Are Online Sports Fan Communities Becoming More Offensive? A Quantitative Review of Topics, Trends, and Toxicity of r/PremierLeague

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.27003v1
• Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 21:05:46 GMT
• Title: Are Online Sports Fan Communities Becoming More Offensive? A Quantitative Review of Topics, Trends, and Toxicity of r/PremierLeague
• Abstract summary: We analyzed over 1.1 million comments posted from 2013-2022 on r/PremierLeague on Reddit.<n>The rapid expansion has brought more diverse discussions, but also a worrying rise in negative sentiment and toxicity.
• Score: 0.09558392439655013
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Online communities for sports fans have surged in popularity, with Reddit's r/PremierLeague emerging as a focal point for fans of one of the globe's most celebrated sports leagues. This boom has helped the Premier League make significant inroads into the US market, increasing viewership and sparking greater interest in its matches. Despite the league's broad appeal, there's still a notable gap in understanding its online fan community. Therefore, we analyzed a substantial dataset of over 1.1 million comments posted from 2013-2022 on r/PremierLeague. Our study delves into the sentiment, topics, and toxicity of these discussions, tracking trends over time, aiming to map out the conversation landscape. The rapid expansion has brought more diverse discussions, but also a worrying rise in negative sentiment and toxicity. Additionally, the subreddit has become a venue for users to voice frustrations about broader societal issues like racism, the COVID-19 pandemic, and political tensions.

Related papers

• Catching Stray Balls: Football, fandom, and the impact on digital discourse [0.0]
  This paper examines how emotional responses to football matches influence online discourse across digital spaces on Reddit.<n>It demonstrates that real-world events trigger sentiment shifts that move across communities.<n>Negative sentiment correlates with problematic language; match outcomes directly influence sentiment and posting habits; sentiment can transfer to unrelated communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T13:16:06Z)
• Mapping the Spiral of Silence: Surveying Unspoken Opinions in Online Communities [60.695668356379684]
  We examine the difference between the viewpoints publicly posted in a community and the privately surveyed viewpoints of community members.<n>We find that 72.6% of participants who perceive themselves in the minority remain silent, and are only half as likely to post their viewpoint.<n>These results emphasize how far out of step the opinions we see online may be with the population they purport to represent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-02T23:06:05Z)
• Tracking Patterns in Toxicity and Antisocial Behavior Over User Lifetimes on Large Social Media Platforms [0.0]
  We analyze toxicity over a 14-year time span on nearly 500 million comments from Reddit and Wikipedia.<n>We find that the most toxic behavior on Reddit exhibited in aggregate by the most active users, and the most toxic behavior on Wikipedia exhibited in aggregate by the least active users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T15:45:02Z)
• The Constant in HATE: Analyzing Toxicity in Reddit across Topics and Languages [2.5398014196797605]
  Toxic language remains an ongoing challenge on social media platforms. This paper provides a cross-topic and cross-lingual analysis of toxicity in Reddit conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T14:14:33Z)
• Twits, Toxic Tweets, and Tribal Tendencies: Trends in Politically Polarized Posts on Twitter [5.161088104035108]
  We explore the role that partisanship and affective polarization play in contributing to toxicity on an individual level and a topic level on Twitter/X. After collecting 89.6 million tweets from 43,151 Twitter/X users, we determine how several account-level characteristics, including partisanship, predict how often users post toxic content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-19T17:24:47Z)
• SoccerNet-Caption: Dense Video Captioning for Soccer Broadcasts Commentaries [71.44210436913029]
  We propose a novel task of dense video captioning focusing on the generation of textual commentaries anchored with single timestamps. We present a challenging dataset consisting of almost 37k timestamped commentaries across 715.9 hours of soccer broadcast videos.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-10T13:08:03Z)
• Non-Polar Opposites: Analyzing the Relationship Between Echo Chambers and Hostile Intergroup Interactions on Reddit [66.09950457847242]
  We study the activity of 5.97M Reddit users and 421M comments posted over 13 years. We create a typology of relationships between political communities based on whether their users are toxic to each other.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-25T22:17:07Z)
• Nobody Wants to Work Anymore: An Analysis of r/antiwork and the Interplay between Social and Mainstream Media during the Great Resignation [9.299167002524653]
  r/antiwork is a Reddit community that focuses on the discussion of worker exploitation, labour rights and related left-wing political ideas. In late 2021, r/antiwork became the fastest growing community on Reddit, coinciding with what the mainstream media began referring to as the Great Resignation. We investigate how the r/antiwork community was affected by the exponential increase in subscribers and the media coverage that chronicled its rise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T13:27:14Z)
• Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detection [75.54119209776894]
  We investigate the effect of annotator identities (who) and beliefs (why) on toxic language annotations. We consider posts with three characteristics: anti-Black language, African American English dialect, and vulgarity. Our results show strong associations between annotator identity and beliefs and their ratings of toxicity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-15T18:58:20Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Racism is a Virus: Anti-Asian Hate and Counterspeech in Social Media during the COVID-19 Crisis [51.39895377836919]
  COVID-19 has sparked racism and hate on social media targeted towards Asian communities. We study the evolution and spread of anti-Asian hate speech through the lens of Twitter. We create COVID-HATE, the largest dataset of anti-Asian hate and counterspeech spanning 14 months.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-25T21:58:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.