ordinal prediction sets that are guaranteed to contain the correct stenosis severity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-05T18:01:20Z)
• BSM loss: A superior way in modeling aleatory uncertainty of fine_grained classification [0.0]
  We propose a modified Bootstrapping loss(BS loss) function with Mixup data augmentation strategy. Our experiments indicated that BS loss with Mixup(BSM) model can halve the Expected Error(ECE) compared to standard data augmentation. BSM model is able to perceive the semantic distance of out-of-domain data, demonstrating high potential in real-world clinical practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-09T13:06:51Z)
• Distribution-Free Federated Learning with Conformal Predictions [0.0]
  Federated learning aims to leverage separate institutional datasets while maintaining patient privacy. Poor calibration and lack of interpretability may hamper widespread deployment of federated models into clinical practice. We propose to address these challenges by incorporating an adaptive conformal framework into federated learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-14T18:41:17Z)
• Bootstrapping Your Own Positive Sample: Contrastive Learning With Electronic Health Record Data [62.29031007761901]
  This paper proposes a novel contrastive regularized clinical classification model. We introduce two unique positive sampling strategies specifically tailored for EHR data. Our framework yields highly competitive experimental results in predicting the mortality risk on real-world COVID-19 EHR data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T06:02:04Z)
• UNITE: Uncertainty-based Health Risk Prediction Leveraging Multi-sourced Data [81.00385374948125]
  We present UNcertaInTy-based hEalth risk prediction (UNITE) model. UNITE provides accurate disease risk prediction and uncertainty estimation leveraging multi-sourced health data. We evaluate UNITE on real-world disease risk prediction tasks: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NASH) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) UNITE achieves up to 0.841 in F1 score for AD detection, up to 0.609 in PR-AUC for NASH detection, and outperforms various state-of-the-art baselines by up to $19%$ over the best baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T02:28:11Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.