Linear Causal Discovery with Interventional Constraints

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26342v1
• Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 10:49:25 GMT
• Title: Linear Causal Discovery with Interventional Constraints
• Authors: Zhigao Guo, Feng Dong,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a novel concept in causal discovery called interventional constraints.<n> interventional constraints encode high-level causal knowledge in the form of inequality constraints on causal effects.<n>We evaluate our approach on real-world datasets and demonstrate that integrating interventional constraints improves model accuracy and ensures consistency with established findings.
• Score: 2.5603448256298944
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Incorporating causal knowledge and mechanisms is essential for refining causal models and improving downstream tasks such as designing new treatments. In this paper, we introduce a novel concept in causal discovery, termed interventional constraints, which differs fundamentally from interventional data. While interventional data require direct perturbations of variables, interventional constraints encode high-level causal knowledge in the form of inequality constraints on causal effects. For instance, in the Sachs dataset (Sachs et al.\ 2005), Akt has been shown to be activated by PIP3, meaning PIP3 exerts a positive causal effect on Akt. Existing causal discovery methods allow enforcing structural constraints (for example, requiring a causal path from PIP3 to Akt), but they may still produce incorrect causal conclusions such as learning that "PIP3 inhibits Akt". Interventional constraints bridge this gap by explicitly constraining the total causal effect between variable pairs, ensuring learned models respect known causal influences. To formalize interventional constraints, we propose a metric to quantify total causal effects for linear causal models and formulate the problem as a constrained optimization task, solved using a two-stage constrained optimization method. We evaluate our approach on real-world datasets and demonstrate that integrating interventional constraints not only improves model accuracy and ensures consistency with established findings, making models more explainable, but also facilitates the discovery of new causal relationships that would otherwise be costly to identify.

Related papers

• Data-Driven Information-Theoretic Causal Bounds under Unmeasured Confounding [10.590231532335691]
  We develop a data-driven information-theoretic framework for partial identification of conditional causal effects under unmeasured confounding.<n>Our key theoretical contribution shows that the f-divergence between the observational distribution P(Y | A = a, X = x) and the interventional distribution P(Y | do(A = a), X = x) is upper bounded by a function of the propensity score alone.<n>This result enables sharp partial identification of conditional causal effects directly from observational data, without requiring external sensitivity parameters, auxiliary variables, full structural specifications, or outcome boundedness assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T20:47:48Z)
• Do-PFN: In-Context Learning for Causal Effect Estimation [75.62771416172109]
  We show that Prior-data fitted networks (PFNs) can be pre-trained on synthetic data to predict outcomes.<n>Our approach allows for the accurate estimation of causal effects without knowledge of the underlying causal graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T12:43:57Z)
• Data Fusion for Partial Identification of Causal Effects [62.56890808004615]
  We propose a novel partial identification framework that enables researchers to answer key questions.<n>Is the causal effect positive or negative? and How severe must assumption violations be to overturn this conclusion?<n>We apply our framework to the Project STAR study, which investigates the effect of classroom size on students' third-grade standardized test performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T07:13:01Z)
• Generative Intervention Models for Causal Perturbation Modeling [80.72074987374141]
  In many applications, it is a priori unknown which mechanisms of a system are modified by an external perturbation.<n>We propose a generative intervention model (GIM) that learns to map these perturbation features to distributions over atomic interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T10:37:57Z)
• Enabling Causal Discovery in Post-Nonlinear Models with Normalizing Flows [6.954510776782872]
  Post-nonlinear (PNL) causal models stand out as a versatile and adaptable framework for modeling causal relationships. We introduce CAF-PoNo, harnessing the power of the normalizing flows architecture to enforce the crucial invertibility constraint in PNL models. Our method precisely reconstructs the hidden noise, which plays a vital role in cause-effect identification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-06T07:19:21Z)
• Efficient Transfer Learning via Causal Bounds [8.981637739384674]
  We analyze how causal side-information accelerates online learning, and experiments on data reduction.<n>Our analysis precisely characterizes when how causal side-information accelerates online learning, and experiments on data reduction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T13:24:50Z)
• Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions [63.1354734978244]
  We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables. Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z)
• Active Learning for Optimal Intervention Design in Causal Models [11.294389953686945]
  We develop a causal active learning strategy to identify interventions that are optimal, as measured by the discrepancy between the post-interventional mean of the distribution and a desired target mean. We apply our approach to both synthetic data and single-cell transcriptomic data from Perturb-CITE-seq experiments to identify optimal perturbations that induce a specific cell state transition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-10T20:40:30Z)
• Estimation of Bivariate Structural Causal Models by Variational Gaussian Process Regression Under Likelihoods Parametrised by Normalising Flows [74.85071867225533]
  Causal mechanisms can be described by structural causal models. One major drawback of state-of-the-art artificial intelligence is its lack of explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T14:52:58Z)
• Efficient Causal Inference from Combined Observational and Interventional Data through Causal Reductions [68.6505592770171]
  Unobserved confounding is one of the main challenges when estimating causal effects. We propose a novel causal reduction method that replaces an arbitrary number of possibly high-dimensional latent confounders. We propose a learning algorithm to estimate the parameterized reduced model jointly from observational and interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-08T14:29:07Z)
• Estimating Causal Effects with the Neural Autoregressive Density Estimator [6.59529078336196]
  We use neural autoregressive density estimators to estimate causal effects within the Pearl's do-calculus framework. We show that the approach can retrieve causal effects from non-linear systems without explicitly modeling the interactions between the variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-17T13:12:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.