Analyzing Latent Concepts in Code Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.00476v2
• Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2025 23:22:16 GMT
• Title: Analyzing Latent Concepts in Code Language Models
• Authors: Arushi Sharma, Vedant Pungliya, Christopher J. Quinn, Ali Jannesari,
• Abstract summary: We propose Code Concept Analysis (CoCoA): a global post-hoc interpretability framework.<n>CoCoA uncovers emergent lexical, syntactic, and semantic structures in a code language model's representation space.<n>We propose a hybrid annotation pipeline that combines static analysis tool-based syntactic alignment with prompt-engineered large language models.
• Score: 10.214183897113118
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Interpreting the internal behavior of large language models trained on code remains a critical challenge, particularly for applications demanding trust, transparency, and semantic robustness. We propose Code Concept Analysis (CoCoA): a global post-hoc interpretability framework that uncovers emergent lexical, syntactic, and semantic structures in a code language model's representation space by clustering contextualized token embeddings into human-interpretable concept groups. We propose a hybrid annotation pipeline that combines static analysis tool-based syntactic alignment with prompt-engineered large language models (LLMs), enabling scalable labeling of latent concepts across abstraction levels. We analyse the distribution of concepts across layers and across three finetuning tasks. Emergent concept clusters can help identify unexpected latent interactions and be used to identify trends and biases within the model's learned representations. We further integrate LCA with local attribution methods to produce concept-grounded explanations, improving the coherence and interpretability of token-level saliency. Empirical evaluations across multiple models and tasks show that LCA discovers concepts that remain stable under semantic-preserving perturbations (average Cluster Sensitivity Index, CSI = 0.288) and evolve predictably with fine-tuning. In a user study on the programming-language classification task, concept-augmented explanations disambiguated token roles and improved human-centric explainability by 37 percentage points compared with token-level attributions using Integrated Gradients.

Related papers

• Emergent Structured Representations Support Flexible In-Context Inference in Large Language Models [77.98801218316505]
  Large language models (LLMs) exhibit emergent behaviors suggestive of human-like reasoning.<n>We investigate the internal processing of LLMs during in-context concept inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-08T03:14:39Z)
• Concept Component Analysis: A Principled Approach for Concept Extraction in LLMs [51.378834857406325]
  Mechanistic interpretability seeks to mitigate the issues through extracts from large language models.<n>Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as a popular approach for extracting interpretable and monosemantic concepts.<n>We show that SAEs suffer from a fundamental theoretical ambiguity: the well-defined correspondence between LLM representations and human-interpretable concepts remains unclear.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T09:27:05Z)
• Insight: Interpretable Semantic Hierarchies in Vision-Language Encoders [52.94006363830628]
  Language-aligned vision foundation models perform strongly across diverse downstream tasks.<n>Recent works decompose these representations into human-interpretable concepts, but provide poor spatial grounding and are limited to image classification tasks.<n>We propose Insight, a language-aligned concept foundation model that provides fine-grained concepts, which are human-interpretable and spatially grounded in the input image.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T09:57:26Z)
• Explain Before You Answer: A Survey on Compositional Visual Reasoning [74.27548620675748]
  Compositional visual reasoning has emerged as a key research frontier in multimodal AI.<n>This survey systematically reviews 260+ papers from top venues (CVPR, ICCV, NeurIPS, ICML, ACL, etc.)<n>We then catalog 60+ benchmarks and corresponding metrics that probe compositional visual reasoning along dimensions such as grounding accuracy, chain-of-thought faithfulness, and high-resolution perception.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-24T11:01:51Z)
• Enhancing Zero-Shot Image Recognition in Vision-Language Models through Human-like Concept Guidance [41.6755826072905]
  In zero-shot image recognition tasks, humans demonstrate remarkable flexibility in classifying unseen categories.<n>Existing vision-language models often underperform in real-world applications because of sub-optimal prompt engineering.<n>We propose a Concept-guided Human-like Bayesian Reasoning framework to address these issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-20T06:20:13Z)
• Concept Layers: Enhancing Interpretability and Intervenability via LLM Conceptualization [2.163881720692685]
  We introduce a new methodology for incorporating interpretability and intervenability into an existing model by integrating Concept Layers into its architecture.<n>Our approach projects the model's internal vector representations into a conceptual, explainable vector space before reconstructing and feeding them back into the model.<n>We evaluate CLs across multiple tasks, demonstrating that they maintain the original model's performance and agreement while enabling meaningful interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T11:10:19Z)
• Advancing Ante-Hoc Explainable Models through Generative Adversarial Networks [24.45212348373868]
  This paper presents a novel concept learning framework for enhancing model interpretability and performance in visual classification tasks. Our approach appends an unsupervised explanation generator to the primary classifier network and makes use of adversarial training. This work presents a significant step towards building inherently interpretable deep vision models with task-aligned concept representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-09T16:16:16Z)
• Sparsity-Guided Holistic Explanation for LLMs with Interpretable Inference-Time Intervention [53.896974148579346]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved unprecedented breakthroughs in various natural language processing domains. The enigmatic black-box'' nature of LLMs remains a significant challenge for interpretability, hampering transparent and accountable applications. We propose a novel methodology anchored in sparsity-guided techniques, aiming to provide a holistic interpretation of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T19:55:58Z)
• Interpreting Pretrained Language Models via Concept Bottlenecks [55.47515772358389]
  Pretrained language models (PLMs) have made significant strides in various natural language processing tasks. The lack of interpretability due to their black-box'' nature poses challenges for responsible implementation. We propose a novel approach to interpreting PLMs by employing high-level, meaningful concepts that are easily understandable for humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-08T20:41:18Z)
• Concept-Centric Transformers: Enhancing Model Interpretability through Object-Centric Concept Learning within a Shared Global Workspace [1.6574413179773757]
  Concept-Centric Transformers is a simple yet effective configuration of the shared global workspace for interpretability. We show that our model achieves better classification accuracy than all baselines across all problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T06:37:39Z)
• Towards explainable evaluation of language models on the semantic similarity of visual concepts [0.0]
  We examine the behavior of high-performing pre-trained language models, focusing on the task of semantic similarity for visual vocabularies. First, we address the need for explainable evaluation metrics, necessary for understanding the conceptual quality of retrieved instances. Secondly, adversarial interventions on salient query semantics expose vulnerabilities of opaque metrics and highlight patterns in learned linguistic representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-08T11:40:57Z)
• GlanceNets: Interpretabile, Leak-proof Concept-based Models [23.7625973884849]
  Concept-based models (CBMs) combine high-performance and interpretability by acquiring and reasoning with a vocabulary of high-level concepts. We provide a clear definition of interpretability in terms of alignment between the model's representation and an underlying data generation process. We introduce GlanceNets, a new CBM that exploits techniques from disentangled representation learning and open-set recognition to achieve alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-31T08:53:53Z)
• Translational Concept Embedding for Generalized Compositional Zero-shot Learning [73.60639796305415]
  Generalized compositional zero-shot learning means to learn composed concepts of attribute-object pairs in a zero-shot fashion. This paper introduces a new approach, termed translational concept embedding, to solve these two difficulties in a unified framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T21:27:51Z)
• A Minimalist Dataset for Systematic Generalization of Perception, Syntax, and Semantics [131.93113552146195]
  We present a new dataset, Handwritten arithmetic with INTegers (HINT), to examine machines' capability of learning generalizable concepts. In HINT, machines are tasked with learning how concepts are perceived from raw signals such as images. We undertake extensive experiments with various sequence-to-sequence models, including RNNs, Transformers, and GPT-3.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-02T01:32:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.