Considerations for Estimating Causal Effects of Informatively Timed Treatments

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.21804v1
• Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 17:32:47 GMT
• Title: Considerations for Estimating Causal Effects of Informatively Timed Treatments
• Authors: Arman Oganisian,
• Abstract summary: We show how g-methods can be used to analyze sequential treatments that are informatively timed.<n>Using synthetic examples, we illustrate how g-methods that do not adjust for these waiting times may be biased.<n>We provide implementation guidance and examples using publicly available software.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Epidemiological studies are often concerned with estimating causal effects of a sequence of treatment decisions on survival outcomes. In many settings, treatment decisions do not occur at fixed, pre-specified followup times. Rather, timing varies across subjects in ways that may be informative of subsequent treatment decisions and potential outcomes. Awareness of the issue and its potential solutions is lacking in the literature, which motivate this work. Here, we formalize the issue of informative timing, problems associated with ignoring it, and show how g-methods can be used to analyze sequential treatments that are informatively timed. As we describe, in such settings, the waiting times between successive treatment decisions may be properly viewed as a time-varying confounders. Using synthetic examples, we illustrate how g-methods that do not adjust for these waiting times may be biased and how adjustment can be done in scenarios where patients may die or be censored in between treatments. We draw connections between adjustment and identification with discrete-time versus continuous-time models. Finally, we provide implementation guidance and examples using publicly available software. Our concluding message is that 1) considering timing is important for valid inference and 2) correcting for informative timing can be done with g-methods that adjust for waiting times between treatments as time-varying confounders.

Related papers

• Beyond the ATE: Interpretable Modelling of Treatment Effects over Dose and Time [46.2482873419289]
  We propose a framework for modelling treatment effect trajectories as smooth surfaces over dose and time.<n>Our approach decouples the estimation of trajectory shape from the specification of clinically relevant properties.<n>We show that our method yields accurate, interpretable, and editable models of treatment dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-09T20:33:33Z)
• Causal Inference with Complex Treatments: A Survey [34.653398789722104]
  Causal inference plays an important role in explanatory analysis and decision making across various fields like statistics, marketing, health care, and education. In this paper, we refer to complex treatments and systematically and comprehensively review the causal inference methods for addressing them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T04:46:58Z)
• Dynamic Local Average Treatment Effects [19.014535120129338]
  We consider Dynamic Treatment Regimes (DTRs) with One Sided Noncompliance in digital recommendations and adaptive medical trials.<n>We provide nonparametric identification, estimation, and inference for Dynamic Local Average Treatment Effects (LATEs)<n>We show that the assumptions are sufficient to identify Dynamic LATEs for treating in multiple time periods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T16:52:09Z)
• Accounting For Informative Sampling When Learning to Forecast Treatment Outcomes Over Time [66.08455276899578]
  We show that informative sampling can prohibit accurate estimation of treatment outcomes if not properly accounted for. We present a general framework for learning treatment outcomes in the presence of informative sampling using inverse intensity-weighting. We propose a novel method, TESAR-CDE, that instantiates this framework using Neural CDEs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T08:51:06Z)
• TCFimt: Temporal Counterfactual Forecasting from Individual Multiple Treatment Perspective [50.675845725806724]
  We propose a comprehensive framework of temporal counterfactual forecasting from an individual multiple treatment perspective (TCFimt) TCFimt constructs adversarial tasks in a seq2seq framework to alleviate selection and time-varying bias and designs a contrastive learning-based block to decouple a mixed treatment effect into separated main treatment effects and causal interactions. The proposed method shows satisfactory performance in predicting future outcomes with specific treatments and in choosing optimal treatment type and timing than state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-17T15:01:05Z)
• Continuous-Time Modeling of Counterfactual Outcomes Using Neural Controlled Differential Equations [84.42837346400151]
  Estimating counterfactual outcomes over time has the potential to unlock personalized healthcare. Existing causal inference approaches consider regular, discrete-time intervals between observations and treatment decisions. We propose a controllable simulation environment based on a model of tumor growth for a range of scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T17:15:15Z)
• Disentangled Counterfactual Recurrent Networks for Treatment Effect Inference over Time [71.30985926640659]
  We introduce the Disentangled Counterfactual Recurrent Network (DCRN), a sequence-to-sequence architecture that estimates treatment outcomes over time. With an architecture that is completely inspired by the causal structure of treatment influence over time, we advance forecast accuracy and disease understanding. We demonstrate that DCRN outperforms current state-of-the-art methods in forecasting treatment responses, on both real and simulated data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-07T16:40:28Z)
• SurvITE: Learning Heterogeneous Treatment Effects from Time-to-Event Data [83.50281440043241]
  We study the problem of inferring heterogeneous treatment effects from time-to-event data. We propose a novel deep learning method for treatment-specific hazard estimation based on balancing representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-26T20:13:17Z)
• Sequential Deconfounding for Causal Inference with Unobserved Confounders [18.586616164230566]
  We develop the Sequential Deconfounder, a method that enables estimating individualized treatment effects over time. This is the first deconfounding method that can be used in a general sequential setting. We prove that using our method yields unbiased estimates of individualized treatment responses over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-16T09:56:39Z)
• Estimating Counterfactual Treatment Outcomes over Time Through Adversarially Balanced Representations [114.16762407465427]
  We introduce the Counterfactual Recurrent Network (CRN) to estimate treatment effects over time. CRN uses domain adversarial training to build balancing representations of the patient history. We show how our model achieves lower error in estimating counterfactuals and in choosing the correct treatment and timing of treatment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-10T20:47:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.