Beyond Means: Topological Causal Effects under Persistent-Homology Ignorability

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14169v1
• Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2026 01:03:32 GMT
• Title: Beyond Means: Topological Causal Effects under Persistent-Homology Ignorability
• Abstract summary: A canonical failure mode occurs when control outcomes are unimodal, treated outcomes become bimodal, and both distributions have the same mean.<n>This paper develops a topological causal framework based on persistent homology.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Average treatment effects (ATE) and conditional average treatment effects (CATE) are foundational causal estimands, but they target changes in expected outcomes and can miss treatment-induced changes in the shape of outcome distributions. A canonical failure mode occurs when control outcomes are unimodal, treated outcomes become bimodal, and both distributions have the same mean. In such cases mean-based causal estimands are zero even though the geometry and topology of the outcome law change substantially. This paper develops a topological causal framework based on persistent homology. We formalize a persistent-homology ignorability condition, define topological analogues of CATE and ATE, and prove that these estimands are identifiable up to an explicit error bound under approximate topological ignorability. We also clarify a subtle but important point: a marginal persistence-diagram effect is not identified from conditional topological ignorability alone because persistent homology does not in general commute with mixtures over covariates. To preserve the original intuition while ensuring scientific correctness, we retain the marginal effect as a motivating quantity, but place the mathematically sound conditional estimands at the center of the theory. A synthetic experiment with mean-preserving topology change shows that mean-based causal estimands remain near zero while the proposed topological effect increases sharply and remains recoverable after adjustment for confounding.

Related papers

• A Mathematical Framework for Topological Causal Data Analysis [5.8010446129208155]
  We introduce emphTopological Causal Data Analysis, a framework separating the observation space, causal-model class, topological representation, and causal query.<n>Topology does not define interventions; it supplies stable, shape-sensitive summaries after causal assumptions have been specified.<n>At the distribution level, we identify targets through the standard causal (g)-formula and derive stability-transfer bounds and plug-in consistency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-30T13:02:11Z)
• Causal Gaussian Processes for Robust Treatment Effect Evaluation with Unobserved Confounding [65.76392290956525]
  This paper investigates causal effect evaluation over the continuous domain from confounded observations.<n>We develop a novel family of Causal Gaussian process (CGP) models that effectively approximate the observational and interventional distributions of any causal model with confounded observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-20T00:05:25Z)
• Topological Ignorability for Structural Causal Effects Beyond Means [0.0]
  Interventions alter the structure of an outcome distribution rather than its mean.<n>Mean-based causal estimands such as the average treatment effect may miss important structural effects.<n>We introduce topological-geometrical causal metrics based on summaries of interventional outcome laws.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-31T11:56:53Z)
• OrthoFormer: Instrumental Variable Estimation in Transformer Hidden States via Neural Control Functions [0.0]
  Transformer architectures excel at sequential modeling yet remain fundamentally limited by correlational learning.<n>We propose OrthoFormer, a causally grounded architecture that embeds instrumental variable estimation directly into Transformer blocks via neural control functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-08T03:05:16Z)
• Topological Causal Effects [4.002004604568088]
  We develop a framework for topological causal inference that defines treatment effects through differences in the topological structure of potential outcomes.<n> Empirical studies illustrate that the proposed method reliably quantifies topological treatment effects across diverse complex outcome types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T13:47:23Z)
• Accounting for Missing Covariates in Heterogeneous Treatment Estimation [17.09751619857397]
  We introduce a novel partial identification strategy based on ideas from ecological inference. We show that our framework can produce bounds that are much tighter than would otherwise be possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T05:47:07Z)
• Causal Discovery of Linear Non-Gaussian Causal Models with Unobserved Confounding [1.6932009464531739]
  We consider linear non-Gaussian structural equation models that involve latent confounding. In this setting, the causal structure is identifiable, but, in general, it is not possible to identify the specific causal effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-09T07:24:12Z)
• Identifiable Latent Neural Causal Models [82.14087963690561]
  Causal representation learning seeks to uncover latent, high-level causal representations from low-level observed data. We determine the types of distribution shifts that do contribute to the identifiability of causal representations. We translate our findings into a practical algorithm, allowing for the acquisition of reliable latent causal representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-23T04:13:55Z)
• Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions [63.1354734978244]
  We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables. Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z)
• Identifying Weight-Variant Latent Causal Models [82.14087963690561]
  We find that transitivity acts as a key role in impeding the identifiability of latent causal representations. Under some mild assumptions, we can show that the latent causal representations can be identified up to trivial permutation and scaling. We propose a novel method, termed Structural caUsAl Variational autoEncoder, which directly learns latent causal representations and causal relationships among them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-30T11:12:59Z)
• Neuro-Symbolic Entropy Regularization [78.16196949641079]
  In structured prediction, the goal is to jointly predict many output variables that together encode a structured object. One approach -- entropy regularization -- posits that decision boundaries should lie in low-probability regions. We propose a loss, neuro-symbolic entropy regularization, that encourages the model to confidently predict a valid object.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-25T06:23:10Z)
• Causal Expectation-Maximisation [70.45873402967297]
  We show that causal inference is NP-hard even in models characterised by polytree-shaped graphs. We introduce the causal EM algorithm to reconstruct the uncertainty about the latent variables from data about categorical manifest variables. We argue that there appears to be an unnoticed limitation to the trending idea that counterfactual bounds can often be computed without knowledge of the structural equations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T10:25:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.