Mapping AI Programs in the U.S: A Status Report from Early 2026 and an Analysis of AI Majors and Minors

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12428v1
• Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 20:01:25 GMT
• Title: Mapping AI Programs in the U.S: A Status Report from Early 2026 and an Analysis of AI Majors and Minors
• Abstract summary: We present a report on the status of undergraduate Artificial Intelligence (AI) programs in the United States in Spring 2026.<n>We describe our scraping and mapping tools, which dynamically update to track the state of AI education in the U.S.<n>We offer three important contributions: 1) a record of AI programs in the U.S. at a time of great upheaval; 2) a tool to explore AI programs and their requirements; and 3) an analysis of the courses required for 66 AI majors and 87 AI minors.
• Score: 0.1466043528699457
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We present a report on the status of undergraduate Artificial Intelligence (AI) programs in the United States in Spring 2026. In so doing, we 1) describe our scraping and mapping tools, which dynamically update to track the state of AI education in the U.S., and 2) create a historic record at a time of great upheaval. The tool we developed, available at https://cicmap.ai, detects, scrapes, and displays data from more than 350 undergraduate AI programs--majors, minors, concentrations, and certificates--at 4-year universities. Our tool searched over 560 institutions to locate these programs, a sample that represents 86\% of all undergraduate Computer Science (CS) graduates in the U.S. This tool allows prospective students, guidance counselors, administrators, and faculty to easily access AI program requirements and is designed to continually update as new programs emerge. To the best of our knowledge, this survey represents the most comprehensive snapshot of the state of AI programs in the U.S. to date. With this work we offer three important contributions: 1) a record of AI programs in the U.S. at a time of great upheaval; 2) a tool to explore AI programs and their requirements; and 3) an analysis of the courses required for 66 AI majors and 87 AI minors. Our analysis of majors and minors shows great variability in the size and the requirements of these degrees, but we note two takeaways. First, not all majors require a general AI course, but if they don't, they do require a Machine Learning (ML) course. Second, while more than a third of majors require an Ethics in AI course, just under a quarter of AI minors do.

Related papers

• Reshaping Undergraduate Computer Science Education in the Generative AI Era [85.78707817763434]
  Generative AI represents a turning point for Computer Science (CS) education.<n>To keep pace with advances in AI technology, CS curricula should consider a shift toward understanding and verifying AI-generated artifacts.<n>We believe that to effectively prepare future computer science graduates, capable of creating, solving problems, and managing, as well as co-creating, artifacts with AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-02T05:26:24Z)
• Excited, Skeptical, or Worried? A Multi-Institutional Study of Student Views on Generative AI in Computing Education [1.1433339874669624]
  We present the results of a multi-institutional survey with responses from 410 students enrolled in the computing programs of 23 educational institutions.<n>Students from all types express excitement, optimism, and gratitude toward GenAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-03T15:34:44Z)
• Challenges and Paths Towards AI for Software Engineering [55.95365538122656]
  We discuss progress in AI for software engineering in threefold manner.<n>First, we provide a structured taxonomy of concrete tasks in AI for software engineering.<n>Second, we outline several key bottlenecks that limit current approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-28T17:17:57Z)
• Could ChatGPT get an Engineering Degree? Evaluating Higher Education Vulnerability to AI Assistants [176.39275404745098]
  We evaluate whether two AI assistants, GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, can adequately answer assessment questions.<n>GPT-4 answers an average of 65.8% of questions correctly, and can even produce the correct answer across at least one prompting strategy for 85.1% of questions.<n>Our results call for revising program-level assessment design in higher education in light of advances in generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T12:11:49Z)
• Visions of a Discipline: Analyzing Introductory AI Courses on YouTube [11.209406323898019]
  We analyze the 20 most watched introductory AI courses on YouTube. Introductory AI courses do not meaningfully engage with ethical or societal challenges of AI. We recommend that introductory AI courses should highlight ethical challenges of AI to present a more balanced perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T01:48:42Z)
• Artificial intelligence adoption in the physical sciences, natural sciences, life sciences, social sciences and the arts and humanities: A bibliometric analysis of research publications from 1960-2021 [73.06361680847708]
  In 1960 14% of 333 research fields were related to AI, but this increased to over half of all research fields by 1972, over 80% by 1986 and over 98% in current times. In 1960 14% of 333 research fields were related to AI (many in computer science), but this increased to over half of all research fields by 1972, over 80% by 1986 and over 98% in current times. We conclude that the context of the current surge appears different, and that interdisciplinary AI application is likely to be sustained.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T14:08:07Z)
• Artificial Intelligence and Life in 2030: The One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence [74.2630823914258]
  The report examines eight domains of typical urban settings on which AI is likely to have impact over the coming years. It aims to provide the general public with a scientifically and technologically accurate portrayal of the current state of AI. The charge for this report was given to the panel by the AI100 Standing Committee, chaired by Barbara Grosz of Harvard University.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T18:35:36Z)
• Towards Systems Education for Artificial Intelligence: A Course Practice in Intelligent Computing Architectures [6.440694188229122]
  This course aims to teach students for designing AI accelerators on FPGA platforms. The elaborated course contents include lecture notes and related technical materials. Some teaching experiences and effects are discussed as well as some potential improvements in the future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-22T11:48:04Z)
• The application of artificial intelligence in software engineering: a review challenging conventional wisdom [0.9651131604396904]
  This survey chapter is a review of the most commonplace methods of AI applied to software engineering. The review covers methods between years 1975-2017, for the requirements phase, 46 major AI-driven methods are found. The purpose of this chapter is to answer the following questions: is there sufficient intelligence in the SE lifecycle?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-03T15:59:59Z)
• Software Engineering for AI-Based Systems: A Survey [8.550158373713906]
  There is limited synthesized knowledge on Software Engineering approaches for building, operating, and maintaining AI-based systems. SE for AI-based systems is an emerging research area, where more than 2/3 of the studies have been published since 2018. The most studied properties of AI-based systems are dependability and safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-05T11:22:08Z)
• Empowering Things with Intelligence: A Survey of the Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities in Artificial Intelligence of Things [98.10037444792444]
  We show how AI can empower the IoT to make it faster, smarter, greener, and safer. First, we present progress in AI research for IoT from four perspectives: perceiving, learning, reasoning, and behaving. Finally, we summarize some promising applications of AIoT that are likely to profoundly reshape our world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-17T13:14:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.