Objective quantum fields, retrocausality and ontology

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.11524v1
• Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 00:21:33 GMT
• Title: Objective quantum fields, retrocausality and ontology
• Authors: Peter D Drummond and Margaret D Reid
• Abstract summary: We discuss an interpretation of quantum mechanics that we call objective quantum field theory (OQFT) The ideas and analyses of Einstein and Bohr through to more recent approaches to objective realism are discussed.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We compare different approaches to quantum ontology. In particular, we discuss an interpretation of quantum mechanics that we call objective quantum field theory (OQFT), which involves retrocausal fields. Here, objective implies the existence of fields independent of an observer, but not that the results of conjugate measurements are predetermined: the theory is contextual. The ideas and analyses of Einstein and Bohr through to more recent approaches to objective realism are discussed. We briefly describe measurement induced projections, the guided wave interpretation, many-universes, consistent histories, and modal theories. These earlier interpretations are compared with OQFT. We argue that this approach is compatible both with Bohr's quantum complementarity, and Einstein's objective realism.

Related papers

• A Theory of Quantum Jumps [44.99833362998488]
  We study fluorescence and the phenomenon of quantum jumps'' in idealized models of atoms coupled to the quantized electromagnetic field. Our results amount to a derivation of the fundamental randomness in the quantum-mechanical description of microscopic systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T11:00:46Z)
• An Indeterminacy-based Ontology for Quantum Theory [0.0]
  I present and defend a new ontology for quantum theories (or sinterpretation'' of quantum theory) called Generative Quantum Interpretation (GQT) GQT provides a series of important benefits that current widely discussed lack, namely, wave function realism and primitive primitive, without some of their costs. I will argue that GQT should be taken seriously because it provides a series of important benefits that current widely discussed lack, namely, wave function realism and primitive primitive, without some of their costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T17:55:58Z)
• Quantumness and quantum to classical transition in the generalized Rabi model [17.03191662568079]
  We define the quantumness of a Hamiltonian by the free energy difference between its quantum and classical descriptions. We show that the Jaynes-Cummings and anti Jaynes-Cummings models exhibit greater quantumness than the Rabi model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-12T18:24:36Z)
• Unraveling the Mystery of Quantum Measurement with A New Space-Time Approach to Relativistic Quantum Mechanics [9.116661570248171]
  Quantum measurement is a fundamental concept in the field of quantum mechanics. Despite its significance, four fundamental issues continue to pose significant challenges to the broader application of quantum measurement. We employ a new space-time approach to relativistic quantum mechanics to address these issues systematically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T13:25:08Z)
• A new interpretation of quantum theory, based on a bundle-theoretic view of objective idealism [0.0]
  The 'weirdness' of quantum theory can be understood to derive from a vanishing distinguishability of indiscernible particles. The claim is made that quantum theory can be interpreted in an intelligible way by positing a bundle-theoretic view of objective idealism instead of materialism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-22T12:15:04Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Preferred basis, decoherence and a quantum state of the Universe [77.34726150561087]
  We review a number of issues in foundations of quantum theory and quantum cosmology. These issues can be considered as a part of the scientific legacy of H.D. Zeh.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-28T18:07:59Z)
• Quantum resource covariance [0.0]
  Since the dawn of quantum mechanics there is no consensus on what the theory is all about. We construct a theoretical framework within which a given combination of quantum resources is shown to be a Galilean invariant. We show that the notion of physical reality implied by quantum mechanics is not absolute.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-19T17:34:11Z)
• Quantum decoherence by Coulomb interaction [58.720142291102135]
  We present an experimental study of the Coulomb-induced decoherence of free electrons in a superposition state in a biprism electron interferometer close to a semiconducting and metallic surface. The results will enable the determination and minimization of specific decoherence channels in the design of novel quantum instruments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-17T04:11:44Z)
• Bohr meets Rovelli: a dispositionalist account of the quantum limits of knowledge [0.0]
  I argue that the no-go theorems reflect on a formal level those practical and experimental settings that are needed to come to know the properties of physical systems. I show that, as a consequence of a relationist and perspectival approach to quantum mechanics, the quantum state of the universe regarded as an isolated system cannot be known in principle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-13T22:45:09Z)
• The (Quantum) Measurement Problem in Classical Mechanics [0.0]
  We show why this is not an "obvious" nor "self evident" problem for the theory of quanta. We discuss a representational realist account of both physical 'theories' and'measurement' We show how through these same set of presuppositions it is easy to derive a completely analogous paradox for the case of classical mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-01T17:07:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.