Analysis and Evaluation of Explainable Artificial Intelligence on
Suicide Risk Assessment
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.06052v1
- Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 05:11:46 GMT
- Title: Analysis and Evaluation of Explainable Artificial Intelligence on
Suicide Risk Assessment
- Authors: Hao Tang, Aref Miri Rekavandi, Dharjinder Rooprai, Girish Dwivedi,
Frank Sanfilippo, Farid Boussaid, Mohammed Bennamoun
- Abstract summary: This study investigates the effectiveness of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques in predicting suicide risks.
Data augmentation techniques and ML models are utilized to predict the associated risk.
Patients with good incomes, respected occupations, and university education have the least risk.
- Score: 32.04382293817763
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: This study investigates the effectiveness of Explainable Artificial
Intelligence (XAI) techniques in predicting suicide risks and identifying the
dominant causes for such behaviours. Data augmentation techniques and ML models
are utilized to predict the associated risk. Furthermore, SHapley Additive
exPlanations (SHAP) and correlation analysis are used to rank the importance of
variables in predictions. Experimental results indicate that Decision Tree
(DT), Random Forest (RF) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models achieve
the best results while DT has the best performance with an accuracy of 95:23%
and an Area Under Curve (AUC) of 0.95. As per SHAP results, anger problems,
depression, and social isolation are the leading variables in predicting the
risk of suicide, and patients with good incomes, respected occupations, and
university education have the least risk. Results demonstrate the effectiveness
of machine learning and XAI framework for suicide risk prediction, and they can
assist psychiatrists in understanding complex human behaviours and can also
assist in reliable clinical decision-making.
Related papers
- HACSurv: A Hierarchical Copula-based Approach for Survival Analysis with Dependent Competing Risks [51.95824566163554]
HACSurv is a survival analysis method that learns structures and cause-specific survival functions from data with competing risks.
By capturing the dependencies between risks and censoring, HACSurv achieves better survival predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-19T18:52:18Z) - Optimizing Mortality Prediction for ICU Heart Failure Patients: Leveraging XGBoost and Advanced Machine Learning with the MIMIC-III Database [1.5186937600119894]
Heart failure affects millions of people worldwide, significantly reducing quality of life and leading to high mortality rates.
Despite extensive research, the relationship between heart failure and mortality rates among ICU patients is not fully understood.
This study analyzed data from 1,177 patients over 18 years old from the MIMIC-III database, identified using ICD-9 codes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-03T07:57:08Z) - Enhanced Prediction of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury Using Advanced Machine Learning Techniques [0.0]
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients poses a significant mortality risk.
Timely detection and prognostication of VAP in TBI patients are crucial to improve patient outcomes and alleviate the strain on healthcare resources.
We implemented six machine learning models using the MIMIC-III database.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-02T09:44:18Z) - Interpretable Survival Analysis for Heart Failure Risk Prediction [50.64739292687567]
We propose a novel survival analysis pipeline that is both interpretable and competitive with state-of-the-art survival models.
Our pipeline achieves state-of-the-art performance and provides interesting and novel insights about risk factors for heart failure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T02:56:05Z) - MedDiffusion: Boosting Health Risk Prediction via Diffusion-based Data
Augmentation [58.93221876843639]
This paper introduces a novel, end-to-end diffusion-based risk prediction model, named MedDiffusion.
It enhances risk prediction performance by creating synthetic patient data during training to enlarge sample space.
It discerns hidden relationships between patient visits using a step-wise attention mechanism, enabling the model to automatically retain the most vital information for generating high-quality data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-04T01:36:30Z) - Explainable AI for Malnutrition Risk Prediction from m-Health and
Clinical Data [3.093890460224435]
This paper presents a novel AI framework for early and explainable malnutrition risk detection based on heterogeneous m-health data.
We performed an extensive model evaluation including both subject-independent and personalised predictions.
We also investigated several benchmark XAI methods to extract global model explanations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-31T08:07:35Z) - A New Approach for Interpretability and Reliability in Clinical Risk
Prediction: Acute Coronary Syndrome Scenario [0.33927193323747895]
We intend to create a new risk assessment methodology that combines the best characteristics of both risk score and machine learning models.
The proposed approach achieved testing results identical to the standard LR, but offers superior interpretability and personalization.
The reliability estimation of individual predictions presented a great correlation with the misclassifications rate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-15T19:33:46Z) - Bootstrapping Your Own Positive Sample: Contrastive Learning With
Electronic Health Record Data [62.29031007761901]
This paper proposes a novel contrastive regularized clinical classification model.
We introduce two unique positive sampling strategies specifically tailored for EHR data.
Our framework yields highly competitive experimental results in predicting the mortality risk on real-world COVID-19 EHR data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-07T06:02:04Z) - Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised
Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks.
Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets.
We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z) - UNITE: Uncertainty-based Health Risk Prediction Leveraging Multi-sourced
Data [81.00385374948125]
We present UNcertaInTy-based hEalth risk prediction (UNITE) model.
UNITE provides accurate disease risk prediction and uncertainty estimation leveraging multi-sourced health data.
We evaluate UNITE on real-world disease risk prediction tasks: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NASH) and Alzheimer's disease (AD)
UNITE achieves up to 0.841 in F1 score for AD detection, up to 0.609 in PR-AUC for NASH detection, and outperforms various state-of-the-art baselines by up to $19%$ over the best baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-22T02:28:11Z) - Gradient Boosting on Decision Trees for Mortality Prediction in
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation [5.050648346154715]
Current prognostic risk scores in cardiac surgery are based on statistics and do not yet benefit from machine learning.
This research aims to create a machine learning model to predict one-year mortality of a patient after TAVI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-08T10:04:42Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.