Fast calculation of Gaussian Process multiple-fold cross-validation residuals and their covariances

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.03108v3
• Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2023 09:19:57 GMT
• Title: Fast calculation of Gaussian Process multiple-fold cross-validation residuals and their covariances
• Authors: David Ginsbourger and Cedric Sch\"arer
• Abstract summary: We generalize fast leave-one-out formulae to multiple-fold cross-validation. We highlight the covariance structure of cross-validation residuals in both Simple and Universal Kriging frameworks. Our results enable fast multiple-fold cross-validation and have direct consequences in model diagnostics.
• Score: 0.6091702876917281
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We generalize fast Gaussian process leave-one-out formulae to multiple-fold cross-validation, highlighting in turn the covariance structure of cross-validation residuals in both Simple and Universal Kriging frameworks. We illustrate how resulting covariances affect model diagnostics. We further establish in the case of noiseless observations that correcting for covariances between residuals in cross-validation-based estimation of the scale parameter leads back to MLE. Also, we highlight in broader settings how differences between pseudo-likelihood and likelihood methods boil down to accounting or not for residual covariances. The proposed fast calculation of cross-validation residuals is implemented and benchmarked against a naive implementation. Numerical experiments highlight the accuracy and substantial speed-ups that our approach enables. However, as supported by a discussion on main drivers of computational costs and by a numerical benchmark, speed-ups steeply decline as the number of folds (say, all sharing the same size) decreases. An application to a contaminant localization test case illustrates that grouping clustered observations in folds may help improving model assessment and parameter fitting compared to Leave-One-Out. Overall, our results enable fast multiple-fold cross-validation, have direct consequences in model diagnostics, and pave the way to future work on hyperparameter fitting and on the promising field of goal-oriented fold design.

Related papers

• Synthetic Tabular Data Validation: A Divergence-Based Approach [8.062368743143388]
  Divergences quantify discrepancies between data distributions. Traditional approaches calculate divergences independently for each feature. We propose a novel approach that uses divergence estimation to overcome the limitations of marginal comparisons.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T15:07:52Z)
• Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors Mitigation [63.180725016463974]
  Cross-modal retrieval relies on well-matched large-scale datasets that are laborious in practice. We introduce a novel noisy correspondence learning framework, namely textbfSelf-textbfReinforcing textbfErrors textbfMitigation (SREM)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-27T09:03:43Z)
• Deep Ensembles Meets Quantile Regression: Uncertainty-aware Imputation for Time Series [49.992908221544624]
  Time series data often exhibit numerous missing values, which is the time series imputation task. Previous deep learning methods have been shown to be effective for time series imputation. We propose a non-generative time series imputation method that produces accurate imputations with inherent uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-03T05:52:30Z)
• Online Estimation with Rolling Validation: Adaptive Nonparametric Estimation with Streaming Data [13.069717985067937]
  We propose a weighted rolling-validation procedure, an online variant of leave-one-out cross-validation. Similar to batch cross-validation, it can boost base estimators to achieve a better, adaptive convergence rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T17:52:57Z)
• Bootstrapping the Cross-Validation Estimate [3.5159221757909656]
  Cross-validation is a widely used technique for evaluating the performance of prediction models. It is essential to accurately quantify the uncertainty associated with the estimate. This paper proposes a fast bootstrap method that quickly estimates the standard error of the cross-validation estimate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-01T07:50:54Z)
• A Targeted Accuracy Diagnostic for Variational Approximations [8.969208467611896]
  Variational Inference (VI) is an attractive alternative to Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) Existing methods characterize the quality of the whole variational distribution. We propose the TArgeted Diagnostic for Distribution Approximation Accuracy (TADDAA)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-24T02:50:18Z)
• Distributionally Robust Models with Parametric Likelihood Ratios [123.05074253513935]
  Three simple ideas allow us to train models with DRO using a broader class of parametric likelihood ratios. We find that models trained with the resulting parametric adversaries are consistently more robust to subpopulation shifts when compared to other DRO approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-13T12:43:12Z)
• Efficient CDF Approximations for Normalizing Flows [64.60846767084877]
  We build upon the diffeomorphic properties of normalizing flows to estimate the cumulative distribution function (CDF) over a closed region. Our experiments on popular flow architectures and UCI datasets show a marked improvement in sample efficiency as compared to traditional estimators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-23T06:11:49Z)
• Scalable Cross Validation Losses for Gaussian Process Models [22.204619587725208]
  We use Polya-Gamma auxiliary variables and variational inference to accommodate binary and multi-class classification. We find that our method offers fast training and excellent predictive performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-24T21:01:47Z)
• Deconfounding Scores: Feature Representations for Causal Effect Estimation with Weak Overlap [140.98628848491146]
  We introduce deconfounding scores, which induce better overlap without biasing the target of estimation. We show that deconfounding scores satisfy a zero-covariance condition that is identifiable in observed data. In particular, we show that this technique could be an attractive alternative to standard regularizations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-12T18:50:11Z)
• Machine learning for causal inference: on the use of cross-fit estimators [77.34726150561087]
  Doubly-robust cross-fit estimators have been proposed to yield better statistical properties. We conducted a simulation study to assess the performance of several estimators for the average causal effect (ACE) When used with machine learning, the doubly-robust cross-fit estimators substantially outperformed all of the other estimators in terms of bias, variance, and confidence interval coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T23:09:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.