An interpretation-independent formulation of the measurement problem

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03409v1
• Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 06:12:48 GMT
• Title: An interpretation-independent formulation of the measurement problem
• Abstract summary: We do not try to solve the measurement problem, but rather to properly formulate it.<n>We identify the common root of the puzzle in an interpretation-independent way.<n>We argue that it allows to: (i) shed a new light on the variety of interpretations; (ii) propose a fundamental reason why quantum mechanics and general relativity are so incompatible.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: In this paper, we do not try to solve the measurement problem, but rather to properly formulate it. One of the reasons why it still lacks a precise, agreed definition is that the problem may take very different aspects depending on the interpretation of quantum mechanics embraced. Inspired by the methodology of theory-independent results like Bell's theorem, we propose to identify the common root of the puzzle in an interpretation-independent way i.e. as a property of the empirical statistics only, before deriving its philosophical consequences. The key observation is that quantum matter can not be described by a Kolmogorovian probabilistic theory. Arguing that the Kolmogorov axioms of probability theory are the postulates of epistemic uncertainty leads us to reformulate the measurement problem as the impossibility to build an ontology independent of epistemology for quantum matter. Said differently, there exists no God's-eye view on quantum systems. Although it is meaningless to solve the measurement problem as defined in this way, insofar as it is a feature of the universe's statistics, such a formulation may on the other hand bring side benefits. In particular, we argue that it allows to: (i) shed a new light on the variety of interpretations; (ii) propose a fundamental reason why quantum mechanics and general relativity are so incompatible, not relying on purely mathematical or technical arguments; (iii) guide the quest for quantum gravity.

Related papers

• A Pragmatist Understanding of Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
  We can understand quantum mechanics by understanding how we have applied it.<n>When applied to a quantum state, quantum mechanics yields probabiities for physical events.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-02T15:51:51Z)
• A decision-theoretic approach to dealing with uncertainty in quantum mechanics [39.146761527401424]
  We provide a decision-theoretic framework for dealing with uncertainty in quantum mechanics.<n>We show that measurements play the role of acts with an uncertain outcome.<n>We discuss the mathematical implications of our findings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T14:53:06Z)
• Resolving the Quantum Measurement Problem through Leveraging the Uncertainty Principle [0.0]
  The Schrodinger equation is incomplete, inherently unable to explain the collapse of the wavefunction caused by measurement.<n>We show that in phase space quantum mechanics, uncertainty can be arbitrarily adjusted by tuning the observation window.<n>Our framework bridges seemingly disparate concepts such as classical mechanics, quantum mechanics, decoherence, and measurement within intrinsic quantum mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-13T19:56:21Z)
• The composition rule for quantum systems is not the only possible one [0.0]
  We argue that the composition postulate deserves to be experimentally scrutinised independently of the other features of quantum theory.<n>We formulate a family of operational theories that are solely distinguished from standard quantum theory by their system-composition rule.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-24T19:31:13Z)
• The measurement postulates of quantum mechanics are not redundant [0.0]
  Masanes, Galley and M"uller argue that the measurement postulates of non-relativistic quantum mechanics follow from the structural postulates.<n>We refute their conclusion, giving explicit examples of non-quantum measurement and state update rules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-12T14:30:36Z)
• The measurement problem in the light of the theory of decoherence [0.0]
  This paper proposes an exhaustive solution to the measurement problem in view of the theory of decoherence. Considering the latter as a probabilistic theory all along allows us to avoid the usual probability problem of the many-worlds interpretations. A thorough verification of the consistency of quantum mechanics at all scales is proposed, as well as a discussion of what can be deemed an observer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-06T19:47:52Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• On the relation between quantum theory and probability [0.0]
  The theory of probability and the quantum theory, the one mathematical and the other physical, are related in that each admits a number of very different interpretations. It has been proposed that the conceptual problems of the quantum theory could be, if not resolved, at least mitigated by a proper interpretation of probability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-19T15:24:19Z)
• Consistency in the description of quantum measurement: Quantum theory can consistently describe the use of itself [8.122270502556372]
  I propose a slight addition to standard textbook quantum mechanics, in the form of two rules, which avoids the paradox. The first specifies when a given quantum dynamics can be interpreted as a measurement. The second requires that a joint context be used to determine whether several different dynamical evolutions can all be interpreted as measurement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T18:00:15Z)
• Experimental study of quantum uncertainty from lack of information [3.901856932788151]
  The uncertainty in the classical domain comes from the lack of information about the exact state of the system. In this paper we investigate the issue experimentally by implementing the corresponding two-dimensional and three-dimensional guessing games. Our results confirm that within the guessing-game framework, the quantum uncertainty to a large extent relies on the fact that quantum information determining the key properties of the game is stored in the degrees of freedom that remain inaccessible to the guessing party.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-19T09:15:27Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Gentle Measurement as a Principle of Quantum Theory [9.137554315375919]
  We propose the gentle measurement principle (GMP) as one of the principles at the foundation of quantum mechanics. We show, within the framework of general probabilistic theories, that GMP imposes strong restrictions on the law of physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-28T11:59:49Z)
• The quantum mechanics needs the principle of wave function collapse, but this principle should not be misunderstood [0.0]
  The postulate of the collapse of the wave function stands between the microscopic, quantum world, and the macroscopic world. It is also proved here that the idea of collapse at a distance is problematic especially in relativistic cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-19T16:07:15Z)
• Impossibility of creating a superposition of unknown quantum states [16.467540842571328]
  We show that the existence of a protocol that superposes two unknown pure states with nonzero probability leads to violation of other no-go theorems. Such a protocol can be used to perform certain state discrimination and cloning tasks that are forbidden in quantum theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T13:25:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.