Patterns in the Transition From Founder-Leadership to Community Governance of Open Source

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.16295v3
• Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2025 02:17:58 GMT
• Title: Patterns in the Transition From Founder-Leadership to Community Governance of Open Source
• Authors: Mobina Noori, Mahasweta Chakraborti, Amy X Zhang, Seth Frey,
• Abstract summary: We analyze 637 GitHub repositories to trace transitions from founder-led to shared governance.<n>We find roles and actions grow, and regulation becomes more balanced.
• Score: 12.47967674379491
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Open digital public infrastructure needs community management to ensure accountability, sustainability, and robustness. Yet open-source projects often rely on centralized decision-making, and the determinants of successful community management remain unclear. We analyze 637 GitHub repositories to trace transitions from founder-led to shared governance. Specifically, we document trajectories to community governance by extracting institutional roles, actions, and deontic cues from version-controlled project constitutions (GOVERNANCE.md). With a semantic parsing pipeline, we cluster elements into broader role and action types. We find roles and actions grow, and regulation becomes more balanced, reflecting increases in governance scope and differentiation over time. Rather than shifting tone, communities grow by layering and refining responsibilities. As transitions to community management mature, projects increasingly regulate ecosystem-level relationships and add definition to project oversight roles. Overall, this work offers a scalable pipeline for tracking the growth and development of community governance regimes from open-source software's familiar default of founder-ownership.

Related papers

• Towards a Science of Collective AI: LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems Need a Transition from Blind Trial-and-Error to Rigorous Science [70.3658845234978]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have greatly extended the capabilities of Multi-Agent Systems (MAS)<n>Despite this rapid progress, the field still relies heavily on empirical trial-and-error.<n>This bottleneck stems from the ambiguity of attribution.<n>We propose a factor attribution paradigm to systematically identify collaboration-driving factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T04:19:52Z)
• How Do Ports Organise Innovation? Linking Port Governance, Ownership, and Living Labs [36.94429692322632]
  Port studies rarely examine how ownership and decision rights shape the process and outcomes of sustainability and digital pilots.<n>Living Lab (LL) scholarship offers strong concepts, but limited sector-grounded explanation of LL-governance fit in ports.<n>We develop and apply a governance-LL fit framework linking port governance and ownership to four LL pillars: co-creation, real-life setting, iterative learning, and institutional embedding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-11T12:35:17Z)
• A Human Behavioral Baseline for Collective Governance in Software Projects [12.47967674379491]
  We study how open source communities describe participation and control through version controlled governance documents.<n>Using a corpus of 710 projects with paired snapshots, we parse text into actors, rules, actions, and objects, then group them and measure change with entropy for evenness, richness for diversity, and Jensen Shannon divergence for drift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T03:04:46Z)
• Charting Uncertain Waters: A Socio-Technical Framework for Navigating GenAI's Impact on Open Source Communities [53.812795099349295]
  We conduct a scenario-driven, conceptual exploration using a socio-technical framework inspired by McLuhan's Tetrad to surface both risks and opportunities for community resilience amid GenAI-driven disruption of OSS development across four domains: software practices, documentation, community engagement, and governance.<n>By adopting this lens, OSS leaders and researchers can proactively shape the future of their ecosystems, rather than simply reacting to technological upheaval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T22:54:15Z)
• Community Moderation and the New Epistemology of Fact Checking on Social Media [124.26693978503339]
  Social media platforms have traditionally relied on independent fact-checking organizations to identify and flag misleading content.<n>X (formerly Twitter) and Meta have shifted towards community-driven content moderation by launching their own versions of crowd-sourced fact-checking.<n>We examine the current approaches to misinformation detection across major platforms, explore the emerging role of community-driven moderation, and critically evaluate both the promises and challenges of crowd-checking at scale.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T14:50:18Z)
• Beyond Platforms -- Growing Distributed Transaction Networks for Digital Commerce [1.1912965375526179]
  It is not well understood how to evolve, adapt and govern decentralised infrastructures.<n>This article reports empirical research on the development and governance of the Beckn Protocol.<n>It explores how the architecture and governance support local innovation for specific business domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T21:12:51Z)
• Unicorns Do Not Exist: Employing and Appreciating Community Managers in Open Source [0.0]
  Despite playing a crucial role in maintaining open-source software, community managers are often overlooked. We suggest methods to overcome this by stressing the need for the specialisation of roles. Following these guidelines can allow this vital role to be treated with the transparency and respect that it deserves.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-29T07:23:53Z)
• Do We Run How We Say We Run? Formalization and Practice of Governance in OSS Communities [1.922428808969909]
  This study looks at the Apache Software Foundation Incubator program and 208 projects it supports. We assemble a scalable, semantic pipeline to discover and analyze the governance behavior of projects from their mailing lists. Our findings indicate that while communities observe formal requirements and policies as extensively as they are defined, their day-to-day governance focus does not dwell on topics that see most formal policy-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T16:04:11Z)
• Enclosed Loops: How open source communities become datasets [2.4269101271105176]
  Centralization in code hosting and package management in the 2010s created fundamental shifts in the social arrangements of open source ecosystems. In this paper we examine Dependabot, Crater and Copilot as three nascent tools whose existence is predicated on centralized software at scale.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T00:02:25Z)
• Networked Communication for Decentralised Agents in Mean-Field Games [59.01527054553122]
  We introduce networked communication to the mean-field game framework.<n>We prove that our architecture has sample guarantees bounded between those of the centralised- and independent-learning cases.<n>We show that our networked approach has significant advantages over both alternatives in terms of robustness to update failures and to changes in population size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T10:45:39Z)
• Governing online goods: Maturity and formalization in Minecraft, Reddit, and World of Warcraft communities [0.0]
  Building a successful community means governing active populations and limited resources. This study applies institutional analysis frameworks to 80,000 communities across 3 platforms: the sandbox game Minecraft, the MMO game World of Warcraft, and Reddit. We find that online communities employ similar governance styles across platforms, strongly favoring "weak" norms to "strong" requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-02T22:45:21Z)
• Decentralized Control with Graph Neural Networks [147.84766857793247]
  We propose a novel framework using graph neural networks (GNNs) to learn decentralized controllers. GNNs are well-suited for the task since they are naturally distributed architectures and exhibit good scalability and transferability properties. The problems of flocking and multi-agent path planning are explored to illustrate the potential of GNNs in learning decentralized controllers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-29T18:59:14Z)
• A game-theoretic analysis of networked system control for common-pool resource management using multi-agent reinforcement learning [54.55119659523629]
  Multi-agent reinforcement learning has recently shown great promise as an approach to networked system control. Common-pool resources include arable land, fresh water, wetlands, wildlife, fish stock, forests and the atmosphere.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T14:12:26Z)
• Graph Neural Networks for Decentralized Controllers [171.6642679604005]
  Dynamical systems comprised of autonomous agents arise in many relevant problems such as robotics, smart grids, or smart cities. Optimal centralized controllers are readily available but face limitations in terms of scalability and practical implementation. We propose a framework using graph neural networks (GNNs) to learn decentralized controllers from data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-23T13:51:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.