The Legibility Gap: How Gender Equity Interventions Redistribute Recognition Across Cultures

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20827v1
• Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 07:45:56 GMT
• Title: The Legibility Gap: How Gender Equity Interventions Redistribute Recognition Across Cultures
• Abstract summary: Efforts to promote gender equity in science increasingly rely on name-based inference.<n> linguistic cues that signal gender vary across cultures and are often obscured when names are transliterated into English.<n>We show how equity interventions systematically benefit women whose names signal gender while bypassing those whose names lose such cues in translation.
• Score: 11.618277254028238
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Efforts to promote gender equity in science increasingly rely on name-based inference to quantify representation and guide policy and behavior. Yet linguistic cues that signal gender vary across cultures and are often obscured when names are transliterated into English. Here we identify a pattern we call the "legibility gap": when gender is inferred from names, equity interventions systematically benefit women whose names signal gender while bypassing those whose names lose such cues in translation. Using both observational and experimental evidence, we show how this gap reshapes recognition in science. Analyzing citation diversity statements-an emerging practice in which authors report the algorithmically estimated gender composition of their reference lists-we find that papers that include this practice cite women more frequently, but the gains accrue almost entirely to authors with gender-signaling Western names. By contrast, women whose names lose gender cues in English transliteration, predominantly those with East Asian names, receive fewer citations in these same papers. Two preregistered experiments (N = 2,250) corroborate this pattern and identify its mechanism: linguistic legibility, not cultural unfamiliarity, determines who is recognized as a woman and who benefits from policies designed to support women in science. Overall, these findings expose a previously unrecognized layer of inequity embedded in global equity infrastructures. As science becomes increasingly global and equity efforts increasingly algorithmic, the legibility gap reveals how uneven identity recognition reshapes fairness. In global systems of recognition, equity depends not only on whether policies are effective on average, but also on whether they are equitable across cultures.

Related papers

• GKnow: Measuring the Entanglement of Gender Bias and Factual Gender [47.39675194552945]
  gknow is a benchmark to assess gender knowledge and gender bias in language models across different types of gender-related predictions.<n>We test the impact of neuron ablation on benchmarks for disentangling stereotypical and factual gender.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T15:52:30Z)
• Relating Word Embedding Gender Biases to Gender Gaps: A Cross-Cultural Analysis [6.057865461877989]
  This paper presents an approach for quantifying gender bias in word embeddings.<n>We then use these metrics to characterize statistical gender gaps in education, politics, economics, and health.<n>We validate these metrics on 2018 Twitter data spanning 51 U.S. regions and 99 countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T22:18:36Z)
• Gender Inequality in English Textbooks Around the World: an NLP Approach [0.0]
  This study applies natural language processing methods to quantify gender inequality in English textbooks from 22 countries across 7 cultural spheres.<n> Metrics include character count, firstness (which gender is mentioned first), and TF-IDF word associations by gender.<n>Results show consistent overrepresentation of male characters in terms of count, firstness, and named entities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T04:16:09Z)
• Identifying Gender Stereotypes and Biases in Automated Translation from English to Italian using Similarity Networks [0.25049267048783647]
  This paper is a collaborative effort between Linguistics, Law, and Computer Science to evaluate stereotypes and biases in automated translation systems.<n>We advocate gender-neutral translation as a means to promote gender inclusion and improve the objectivity of machine translation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T09:55:32Z)
• GenderCARE: A Comprehensive Framework for Assessing and Reducing Gender Bias in Large Language Models [73.23743278545321]
  Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable capabilities in natural language generation, but have also been observed to magnify societal biases.<n>GenderCARE is a comprehensive framework that encompasses innovative Criteria, bias Assessment, Reduction techniques, and Evaluation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T15:35:46Z)
• Beyond Binary Gender: Evaluating Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Ambiguous Attitude Words [85.48043537327258]
  Existing machine translation gender bias evaluations are primarily focused on male and female genders. This study presents a benchmark AmbGIMT (Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Ambiguous attitude words) We propose a novel process to evaluate gender bias based on the Emotional Attitude Score (EAS), which is used to quantify ambiguous attitude words.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T08:13:51Z)
• Leveraging Large Language Models to Measure Gender Representation Bias in Gendered Language Corpora [9.959039325564744]
  Large language models (LLMs) often inherit and amplify social biases embedded in their training data.<n>Gender bias is the association of specific roles or traits with a particular gender.<n>Gender representation bias is the unequal frequency of references to individuals of different genders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T16:30:58Z)
• Exploring the Impact of Training Data Distribution and Subword Tokenization on Gender Bias in Machine Translation [19.719314005149883]
  We study the effect of tokenization on gender bias in machine translation. We observe that female and non-stereotypical gender inflections of profession names tend to be split into subword tokens. We show that analyzing subword splits provides good estimates of gender-form imbalance in the training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-21T21:21:55Z)
• "I'm fully who I am": Towards Centering Transgender and Non-Binary Voices to Measure Biases in Open Language Generation [69.25368160338043]
  Transgender and non-binary (TGNB) individuals disproportionately experience discrimination and exclusion from daily life. We assess how the social reality surrounding experienced marginalization of TGNB persons contributes to and persists within Open Language Generation. We introduce TANGO, a dataset of template-based real-world text curated from a TGNB-oriented community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T04:21:45Z)
• Measuring Gender Bias in Word Embeddings of Gendered Languages Requires Disentangling Grammatical Gender Signals [3.0349733976070015]
  We demonstrate that word embeddings learn the association between a noun and its grammatical gender in grammatically gendered languages. We show that disentangling grammatical gender signals from word embeddings may lead to improvement in semantic machine learning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-03T17:11:00Z)
• Towards Understanding Gender-Seniority Compound Bias in Natural Language Generation [64.65911758042914]
  We investigate how seniority impacts the degree of gender bias exhibited in pretrained neural generation models. Our results show that GPT-2 amplifies bias by considering women as junior and men as senior more often than the ground truth in both domains. These results suggest that NLP applications built using GPT-2 may harm women in professional capacities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-19T20:05:02Z)
• Investigating writing style as a contributor to gender gaps in science and technology [0.0]
  We find significant differences in writing style by gender, with women using more involved features in their writing.<n>Papers and patents with more involved features also tend to be cited more by women.<n>Our findings suggest that scientific text is not devoid of personal character, which could contribute to bias in evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-28T22:33:36Z)
• Gender Stereotype Reinforcement: Measuring the Gender Bias Conveyed by Ranking Algorithms [68.85295025020942]
  We propose the Gender Stereotype Reinforcement (GSR) measure, which quantifies the tendency of a Search Engines to support gender stereotypes. GSR is the first specifically tailored measure for Information Retrieval, capable of quantifying representational harms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-02T20:45:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.