A Probabilistic Consensus-Driven Approach for Robust Counterfactual Explanations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17494v1
• Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2026 15:31:18 GMT
• Title: A Probabilistic Consensus-Driven Approach for Robust Counterfactual Explanations
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel approach that jointly models the data distribution and the space of plausible model decisions to ensure robustness to model changes.<n>Our method effectively pushes CFEs toward regions that are both plausible and stable across model changes.
• Score: 2.4788097726838667
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Counterfactual explanations (CFEs) are essential for interpreting black-box models, yet they often become invalid when models are slightly changed. Existing methods for generating robust CFEs are often limited to specific types of models, require costly tuning, or inflexible robustness controls. We propose a novel approach that jointly models the data distribution and the space of plausible model decisions to ensure robustness to model changes. Using a probabilistic consensus over a model ensemble, we train a conditional normalizing flow that captures the data density under varying levels of classifier agreement. At inference time, a single interpretable parameter controls the robustness level; it specifies the minimum fraction of models that should agree on the target class without retraining the generative model. Our method effectively pushes CFEs toward regions that are both plausible and stable across model changes. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach achieves superior empirical robustness while also maintaining good performance across other evaluation measures.

Related papers

• Model Correlation Detection via Random Selection Probing [62.093777777813756]
  Existing similarity-based methods require access to model parameters or produce scores without thresholds.<n>We introduce Random Selection Probing (RSP), a hypothesis-testing framework that formulates model correlation detection as a statistical test.<n>RSP produces rigorous p-values that quantify evidence of correlation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T01:40:26Z)
• Conformalized Exceptional Model Mining: Telling Where Your Model Performs (Not) Well [31.013018198280506]
  This paper introduces a novel framework, Conformalized Exceptional Model Mining.<n>It combines the rigor of Conformal Prediction with the explanatory power of Exceptional Model Mining.<n>We develop a new model class, mSMoPE, which quantifies uncertainty through conformal prediction's rigorous coverage guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-21T13:43:14Z)
• On conditional diffusion models for PDE simulations [53.01911265639582]
  We study score-based diffusion models for forecasting and assimilation of sparse observations. We propose an autoregressive sampling approach that significantly improves performance in forecasting. We also propose a new training strategy for conditional score-based models that achieves stable performance over a range of history lengths.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T18:31:04Z)
• SMILE: Zero-Shot Sparse Mixture of Low-Rank Experts Construction From Pre-Trained Foundation Models [85.67096251281191]
  We present an innovative approach to model fusion called zero-shot Sparse MIxture of Low-rank Experts (SMILE) construction. SMILE allows for the upscaling of source models into an MoE model without extra data or further training. We conduct extensive experiments across diverse scenarios, such as image classification and text generation tasks, using full fine-tuning and LoRA fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T17:32:15Z)
• Counterfactual Explanations with Probabilistic Guarantees on their Robustness to Model Change [4.239829789304117]
  Counterfactual explanations (CFEs) guide users on how to adjust inputs to machine learning models to achieve desired outputs.<n>Current methods addressing this issue often support only specific models or change types.<n>This paper proposes a novel approach for generating CFEs that provides probabilistic guarantees for any model and change type.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-09T03:35:53Z)
• FD-Align: Feature Discrimination Alignment for Fine-tuning Pre-Trained Models in Few-Shot Learning [21.693779973263172]
  In this paper, we introduce a fine-tuning approach termed Feature Discrimination Alignment (FD-Align) Our method aims to bolster the model's generalizability by preserving the consistency of spurious features. Once fine-tuned, the model can seamlessly integrate with existing methods, leading to performance improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T17:12:01Z)
• Investigating Ensemble Methods for Model Robustness Improvement of Text Classifiers [66.36045164286854]
  We analyze a set of existing bias features and demonstrate there is no single model that works best for all the cases. By choosing an appropriate bias model, we can obtain a better robustness result than baselines with a more sophisticated model design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-28T17:52:10Z)
• Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Conservative Model-Based Actor-Critic [67.00475077281212]
  Model-based reinforcement learning algorithms are more sample efficient than their model-free counterparts. We propose a novel approach that achieves high sample efficiency without the strong reliance on accurate learned models. We show that CMBAC significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in terms of sample efficiency on several challenging tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-16T15:33:11Z)
• Revisiting Design Choices in Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning [39.01805509055988]
  Offline reinforcement learning enables agents to leverage large pre-collected datasets of environment transitions to learn control policies. This paper compares and designs novel protocols to investigate their interaction with other hyper parameters, such as the number of models, or imaginary rollout horizon.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-08T13:51:34Z)
• Distributional Depth-Based Estimation of Object Articulation Models [21.046351215949525]
  We propose a method that efficiently learns distributions over articulation model parameters directly from depth images. Our core contributions include a novel representation for distributions over rigid body transformations. We introduce a novel deep learning based approach, DUST-net, that performs category-independent articulation model estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-12T17:44:51Z)
• Autoregressive Score Matching [113.4502004812927]
  We propose autoregressive conditional score models (AR-CSM) where we parameterize the joint distribution in terms of the derivatives of univariable log-conditionals (scores) For AR-CSM models, this divergence between data and model distributions can be computed and optimized efficiently, requiring no expensive sampling or adversarial training. We show with extensive experimental results that it can be applied to density estimation on synthetic data, image generation, image denoising, and training latent variable models with implicit encoders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-24T07:01:24Z)
• Control as Hybrid Inference [62.997667081978825]
  We present an implementation of CHI which naturally mediates the balance between iterative and amortised inference. We verify the scalability of our algorithm on a continuous control benchmark, demonstrating that it outperforms strong model-free and model-based baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-11T19:44:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.