The Diversity Paradox revisited: Systemic Effects of Feedback Loops in Recommender Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16315v1
• Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 09:52:52 GMT
• Title: The Diversity Paradox revisited: Systemic Effects of Feedback Loops in Recommender Systems
• Authors: Gabriele Barlacchi, Margherita Lalli, Emanuele Ferragina, Fosca Giannotti, Dino Pedreschi, Luca Pappalardo,
• Abstract summary: We propose a feedback-loop model that captures implicit feedback, periodic retraining, and probabilistic adoption of recommendations.<n>We apply the framework on online retail and music streaming data and analyze systemic effects of the feedback loop.<n>Our results highlight the need to move beyond static evaluations and account explicitly for feedback-loop dynamics when designing recommender systems.
• Score: 1.6167794587866464
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recommender systems shape individual choices through feedback loops in which user behavior and algorithmic recommendations coevolve over time. The systemic effects of these loops remain poorly understood, in part due to unrealistic assumptions in existing simulation studies. We propose a feedback-loop model that captures implicit feedback, periodic retraining, probabilistic adoption of recommendations, and heterogeneous recommender systems. We apply the framework on online retail and music streaming data and analyze systemic effects of the feedback loop. We find that increasing recommender adoption may lead to a progressive diversification of individual consumption, while collective demand is redistributed in model- and domain-dependent ways, often amplifying popularity concentration. Temporal analyses further reveal that apparent increases in individual diversity observed in static evaluations are illusory: when adoption is fixed and time unfolds, individual diversity consistently decreases across all models. Our results highlight the need to move beyond static evaluations and explicitly account for feedback-loop dynamics when designing recommender systems.

Related papers

• A Simulation Framework for Studying Systemic Effects of Feedback Loops in Recommender Systems [1.0533049092789448]
  This paper introduces a simulation framework to model recommender systems in online retail environments.<n>We analyze how different recommendation algorithms influence diversity, purchase concentration, and user homogenization over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T16:31:01Z)
• Reinforcement Learning for Durable Algorithmic Recourse [49.54997446851335]
  We present a time-aware framework for algorithmic recourse, explicitly modeling how candidate populations adapt in response to recommendations.<n>We also introduce a novel reinforcement learning (RL)-based recourse algorithm that captures the evolving dynamics of the environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T09:24:12Z)
• Learning Recommender Systems with Soft Target: A Decoupled Perspective [49.83787742587449]
  We propose a novel decoupled soft label optimization framework to consider the objectives as two aspects by leveraging soft labels. We present a sensible soft-label generation algorithm that models a label propagation algorithm to explore users' latent interests in unobserved feedback via neighbors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T04:20:15Z)
• Algorithmic Drift: A Simulation Framework to Study the Effects of Recommender Systems on User Preferences [7.552217586057245]
  We propose a simulation framework that mimics user-recommender system interactions in a long-term scenario. We introduce two novel metrics for quantifying the algorithm's impact on user preferences, specifically in terms of drift over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T21:54:22Z)
• Exploring the Escalation of Source Bias in User, Data, and Recommender System Feedback Loop [65.23044868332693]
  We explore how AI-generated content (AIGC) affects the performance and dynamics of recommender systems.<n>In the short term, bias toward AIGC encourages LLM-based content creation, increasing AIGC content, and causing unfair traffic distribution.<n>We propose a debiasing method based on L1-loss optimization to maintain long-term content ecosystem balance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T09:34:50Z)
• Sequential Recommendation with Controllable Diversification: Representation Degeneration and Diversity [59.24517649169952]
  We argue that the representation degeneration issue is the root cause of insufficient recommendation diversity in existing SR methods. We propose a novel Singular sPectrum sMoothing regularization for Recommendation (SPMRec), which acts as a controllable surrogate to alleviate the degeneration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-21T02:42:37Z)
• Continually Improving Extractive QA via Human Feedback [59.49549491725224]
  We study continually improving an extractive question answering (QA) system via human user feedback. We conduct experiments involving thousands of user interactions under diverse setups to broaden the understanding of learning from feedback over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-21T14:35:32Z)
• A Classification of Feedback Loops and Their Relation to Biases in Automated Decision-Making Systems [0.0]
  We study the different types of feedback loops in the ML-based decision-making pipeline. We find that the existence of feedback loops can perpetuate, reinforce, or even reduce ML biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-10T11:15:22Z)
• Breaking Feedback Loops in Recommender Systems with Causal Inference [99.22185950608838]
  Recent work has shown that feedback loops may compromise recommendation quality and homogenize user behavior. We propose the Causal Adjustment for Feedback Loops (CAFL), an algorithm that provably breaks feedback loops using causal inference. We show that CAFL improves recommendation quality when compared to prior correction methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T17:58:39Z)
• Long-term Dynamics of Fairness Intervention in Connection Recommender Systems [5.048563042541915]
  We study a connection recommender system patterned after the systems employed by web-scale social networks. We find that, although seemingly fair in aggregate, common exposure and utility parity interventions fail to mitigate amplification of biases in the long term.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-30T16:27:48Z)
• PURS: Personalized Unexpected Recommender System for Improving User Satisfaction [76.98616102965023]
  We describe a novel Personalized Unexpected Recommender System (PURS) model that incorporates unexpectedness into the recommendation process. Extensive offline experiments on three real-world datasets illustrate that the proposed PURS model significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art baseline approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-05T01:33:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.