HiMARS: Hybrid multi-objective algorithms for recommender systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.07572v1
- Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2026 20:23:00 GMT
- Title: HiMARS: Hybrid multi-objective algorithms for recommender systems
- Abstract summary: We propose four novel hybrid multi-objective algorithms inspired by the Non-dominated Neighbor Immune Algorithm (NNIA), Archived Multi-Objective Simulated Annealing (AMOSA), and Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II)<n>We evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithms on real-world datasets and compare them with existing methods.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: In recommender systems, it is well-established that both accuracy and diversity are crucial for generating high-quality recommendation lists. However, achieving a balance between these two typically conflicting objectives remains a significant challenge. In this work, we address this challenge by proposing four novel hybrid multi-objective algorithms inspired by the Non-dominated Neighbor Immune Algorithm (NNIA), Archived Multi-Objective Simulated Annealing (AMOSA), and Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II), aimed at simultaneously enhancing both accuracy and diversity through multi-objective optimization. Our approach follows a three-stage process: First, we generate an initial top-$k$ list using item-based collaborative filtering for a given user. Second, we solve a bi-objective optimization problem to identify Pareto-optimal top-$s$ recommendation lists, where $s \ll k$, using the proposed hybrid algorithms. Finally, we select an optimal personalized top-$s$ list from the Pareto-optimal solutions. We evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithms on real-world datasets and compare them with existing methods using conventional metrics in recommender systems such as accuracy, diversity, and novelty. Additionally, we assess the quality of the Pareto frontiers using metrics including the spacing metric, mean ideal distance, diversification metric, and spread of non-dominated solutions. Results demonstrate that some of our proposed algorithms significantly improve both accuracy and diversity, offering a novel contribution to multi-objective optimization in recommender systems.
Related papers
- Parametric Expensive Multi-Objective Optimization via Generative Solution Modeling [34.344228998247225]
This paper introduces the first parametric multi-objective Bayesian that learns this inverse model by alternating between acquisition-driven search and generative models.<n>We theoretically justify the faster convergence by leveraging inter-task synergies through task-aware Gaussian processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-12T15:13:27Z) - A Gradient Meta-Learning Joint Optimization for Beamforming and Antenna Position in Pinching-Antenna Systems [63.213207442368294]
We consider a novel optimization design for multi-waveguide pinching-antenna systems.<n>The proposed GML-JO algorithm is robust to different choices and better performance compared with the existing optimization methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-14T17:35:27Z) - Preference-Guided Diffusion for Multi-Objective Offline Optimization [64.08326521234228]
We propose a preference-guided diffusion model for offline multi-objective optimization.<n>Our guidance is a preference model trained to predict the probability that one design dominates another.<n>Our results highlight the effectiveness of classifier-guided diffusion models in generating diverse and high-quality solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-21T16:49:38Z) - Integrating Chaotic Evolutionary and Local Search Techniques in Decision Space for Enhanced Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization [1.8130068086063336]
This paper focuses on both Single-Objective Multi-Modal Optimization (SOMMOP) and Multi-Objective Optimization (MOO)
In SOMMOP, we integrate chaotic evolution with niching techniques, as well as Persistence-Based Clustering combined with Gaussian mutation.
For MOO, we extend these methods into a comprehensive framework that incorporates Uncertainty-Based Selection, Adaptive Tuning, and introduces a radius ( R ) concept in deterministic crowding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-12T15:18:48Z) - Training Greedy Policy for Proposal Batch Selection in Expensive Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization [52.80408805368928]
We introduce a novel greedy-style subset selection algorithm for batch acquisition.
Our experiments on the red fluorescent proteins show that our proposed method achieves the baseline performance in 1.69x fewer queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-21T05:57:08Z) - Multi-Objective Quality Diversity Optimization [2.4608515808275455]
We propose an extension of the MAP-Elites algorithm in the multi-objective setting: Multi-Objective MAP-Elites (MOME)
Namely, it combines the diversity inherited from the MAP-Elites grid algorithm with the strength of multi-objective optimizations.
We evaluate our method on several tasks, from standard optimization problems to robotics simulations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-07T10:48:28Z) - A survey on multi-objective hyperparameter optimization algorithms for
Machine Learning [62.997667081978825]
This article presents a systematic survey of the literature published between 2014 and 2020 on multi-objective HPO algorithms.
We distinguish between metaheuristic-based algorithms, metamodel-based algorithms, and approaches using a mixture of both.
We also discuss the quality metrics used to compare multi-objective HPO procedures and present future research directions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-23T10:22:30Z) - Choosing the Best of Both Worlds: Diverse and Novel Recommendations
through Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning [68.45370492516531]
We introduce Scalarized Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning (SMORL) for the Recommender Systems (RS) setting.
SMORL agent augments standard recommendation models with additional RL layers that enforce it to simultaneously satisfy three principal objectives: accuracy, diversity, and novelty of recommendations.
Our experimental results on two real-world datasets reveal a substantial increase in aggregate diversity, a moderate increase in accuracy, reduced repetitiveness of recommendations, and demonstrate the importance of reinforcing diversity and novelty as complementary objectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-28T13:22:45Z) - A novel multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition and
multi-reference points strategy [14.102326122777475]
Multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition (MOEA/D) has been regarded as a significantly promising approach for solving multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs)
We propose an improved MOEA/D algorithm by virtue of the well-known Pascoletti-Serafini scalarization method and a new strategy of multi-reference points.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-27T02:07:08Z) - Surrogate-Assisted Reference Vector Adaptation to Various Pareto Front
Shapes for Many-Objective Bayesian Optimization [0.0]
We propose a surrogate-assisted reference vector adaptation (SRVA) method to solve expensive multi- and many-objective optimization problems.
The proposed algorithm is compared with two other MBO algorithms by applying them to benchmark problems.
Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms the other two in the problems whose objective functions are reasonably approximated by the Kriging models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-10T03:05:12Z) - Momentum Accelerates the Convergence of Stochastic AUPRC Maximization [80.8226518642952]
We study optimization of areas under precision-recall curves (AUPRC), which is widely used for imbalanced tasks.
We develop novel momentum methods with a better iteration of $O (1/epsilon4)$ for finding an $epsilon$stationary solution.
We also design a novel family of adaptive methods with the same complexity of $O (1/epsilon4)$, which enjoy faster convergence in practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-02T16:21:52Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.