The extended Wigner's friend, many- and single-worlds and reasoning from observation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08375v1
• Date: Fri, 08 May 2026 18:31:54 GMT
• Title: The extended Wigner's friend, many- and single-worlds and reasoning from observation
• Abstract summary: It is argued that: (i) it is questionable whether the approximation of the isolated system is valid when measurement-like processes are involved; (ii) one may infer, from Frauchiger and Renner's thought-experiment, that any interpretation of quantum theory involving *subjective collapse* fails; (iii) this does not distinguish single-world from many-world (relative-state) interpretations of quantum theory; (iv) reasoning from observations has to take into account the possible quantum-erasure of those observations if it is to be valid reasoning; (v) a single-world interpretation is valid if certain kinds
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The concept of an isolated system, and Frauchiger and Renner's extended `Wigner's friend' scenario are discussed. It is argued that: (i) it is questionable whether the approximation of the isolated system is valid when measurement-like processes are involved; (ii) one may infer, from Frauchiger and Renner's thought-experiment, and similar thought-experiments, that any interpretation of quantum theory involving *subjective collapse* fails; (iii) this does not distinguish single-world from many-world (relative-state) interpretations of quantum theory; (iv) reasoning from observations has to take into account the possible quantum-erasure of those observations if it is to be valid reasoning; (v) a single-world interpretation is valid if certain kinds of outcome are not quantum-erased in the future.

Related papers

• An interpretation-independent formulation of the measurement problem [0.0]
  We do not try to solve the measurement problem, but rather to properly formulate it.<n>We identify the common root of the puzzle in an interpretation-independent way.<n>We argue that it allows to: (i) shed a new light on the variety of interpretations; (ii) propose a fundamental reason why quantum mechanics and general relativity are so incompatible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-03T06:12:48Z)
• Operational interpretation of the reverse sandwiched Renyi divergences in composite quantum hypothesis testing [40.82628972269358]
  We study the Hoeffding regime of composite quantum hypothesis testing, in which each hypothesis is specified by a sequence of sets of quantum states.<n>We find that passing from simple to composite hypotheses can fundamentally change which quantum divergence determines the operational limits of discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-04T04:02:55Z)
• Experiment to test the incompleteness of quantum mechanics [45.88028371034407]
  We propose an experiment to test the incompleteness of the standard quantum formalism.<n>We show with simulations that the transmission densities in the standard interpretation and in the double solution interpretation give very different results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-05T08:02:14Z)
• From Quantum Cognition to Conceptuality Interpretation II: Unraveling the Quantum Mysteries [0.0]
  An overview of the conceptuality interpretation of quantum mechanics is presented, along with an explanation of how it sheds light on key quantum and relativistic phenomena.<n>We show how the interpretation clarifies Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, wave function-based and entanglement-based nonlocality, interference effects resulting from the superposition principle, delayed choice experiments, quantum measurements, the mechanism of quantization.<n>We argue that the interpretation can also elucidate relativistic effects, focusing on time dilation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T06:05:25Z)
• A computational test of quantum contextuality, and even simpler proofs of quantumness [43.25018099464869]
  We show that an arbitrary contextuality game can be compiled into an operational "test of contextuality" involving a single quantum device. Our work can be seen as using cryptography to enforce spatial separation within subsystems of a single quantum device.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T19:30:23Z)
• What Does '(Non)-Absoluteness of Observed Events' Mean? [0.0]
  We argue that the Wigner's friend paradox, the theorem of Bong et al and the theorem of Lawrence et al are all best understood as demonstrating that if quantum mechanics is universal. We also argue that these theorems taken together suggest interesting possibilities for a different kind of relational approach in which dynamical states are relativized whilst observed events are absolute.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-06T17:13:31Z)
• A Measure-Theoretic Axiomatisation of Causality [55.6970314129444]
  We argue in favour of taking Kolmogorov's measure-theoretic axiomatisation of probability as the starting point towards an axiomatisation of causality. Our proposed framework is rigorously grounded in measure theory, but it also sheds light on long-standing limitations of existing frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T13:15:48Z)
• On the Interpretation of Quantum Indistinguishability : a No-Go Theorem [0.0]
  Physicists are yet to reach a consensus on the interpretation of a quantum wavefunction. We show that quantum mechanical prediction of maximal violation of Mermin inequality is incompatible with all ontological interpretations for quantum theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-20T18:39:25Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
  We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world. We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z)
• Impossibility of creating a superposition of unknown quantum states [16.467540842571328]
  We show that the existence of a protocol that superposes two unknown pure states with nonzero probability leads to violation of other no-go theorems. Such a protocol can be used to perform certain state discrimination and cloning tasks that are forbidden in quantum theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T13:25:42Z)
• Quantum Mechanical description of Bell's experiment assumes Locality [91.3755431537592]
  Bell's experiment description assumes the (Quantum Mechanics-language equivalent of the classical) condition of Locality. This result is complementary to a recently published one demonstrating that non-Locality is necessary to describe said experiment. It is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is absolutely no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-27T15:04:08Z)
• A strong no-go theorem on the Wigner's friend paradox [0.0]
  We prove that if quantum evolution is controllable on the scale of an observer, then one of 'No-Superdeterminism', 'Locality' or 'Absoluteness of Observed Events' must be false. We show that although the violation of Bell-type inequalities in such scenarios is not in general sufficient to demonstrate the contradiction between those three assumptions, new inequalities can be derived in a theory-independent manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-07-12T08:09:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.