Development and Assessment of Autonomous Vehicles in Both Fully
Automated and Mixed Traffic Conditions
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.04805v1
- Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 02:40:11 GMT
- Title: Development and Assessment of Autonomous Vehicles in Both Fully
Automated and Mixed Traffic Conditions
- Authors: Ahmed Abdelrahman
- Abstract summary: The paper presents a multi-stage approach, starting with the development of a single AV and progressing to connected AVs.
A survey is conducted to validate the driving performance of the AV and will be utilized for a mixed traffic case study.
Results show that using deep reinforcement learning, the AV acquired driving behavior that reached human driving performance.
The adoption of sharing and caring based V2V communication within AV networks enhances their driving behavior, aids in more effective action planning, and promotes collaborative behavior amongst the AVs.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Autonomous Vehicle (AV) technology is advancing rapidly, promising a
significant shift in road transportation safety and potentially resolving
various complex transportation issues. With the increasing deployment of AVs by
various companies, questions emerge about how AVs interact with each other and
with human drivers, especially when AVs are prevalent on the roads. Ensuring
cooperative interaction between AVs and between AVs and human drivers is
critical, though there are concerns about possible negative competitive
behaviors. This paper presents a multi-stage approach, starting with the
development of a single AV and progressing to connected AVs, incorporating
sharing and caring V2V communication strategy to enhance mutual coordination. A
survey is conducted to validate the driving performance of the AV and will be
utilized for a mixed traffic case study, which focuses on how the human drivers
will react to the AV driving alongside them on the same road. Results show that
using deep reinforcement learning, the AV acquired driving behavior that
reached human driving performance. The adoption of sharing and caring based V2V
communication within AV networks enhances their driving behavior, aids in more
effective action planning, and promotes collaborative behavior amongst the AVs.
The survey shows that safety in mixed traffic cannot be guaranteed, as we
cannot control human ego-driven actions if they decide to compete with AV.
Consequently, this paper advocates for enhanced research into the safe
incorporation of AVs on public roads.
Related papers
- Autonomous Decision Making for UAV Cooperative Pursuit-Evasion Game with Reinforcement Learning [50.33447711072726]
This paper proposes a deep reinforcement learning-based model for decision-making in multi-role UAV cooperative pursuit-evasion game.
The proposed method enables autonomous decision-making of the UAVs in pursuit-evasion game scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-05T10:45:30Z) - Characterizing Behavioral Differences and Adaptations of Automated Vehicles and Human Drivers at Unsignalized Intersections: Insights from Waymo and Lyft Open Datasets [9.080817016043769]
The integration of autonomous vehicles (AVs) into transportation systems presents an unprecedented opportunity to enhance road safety and efficiency.
This study aims to bridge the gap by examining behavioral differences and adaptations of AVs and human-driven vehicles (HVs) at unsignalized intersections.
Using a systematic methodology, the research identifies and analyzes merging and crossing conflicts by calculating key safety and efficiency metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-16T13:19:32Z) - Generative Diffusion-based Contract Design for Efficient AI Twins Migration in Vehicular Embodied AI Networks [55.15079732226397]
Embodied AI is a rapidly advancing field that bridges the gap between cyberspace and physical space.
In VEANET, embodied AI twins act as in-vehicle AI assistants to perform diverse tasks supporting autonomous driving.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-02T02:20:42Z) - Work-in-Progress: Crash Course: Can (Under Attack) Autonomous Driving Beat Human Drivers? [60.51287814584477]
This paper evaluates the inherent risks in autonomous driving by examining the current landscape of AVs.
We develop specific claims highlighting the delicate balance between the advantages of AVs and potential security challenges in real-world scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-14T09:42:21Z) - Comprehensive Autonomous Vehicle Optimal Routing With Dynamic Heuristics [0.0]
The proposed model to improve AV user experience, uses a hybrid AV Network of multiple connected autonomous vehicles.
The true optimal solution for this problem is to devise an automated guidance system for vehicles in an AV network.
The results are analysed and compared to evaluate the effectiveness of the solution and identify gaps and future enhancements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-17T18:21:56Z) - Stackelberg Driver Model for Continual Policy Improvement in
Scenario-Based Closed-Loop Autonomous Driving [5.765939495779461]
adversarial generation methods have emerged as a class of efficient approaches to synthesize safety-critical scenarios.
We tailor the Stackelberg Driver Model (SDM) to accurately characterize the hierarchical nature of vehicle interaction dynamics.
Our algorithm exhibits superior performance compared to several baselines especially in higher dimensional scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-25T15:47:07Z) - A Counterfactual Safety Margin Perspective on the Scoring of Autonomous
Vehicles' Riskiness [52.27309191283943]
This paper presents a data-driven framework for assessing the risk of different AVs' behaviors.
We propose the notion of counterfactual safety margin, which represents the minimum deviation from nominal behavior that could cause a collision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-02T09:48:08Z) - Learning energy-efficient driving behaviors by imitating experts [75.12960180185105]
This paper examines the role of imitation learning in bridging the gap between control strategies and realistic limitations in communication and sensing.
We show that imitation learning can succeed in deriving policies that, if adopted by 5% of vehicles, may boost the energy-efficiency of networks with varying traffic conditions by 15% using only local observations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-28T17:08:31Z) - A Cooperation-Aware Lane Change Method for Autonomous Vehicles [16.937363492078426]
This paper presents a cooperation-aware lane change method utilizing interactions between vehicles.
We first propose an interactive trajectory prediction method to explore possible cooperations between an AV and the others.
We then propose a motion planning algorithm based on model predictive control (MPC), which incorporates AV's decision and surrounding vehicles' interactive behaviors into constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-26T04:45:45Z) - Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning for Cooperative Lane Changing of
Connected and Autonomous Vehicles in Mixed Traffic [16.858651125916133]
Lane-changing is a great challenge for autonomous vehicles (AVs) in mixed and dynamic traffic scenarios.
In this paper, we formulate the lane-changing decision making of multiple AVs in a mixed-traffic highway environment as a multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) problem.
Our proposed MARL framework consistently outperforms several state-of-the-art benchmarks in terms of efficiency, safety and driver comfort.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-11T17:17:24Z) - Transferable Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework for Autonomous
Vehicles with Joint Radar-Data Communications [69.24726496448713]
We propose an intelligent optimization framework based on the Markov Decision Process (MDP) to help the AV make optimal decisions.
We then develop an effective learning algorithm leveraging recent advances of deep reinforcement learning techniques to find the optimal policy for the AV.
We show that the proposed transferable deep reinforcement learning framework reduces the obstacle miss detection probability by the AV up to 67% compared to other conventional deep reinforcement learning approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-28T08:45:37Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.