Let Experts Feel Uncertainty: A Multi-Expert Label Distribution Approach to Probabilistic Time Series Forecasting
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.04678v1
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2026 15:51:02 GMT
- Title: Let Experts Feel Uncertainty: A Multi-Expert Label Distribution Approach to Probabilistic Time Series Forecasting
- Authors: Zhen Zhou, Zhirui Wang, Qi Hong, Yunyang Shi, Ziyuan Gu, Zhiyuan Liu,
- Abstract summary: Time series forecasting in real-world applications requires both high predictive accuracy and interpretable uncertainty quantification.<n>We propose a novel Multi-Expert Learning Distributional Labels (LDL) framework that addresses these challenges.<n>Our approach introduces two complementary methods: (1) Multi-Expert LDL, which employs multiple experts with different learned parameters to capture diverse temporal patterns, and (2) Pattern-Aware LDL-MoE, which explicitly decomposes time series into interpretable components.
- Score: 17.806460485532142
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Time series forecasting in real-world applications requires both high predictive accuracy and interpretable uncertainty quantification. Traditional point prediction methods often fail to capture the inherent uncertainty in time series data, while existing probabilistic approaches struggle to balance computational efficiency with interpretability. We propose a novel Multi-Expert Learning Distributional Labels (LDL) framework that addresses these challenges through mixture-of-experts architectures with distributional learning capabilities. Our approach introduces two complementary methods: (1) Multi-Expert LDL, which employs multiple experts with different learned parameters to capture diverse temporal patterns, and (2) Pattern-Aware LDL-MoE, which explicitly decomposes time series into interpretable components (trend, seasonality, changepoints, volatility) through specialized sub-experts. Both frameworks extend traditional point prediction to distributional learning, enabling rich uncertainty quantification through Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD). We evaluate our methods on aggregated sales data derived from the M5 dataset, demonstrating superior performance compared to baseline approaches. The continuous Multi-Expert LDL achieves the best overall performance, while the Pattern-Aware LDL-MoE provides enhanced interpretability through component-wise analysis. Our frameworks successfully balance predictive accuracy with interpretability, making them suitable for real-world forecasting applications where both performance and actionable insights are crucial.
Related papers
- $φ$-DPO: Fairness Direct Preference Optimization Approach to Continual Learning in Large Multimodal Models [58.217707070069885]
This paper presents a novel Fairness Direct Preference Optimization (FaiDPO or $$-DPO) framework for continual learning in LMMs.<n>We first propose a new continual learning paradigm based on Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to mitigate catastrophic forgetting by aligning learning with pairwise preference signals.<n> Extensive experiments and ablation studies show the proposed $$-DPO achieves State-of-the-Art performance across multiple benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-26T04:14:33Z) - Is More Context Always Better? Examining LLM Reasoning Capability for Time Interval Prediction [15.45305246863211]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in reasoning and prediction across different domains.<n>This paper presents a systematic study investigating whether LLMs can predict time intervals between recurring user actions.<n>We benchmark state-of-the-art LLMs in zero-shot settings against both statistical and machine-learning models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-15T07:18:40Z) - Chronos-2: From Univariate to Universal Forecasting [52.753731922908905]
Chronos-2 is a pretrained model capable of handling univariate, multivariate, and covariate-informed forecasting tasks in a zero-shot manner.<n>It delivers state-of-the-art performance across three comprehensive benchmarks: fev-bench, GIFT-Eval, and Chronos Benchmark II.<n>The in-context learning capabilities of Chronos-2 establish it as a general-purpose forecasting model that can be used "as is" in real-world forecasting pipelines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-17T17:00:53Z) - Multimodal Behavioral Patterns Analysis with Eye-Tracking and LLM-Based Reasoning [12.054910727620154]
Eye-tracking data reveals valuable insights into users' cognitive states but is difficult to analyze due to its structured, non-linguistic nature.<n>This paper presents a multimodal human-AI collaborative framework designed to enhance cognitive pattern extraction from eye-tracking signals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-24T09:49:53Z) - Time Series Forecasting as Reasoning: A Slow-Thinking Approach with Reinforced LLMs [12.295608604703117]
Time-R1 is a two-stage reinforcement fine-tuning framework designed to enhance multi-step reasoning ability of LLMs for time series forecasting.<n>Specifically, the first stage conducts supervised fine-tuning for warmup adaptation, while the second stage employs reinforcement learning to improve the model's generalization ability.<n> Experiments demonstrate that Time-R1 significantly improves forecast performance across diverse datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-12T12:15:50Z) - Winner-takes-all for Multivariate Probabilistic Time Series Forecasting [0.0]
We introduce TimeMCL, a method leveraging the Multiple Choice Learning (MCL) paradigm to forecast plausible time series futures.<n>Our approach employs a neural network with multiple heads and utilizes the Winner-Takes-All (WTA) loss to promote diversity among predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-05T18:56:14Z) - A Multi-scale Representation Learning Framework for Long-Term Time Series Forecasting [6.344911113059126]
Long-term time series forecasting (LTSF) offers broad utility in practical settings like energy consumption and weather prediction.<n>This work confronts key issues in LTSF, including the suboptimal use of multi-granularity information.<n>Our method adeptly disentangles complex temporal dynamics using clear, concurrent predictions across various scales.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-13T03:26:44Z) - TimeXL: Explainable Multi-modal Time Series Prediction with LLM-in-the-Loop [79.5773512667468]
TimeXL is a multi-modal prediction framework that integrates a prototype-based time series encoder with three collaborating Large Language Models.<n>A reflection LLM compares the predicted values against the ground truth, identifying textual inconsistencies or noise.<n>This closed-loop workflow-prediction, critique (reflect), and refinement-continuously boosts the framework's performance and interpretability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-02T20:40:53Z) - Cycles of Thought: Measuring LLM Confidence through Stable Explanations [53.15438489398938]
Large language models (LLMs) can reach and even surpass human-level accuracy on a variety of benchmarks, but their overconfidence in incorrect responses is still a well-documented failure mode.
We propose a framework for measuring an LLM's uncertainty with respect to the distribution of generated explanations for an answer.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-05T16:35:30Z) - Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Demographic Inference with Large Multimodal Models [58.58594658683919]
Large multimodal models (LMMs) have shown transformative potential across various research tasks.
Our findings indicate LMMs possess advantages in zero-shot learning, interpretability, and handling uncurated 'in-the-wild' inputs.
We propose a Chain-of-Thought augmented prompting approach, which effectively mitigates the off-target prediction issue.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-24T16:26:56Z) - CALF: Aligning LLMs for Time Series Forecasting via Cross-modal Fine-Tuning [59.88924847995279]
We propose a novel Cross-Modal LLM Fine-Tuning (CALF) framework for MTSF.<n>To reduce the distribution discrepancy, we develop the cross-modal match module.<n>CALF establishes state-of-the-art performance for both long-term and short-term forecasting tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-12T04:04:38Z) - The Capacity and Robustness Trade-off: Revisiting the Channel
Independent Strategy for Multivariate Time Series Forecasting [50.48888534815361]
We show that models trained with the Channel Independent (CI) strategy outperform those trained with the Channel Dependent (CD) strategy.
Our results conclude that the CD approach has higher capacity but often lacks robustness to accurately predict distributionally drifted time series.
We propose a modified CD method called Predict Residuals with Regularization (PRReg) that can surpass the CI strategy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-11T13:15:33Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.