How Real are Quantum States in $\psi$-ontic Models?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.01972v1
- Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 11:16:59 GMT
- Title: How Real are Quantum States in $\psi$-ontic Models?
- Authors: Ronnie Hermens
- Abstract summary: A series of relatively recent psi-ontology theorems have been taken to show that, provided one accepts certain assumptions, "quantum states are real"
It is argued that, even if one accepts the framework and assumptions employed by such theorems, such a conclusion is not warranted.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: There is a longstanding debate on the metaphysical relation between quantum
states and the systems they describe. A series of relatively recent
{\psi}-ontology theorems have been taken to show that, provided one accepts
certain assumptions, "quantum states are real". In this paper I investigate the
question of what that claim might be taken to mean in light of these theorems.
It is argued that, even if one accepts the framework and assumptions employed
by such theorems, such a conclusion is not warranted. Specifically, I argue
that when a so-called ontic state is taken to describe the properties of a
system, the relation between this state and some quantum state as established
by {\psi}-ontology theorems, is not of the kind that would warrant counting the
quantum state among these properties in any way.
Related papers
- What is "quantum" about quantum gravity? [0.0]
We argue that if both the equivalence principle and quantum mechanics continue to survive experimental tests, that this favors epistemic'' interpretations of quantum mechanics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-13T21:19:50Z) - Response to "The measurement postulates of quantum mechanics are not redundant" [0.0]
We prove that each of these theories contains pure states which are not rays of the Hilbert space.
We also prove that these alternatives violate the finite-dimensionality of mixed states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-04T15:03:50Z) - The measurement postulates of quantum mechanics are not redundant [0.0]
Masanes, Galley and M"uller argue that the measurement postulates of non-relativistic quantum mechanics follow from the structural postulates.
We refute their conclusion, giving explicit examples of non-quantum measurement and state update rules.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-12T14:30:36Z) - Logic meets Wigner's Friend (and their Friends) [49.1574468325115]
We take a fresh look at Wigner's Friend thought-experiment and some of its more recent variants and extensions.
We discuss various solutions proposed in the literature, focusing on a few questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-04T13:31:56Z) - Connecting classical finite exchangeability to quantum theory [45.76759085727843]
Exchangeability is a fundamental concept in probability theory and statistics.
It allows to model situations where the order of observations does not matter.
It is well known that both theorems do not hold for finitely exchangeable sequences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-06T17:15:19Z) - Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory.
We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z) - Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world.
We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z) - The Time-Evolution of States in Quantum Mechanics [77.34726150561087]
It is argued that the Schr"odinger equation does not yield a correct description of the quantum-mechanical time evolution of states of isolated (open) systems featuring events.
A precise general law for the time evolution of states replacing the Schr"odinger equation is formulated within the so-called ETH-Approach to Quantum Mechanics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-04T16:09:10Z) - A no-go theorem for Quantum theory ontological models [0.0]
We show that Quantum Mechanics does not admit ontological models.
We show, via two thought experiments based on the Wigner's friend scenario, that if the ontic state of physical systems in the lab is the same for Wigner and for his friend, one of the following will be violated.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-09T11:42:00Z) - Operational Resource Theory of Imaginarity [48.7576911714538]
We show that quantum states are easier to create and manipulate if they only have real elements.
As an application, we show that imaginarity plays a crucial role for state discrimination.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-29T14:03:38Z) - Bohr meets Rovelli: a dispositionalist account of the quantum limits of
knowledge [0.0]
I argue that the no-go theorems reflect on a formal level those practical and experimental settings that are needed to come to know the properties of physical systems.
I show that, as a consequence of a relationist and perspectival approach to quantum mechanics, the quantum state of the universe regarded as an isolated system cannot be known in principle.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-13T22:45:09Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.