Comment on "There is No Quantum World" by Jeffrey Bub

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.22965v1
• Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2025 15:12:59 GMT
• Title: Comment on "There is No Quantum World" by Jeffrey Bub
• Authors: Philippe Grangier,
• Abstract summary: Jeffrey Bub presents a discussion of neo-Bohrian interpretations of quantum mechanics.<n>We argue that admitting mathematical infinities in a physical theory is not a problem, if properly done.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In a recent preprint [1] Jeffrey Bub presents a discussion of neo-Bohrian interpretations of quantum mechanics, and also of von Neumann's work on infinite tensor products [2]. He rightfully writes that this work provides a theoretical framework that deflates the measurement problem and justifies Bohr's insistence on the primacy of classical concepts. But then he rejects these ideas, on the basis that the infinity limit is "never reached for any real system composed of a finite number of elementary systems". In this note we present opposite views on two major points: first, admitting mathematical infinities in a physical theory is not a problem, if properly done; second, the critics of [3,4,5] comes with a major misunderstanding of these papers: they don't ask about "the significance of the transition from classical to quantum mechanics", but they start from a physical ontology where classical and quantum physics need each other from the beginning. This is because they postulate that a microscopic physical object (or degree of freedom) always appears as a quantum system, within a classical context. Here we argue why this (neo-Bohrian) position makes sense.

Related papers

• A one-world interpretation of quantum mechanics [0.0]
  We assume that there is an objective classical system, and ask that the standard rules of probability theory apply to it when it interacts with a quantum system.<n>Under mild assumptions, we recover the unitary dynamics, collapse and Born rule postulates from quantum theory.<n>There is no decoherence, because the quantum state remains pure conditioned on the classical trajectory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T08:49:41Z)
• Relativistic quantum mechanics and quantum field theory [0.0]
  relativistic quantum physics differs fundamentally from the non-relativistic wave mechanics.<n>It requires a formalism allowing creation and destruction of particles.<n>This article is a semi-historic account of the intriguing new features which emerge as a part of quantum field theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T13:54:37Z)
• Observation of Quantum Darwinism and the Origin of Classicality with Superconducting Circuits [9.09683951826704]
  How can we rationalize everyday classical observations from an inherently quantum world?<n>Quantum Darwinism offers a compelling framework to explain this emergence of classicality.<n>We observe the highly structured branching quantum states that support classicality and the saturation of quantum mutual information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T13:33:32Z)
• Which features of quantum physics are not fundamentally quantum but are due to indeterminism? [0.0]
  We argue that most of the features, problems, and paradoxes attributed to quantum physics have a classical analogue.<n>What really characterizes non-classical effects are incompatible physical quantities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T18:00:01Z)
• A computational test of quantum contextuality, and even simpler proofs of quantumness [43.25018099464869]
  We show that an arbitrary contextuality game can be compiled into an operational "test of contextuality" involving a single quantum device. Our work can be seen as using cryptography to enforce spatial separation within subsystems of a single quantum device.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T19:30:23Z)
• Quantum identity, content, and context: from classical to non-classical logic [0.0]
  We discuss content and context for quantum properties. We argue that one could be in trouble in applying the classical theory of identity to the quantum domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-30T23:05:16Z)
• Testing quantum theory with thought experiments [4.847980206213335]
  How should one model systems that include agents who are themselves using quantum theory? We give a state-of-the-art overview on quantum thought experiments involving observers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T18:08:23Z)
• Revisiting Quantum Mysteries [0.0]
  In opposition to classical physics, it is impossible to say that an isolated quantum system "owns" a physical property. Some properties of the system, its mass for example, belong to it in a sense close to that of classical physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-30T07:34:09Z)
• Are quantum cryptographic security claims vacuous? [12.970250708769708]
  We explain why Bernstein's reasoning is based on a too "classical" understanding of physics. It follows from known theorems about fault-tolerant quantum computation that quantum physics avoids his conclusion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T18:00:05Z)
• The Concept 'Indistinguishable' [0.0]
  All ordinary matter is made of electrons, protons, neutrons, and photons and they are all indistinguishable particles. The concept of indistinguishable particles has proved elusive, in part because of the interpretational difficulties that afflict quantum theory. I offer a deflationary reading of the concept "indistinguishable" that is identical to the Gibbs concept of "generic phase"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-28T13:42:43Z)
• Preferred basis, decoherence and a quantum state of the Universe [77.34726150561087]
  We review a number of issues in foundations of quantum theory and quantum cosmology. These issues can be considered as a part of the scientific legacy of H.D. Zeh.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-28T18:07:59Z)
• There is only one time [110.83289076967895]
  We draw a picture of physical systems that allows us to recognize what is this thing called "time" We derive the Schr"odinger equation in the first case, and the Hamilton equations of motion in the second one.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T09:54:46Z)
• From a quantum theory to a classical one [117.44028458220427]
  We present and discuss a formal approach for describing the quantum to classical crossover. The method was originally introduced by L. Yaffe in 1982 for tackling large-$N$ quantum field theories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-01T09:16:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.