Expert-Annotated Embryo Image Dataset with Natural Language Descriptions for Evidence-Based Patient Communication in IVF
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16528v1
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 17:05:54 GMT
- Title: Expert-Annotated Embryo Image Dataset with Natural Language Descriptions for Evidence-Based Patient Communication in IVF
- Abstract summary: We present an expert-annotated dataset consisting of embryo images and corresponding morphological description using natural language.<n>Our proposed dataset supports research in language-based, interpretable, and transparent automated embryo assessment.
- Score: 0.09381376621526816
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Embryo selection is one of multiple crucial steps in in-vitro fertilization, commonly based on morphological assessment by clinical embryologists. Although artificial intelligence methods have demonstrated their potential to support embryo selection by automated embryo ranking or grading methods, the overall impact of AI-based solutions is still limited. This is mainly due to the required adaptation of automated solutions to custom clinical data, reliance on time lapse incubators and a lack of interpretability to understand AI reasoning. The modern, informed patient is questioning expert decisions, particularly if the treatment is not successful. Thus, evidence-based decision justification in tasks like embryo selection would support transparent decision making and respectful patient communication. To support this aim, we hereby present an expert-annotated dataset consisting of embryo images and corresponding morphological description using natural language. The description contains relevant information on embryonic cell cycle, developmental stage and morphological features. This dataset enables the finetuning of modern foundational vision-language models to learn and improve over time with high accuracy. Predicted embryo descriptions can then be leveraged to automatically extract scientific evidence from literature, facilitating well-informed, evidence-based decision-making and transparent communication with patients. Our proposed dataset supports research in language-based, interpretable, and transparent automated embryo assessment and has the potential to enhance the decision-making process and improve patient outcomes significantly over time.
Related papers
- From Prediction to Intervention: The Evolution of AI in Biomedicine [67.45502291821956]
We argue that AI in biomedicine is undergoing a structural transition.<n>We define disease-level models as systems that explicitly represent the state, dynamics, and intervention response of biological processes.<n>It follows directly from the structure of biomedical decision-making and defines the next stage of AI in medicine.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-14T17:49:51Z) - EvoClinician: A Self-Evolving Agent for Multi-Turn Medical Diagnosis via Test-Time Evolutionary Learning [72.70291772077738]
We propose Med-Inquire, a new benchmark designed to evaluate an agent's ability to perform multi-turn diagnosis.<n>We then introduce EvoClinician, a self-evolving agent that learns efficient diagnostic strategies at test time.<n>Our experiments show EvoClinician outperforms continual learning baselines and other self-evolving agents like memory agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-30T13:26:18Z) - Timely Clinical Diagnosis through Active Test Selection [49.091903570068155]
We propose ACTMED (Adaptive Clinical Test selection via Model-based Experimental Design) to better emulate real-world diagnostic reasoning.<n>LLMs act as flexible simulators, generating plausible patient state distributions and supporting belief updates without requiring structured, task-specific training data.<n>We evaluate ACTMED on real-world datasets and show it can optimize test selection to improve diagnostic accuracy, interpretability, and resource use.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-21T18:10:45Z) - Medical Reasoning in the Era of LLMs: A Systematic Review of Enhancement Techniques and Applications [59.721265428780946]
Large Language Models (LLMs) in medicine have enabled impressive capabilities, yet a critical gap remains in their ability to perform systematic, transparent, and verifiable reasoning.<n>This paper provides the first systematic review of this emerging field.<n>We propose a taxonomy of reasoning enhancement techniques, categorized into training-time strategies and test-time mechanisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-01T14:41:31Z) - GEMeX-RMCoT: An Enhanced Med-VQA Dataset for Region-Aware Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [60.03671205298294]
Medical visual question answering aims to support clinical decision-making by enabling models to answer natural language questions based on medical images.<n>Current methods still suffer from limited answer reliability and poor interpretability.<n>This work first proposes a Region-Aware Multimodal Chain-of-Thought dataset, in which the process of producing an answer is preceded by a sequence of intermediate reasoning steps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-22T08:09:58Z) - Leveraging AI for Automatic Classification of PCOS Using Ultrasound Imaging [0.0]
The AUTO-PCOS Classification Challenge seeks to advance the diagnostic capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) in identifying Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS)<n>This report outlines our methodology for building a robust AI pipeline utilizing transfer learning with the InceptionV3 architecture to achieve high accuracy in binary classification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-30T11:56:11Z) - Leveraging Large Language Models through Natural Language Processing to provide interpretable Machine Learning predictions of mental deterioration in real time [5.635300481123079]
Based on official estimates, 50 million people worldwide are affected by dementia, and this number increases by 10 million new patients every year.
To this end, Artificial Intelligence and computational linguistics can be exploited for natural language analysis, personalized assessment, monitoring, and treatment.
We contribute with an affordable, flexible, non-invasive, personalized diagnostic system to this work.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-05T09:27:05Z) - Can Generative AI Support Patients' & Caregivers' Informational Needs? Towards Task-Centric Evaluation Of AI Systems [0.7124736158080937]
We develop an evaluation paradigm that centers human understanding and decision-making.<n>We study the utility of generative AI systems in supporting people in a concrete task.<n>We evaluate two state-of-the-art generative AI systems against the radiologist's responses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-31T23:24:37Z) - Clairvoyance: A Pipeline Toolkit for Medical Time Series [95.22483029602921]
Time-series learning is the bread and butter of data-driven *clinical decision support*
Clairvoyance proposes a unified, end-to-end, autoML-friendly pipeline that serves as a software toolkit.
Clairvoyance is the first to demonstrate viability of a comprehensive and automatable pipeline for clinical time-series ML.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-28T12:08:03Z) - Exploring the Role of Explainability in AI-Assisted Embryo Selection [0.0]
In Vitro Fertilization is among the most widespread treatments for infertility.
One of its main challenges is the evaluation and selection of embryo for implantation.
Deep learning based methods are gaining attention, but their opaque nature compromises their acceptance in the clinical context.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-01T09:46:31Z) - Rationale production to support clinical decision-making [31.66739991129112]
We apply InfoCal to the task of predicting hospital readmission using hospital discharge notes.
We find each presented model with selected interpretability or feature importance methods yield varying results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-15T09:02:10Z) - Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised
Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks.
Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets.
We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.