Application of targeted maximum likelihood estimation in public health
and epidemiological studies: a systematic review
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.07329v1
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 17:50:03 GMT
- Title: Application of targeted maximum likelihood estimation in public health
and epidemiological studies: a systematic review
- Authors: Matthew J. Smith, Rachael V. Phillips, Miguel Angel Luque-Fernandez,
Camille Maringe
- Abstract summary: The Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation framework integrates machine learning, statistical theory, and statistical inference.
We conduct a systematic literature review in PubMed for articles that applied any form of TMLE in observational studies.
Of the 81 publications included, 25% originated from the University of California at Berkeley, where the framework was first developed.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation (TMLE) statistical data analysis
framework integrates machine learning, statistical theory, and statistical
inference to provide a least biased, efficient and robust strategy for
estimation and inference of a variety of statistical and causal parameters. We
describe and evaluate the epidemiological applications that have benefited from
recent methodological developments. We conducted a systematic literature review
in PubMed for articles that applied any form of TMLE in observational studies.
We summarised the epidemiological discipline, geographical location, expertise
of the authors, and TMLE methods over time. We used the Roadmap of Targeted
Learning and Causal Inference to extract key methodological aspects of the
publications. We showcase the contributions to the literature of these TMLE
results. Of the 81 publications included, 25% originated from the University of
California at Berkeley, where the framework was first developed by Professor
Mark van der Laan. By the first half of 2022, 70% of the publications
originated from outside the United States and explored up to 7 different
epidemiological disciplines in 2021-22. Double-robustness, bias reduction and
model misspecification were the main motivations that drew researchers towards
the TMLE framework. Through time, a wide variety of methodological, tutorial
and software-specific articles were cited, owing to the constant growth of
methodological developments around TMLE. There is a clear dissemination trend
of the TMLE framework to various epidemiological disciplines and to increasing
numbers of geographical areas. The availability of R packages, publication of
tutorial papers, and involvement of methodological experts in applied
publications have contributed to an exponential increase in the number of
studies that understood the benefits, and adoption, of TMLE.
Related papers
- A Multilateral Attention-enhanced Deep Neural Network for Disease Outbreak Forecasting: A Case Study on COVID-19 [0.6874745415692134]
We propose a novel approach to address the challenges of infectious disease forecasting.
We introduce a Multilateral Attention-enhanced GRU model that leverages information from multiple sources.
By incorporating attention mechanisms within a GRU framework, our model can effectively capture complex relationships and temporal dependencies in the data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-26T06:31:53Z) - Deep Learning for Pancreas Segmentation: a Systematic Review [0.5714074111744111]
Many deep learning models for pancreas segmentation have been proposed in the past few years.
Pancreas segmentation has been traditionally challenging due to its small size in computed tomography abdominal volumes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-23T09:05:23Z) - A Survey of Models for Cognitive Diagnosis: New Developments and Future Directions [66.40362209055023]
This paper aims to provide a survey of current models for cognitive diagnosis, with more attention on new developments using machine learning-based methods.
By comparing the model structures, parameter estimation algorithms, model evaluation methods and applications, we provide a relatively comprehensive review of the recent trends in cognitive diagnosis models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-07T18:02:00Z) - SciRIFF: A Resource to Enhance Language Model Instruction-Following over Scientific Literature [80.49349719239584]
We present SciRIFF (Scientific Resource for Instruction-Following and Finetuning), a dataset of 137K instruction-following demonstrations for 54 tasks.
SciRIFF is the first dataset focused on extracting and synthesizing information from research literature across a wide range of scientific fields.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-10T21:22:08Z) - Seeing Unseen: Discover Novel Biomedical Concepts via
Geometry-Constrained Probabilistic Modeling [53.7117640028211]
We present a geometry-constrained probabilistic modeling treatment to resolve the identified issues.
We incorporate a suite of critical geometric properties to impose proper constraints on the layout of constructed embedding space.
A spectral graph-theoretic method is devised to estimate the number of potential novel classes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-02T00:56:05Z) - Discovering Mental Health Research Topics with Topic Modeling [13.651763262606782]
This study aims to identify general trends in the field and pinpoint high-impact research topics by analyzing a large dataset of mental health research papers.
Our dataset comprises 96,676 research papers pertaining to mental health, enabling us to examine the relationships between different topics using their abstracts.
To enhance our analysis, we also generated word clouds to provide a comprehensive overview of the machine learning models applied in mental health research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-25T05:25:05Z) - Data-Centric Epidemic Forecasting: A Survey [56.99209141838794]
This survey delves into various data-driven methodological and practical advancements.
We enumerate the large number of epidemiological datasets and novel data streams that are relevant to epidemic forecasting.
We also discuss experiences and challenges that arise in real-world deployment of these forecasting systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-19T16:15:11Z) - Deep forecasting of translational impact in medical research [1.8130872753848115]
We develop a suite of representational and discriminative mathematical models of multi-scale publication data.
We show that citations are only moderately predictive of translational impact as judged by inclusion in patents, guidelines, or policy documents.
We argue that content-based models of impact are superior in performance to conventional, citation-based measures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-17T19:29:41Z) - STELAR: Spatio-temporal Tensor Factorization with Latent Epidemiological
Regularization [76.57716281104938]
We develop a tensor method to predict the evolution of epidemic trends for many regions simultaneously.
STELAR enables long-term prediction by incorporating latent temporal regularization through a system of discrete-time difference equations.
We conduct experiments using both county- and state-level COVID-19 data and show that our model can identify interesting latent patterns of the epidemic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-08T21:21:47Z) - An efficient representation of chronological events in medical texts [9.118144540451514]
We proposed a systematic methodology for learning from chronological events available in clinical notes.
The proposed methodological it path signature framework creates a non-parametric hierarchical representation of sequential events of any type.
The methodology was developed and externally validated using the largest in the UK secondary care mental health EHR data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-16T14:54:29Z) - A Survey on Causal Inference [64.45536158710014]
Causal inference is a critical research topic across many domains, such as statistics, computer science, education, public policy and economics.
Various causal effect estimation methods for observational data have sprung up.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-05T21:35:29Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.