Probabilistic Variational Causal Approach in Observational Studies

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.06269v4
• Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 19:50:46 GMT
• Title: Probabilistic Variational Causal Approach in Observational Studies
• Authors: Usef Faghihi, Amir Saki,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a new causal methodology that accounts for the rarity and frequency of events in observational studies based on their relevance to the underlying problem. We propose a direct causal effect metric called the Probabilistic Variational Causal Effect (PACE) and its variations adhering to certain postulates applicable to both non-binary and binary treatments.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: In this paper, we introduce a new causal methodology that accounts for the rarity and frequency of events in observational studies based on their relevance to the underlying problem. Specifically, we propose a direct causal effect metric called the Probabilistic Variational Causal Effect (PACE) and its variations adhering to certain postulates applicable to both non-binary and binary treatments. The PACE metric is derived by integrating the concept of total variation -- representing the purely causal component -- with interventions on the treatment value, combined with the probabilities of hypothetical transitioning between treatment levels. PACE features a parameter d, where lower values of d correspond to scenarios emphasizing rare treatment values, while higher values of d focus on situations where the causal impact of more frequent treatment levels is more relevant. Thus, instead of a single causal effect value, we provide a causal effect function of the degree d. Additionally, we introduce positive and negative PACE to measure the respective positive and negative causal changes in the outcome as exposure values shift. We also consider normalized versions of PACE, referred to as MEAN PACE. Furthermore, we provide an identifiability criterion for PACE to handle counterfactual challenges in observational studies, and we define several generalizations of our methodology. Lastly, we compare our framework with other well-known causal frameworks through the analysis of various examples.

Related papers

• A Bayesian Classification Trees Approach to Treatment Effect Variation with Noncompliance [0.5356944479760104]
  Estimating varying treatment effects in randomized trials with noncompliance is inherently challenging. Existing flexible machine learning methods are highly sensitive to the weak instruments problem. We present a Bayesian Causal Forest model for binary response variables in scenarios with noncompliance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T18:33:55Z)
• Identification of Average Causal Effects in Confounded Additive Noise Models [7.064432289838905]
  We introduce a novel approach for estimating the average causal effects (ACEs) of any subset of the treatment variables on the outcome. We also propose a randomized algorithm that further reduces the number of required interventions to poly-logarithmic in the number of nodes. This establishes that a poly-logarithmic number of interventions is sufficient to infer the causal effects of any subset of treatments on the outcome in confounded ANMs with high probability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-13T21:46:57Z)
• Causal Machine Learning for Moderation Effects [0.0]
  We propose a new parameter, the balanced group average treatment effect (BGATE) By taking the difference of two BGATEs, we can analyse heterogeneity more meaningfully than by comparing two GATEs. Adding additional identifying assumptions allows specific balanced differences in treatment effects between groups to be interpreted causally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T11:34:59Z)
• A Neural Framework for Generalized Causal Sensitivity Analysis [78.71545648682705]
  We propose NeuralCSA, a neural framework for causal sensitivity analysis. We provide theoretical guarantees that NeuralCSA is able to infer valid bounds on the causal query of interest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-27T17:40:02Z)
• Causal Inference from Text: Unveiling Interactions between Variables [20.677407402398405]
  Existing methods only account for confounding covariables that affect both treatment and outcome. This bias arises from insufficient consideration of non-confounding covariables. In this work, we aim to mitigate the bias by unveiling interactions between different variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T11:29:44Z)
• Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions [63.1354734978244]
  We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables. Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z)
• SurvITE: Learning Heterogeneous Treatment Effects from Time-to-Event Data [83.50281440043241]
  We study the problem of inferring heterogeneous treatment effects from time-to-event data. We propose a novel deep learning method for treatment-specific hazard estimation based on balancing representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-26T20:13:17Z)
• Efficient Causal Inference from Combined Observational and Interventional Data through Causal Reductions [68.6505592770171]
  Unobserved confounding is one of the main challenges when estimating causal effects. We propose a novel causal reduction method that replaces an arbitrary number of possibly high-dimensional latent confounders. We propose a learning algorithm to estimate the parameterized reduced model jointly from observational and interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-08T14:29:07Z)
• Causal Mediation Analysis with Hidden Confounders [24.246450472404614]
  Causal mediation analysis (CMA) is a formal statistical approach for identifying and estimating causal effects. This work aims to circumvent the stringent assumption by following a causal graph with a unified confounder and its proxy variables. Our core contribution is an algorithm that combines deep latent-variable models and proxy strategy to jointly infer a unified surrogate confounder and estimate different causal effects in CMA from observed variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-21T06:46:11Z)
• A standardized framework for risk-based assessment of treatment effect heterogeneity in observational healthcare databases [60.07352590494571]
  The aim of this study was to extend this approach to the observational setting using a standardized scalable framework. We demonstrate our framework by evaluating the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors versus beta blockers on three efficacy and six safety outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-13T14:48:31Z)
• Enabling Counterfactual Survival Analysis with Balanced Representations [64.17342727357618]
  Survival data are frequently encountered across diverse medical applications, i.e., drug development, risk profiling, and clinical trials. We propose a theoretically grounded unified framework for counterfactual inference applicable to survival outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T01:15:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.