Bayesian Networks for Causal Analysis in Socioecological Systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.10101v2
- Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 10:06:43 GMT
- Title: Bayesian Networks for Causal Analysis in Socioecological Systems
- Authors: Rafael Cabañas, Ana D. Maldonado, María Morales, Pedro A. Aguilera, Antonio Salmerón,
- Abstract summary: Causal and counterfactual reasoning are emerging directions in data science.<n>Main contribution of this paper is to analyze the relations of necessity and sufficiency between the variables of a socioecological system.<n>In particular, we consider a case study involving socioeconomic factors and land-uses in southern Spain.
- Score: 0.3495246564946556
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Causal and counterfactual reasoning are emerging directions in data science that allow us to reason about hypothetical scenarios. This is particularly useful in fields like environmental and ecological sciences, where interventional data are usually not available. Structural causal models are probabilistic models for causal analysis that simplify this kind of reasoning due to their graphical representation. They can be regarded as extensions of the so-called Bayesian networks, a well known modeling tool commonly used in environmental and ecological problems. The main contribution of this paper is to analyze the relations of necessity and sufficiency between the variables of a socioecological system using counterfactual reasoning with Bayesian networks. In particular, we consider a case study involving socioeconomic factors and land-uses in southern Spain. In addition, this paper aims to be a coherent overview of the fundamental concepts for applying counterfactual reasoning, so that environmental researchers with a background in Bayesian networks can easily take advantage of the structural causal model formalism.
Related papers
- Estimating Causal Effects from Learned Causal Networks [56.14597641617531]
We propose an alternative paradigm for answering causal-effect queries over discrete observable variables.
We learn the causal Bayesian network and its confounding latent variables directly from the observational data.
We show that this emphmodel completion learning approach can be more effective than estimand approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-26T08:39:09Z) - Distributional Associations vs In-Context Reasoning: A Study of Feed-forward and Attention Layers [49.80959223722325]
We study the distinction between feed-forward and attention layers in large language models.
We find that feed-forward layers tend to learn simple distributional associations such as bigrams, while attention layers focus on in-context reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-05T08:51:08Z) - Learning Discrete Concepts in Latent Hierarchical Models [73.01229236386148]
Learning concepts from natural high-dimensional data holds potential in building human-aligned and interpretable machine learning models.
We formalize concepts as discrete latent causal variables that are related via a hierarchical causal model.
We substantiate our theoretical claims with synthetic data experiments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-01T18:01:03Z) - Intervention and Conditioning in Causal Bayesian Networks [23.225006087292765]
We show that by making simple yet often realistic independence assumptions, it is possible to estimate the probability of an interventional formula.
In many cases of interest, when the assumptions are appropriate, these probability estimates can be evaluated using observational data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-23T15:55:38Z) - Identifiable Latent Neural Causal Models [82.14087963690561]
Causal representation learning seeks to uncover latent, high-level causal representations from low-level observed data.
We determine the types of distribution shifts that do contribute to the identifiability of causal representations.
We translate our findings into a practical algorithm, allowing for the acquisition of reliable latent causal representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-23T04:13:55Z) - Counterfactual Explanations of Black-box Machine Learning Models using Causal Discovery with Applications to Credit Rating [4.200230734911261]
Several XAI models consider causal relationships to explain models by examining the input-output relationships of prediction models and the dependencies between features.
The majority of these models have been based their explanations on counterfactual probabilities, assuming that the causal graph is known.
This study proposed a novel XAI framework that relaxed the constraint that the causal graph is known.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-05T02:26:24Z) - Towards Bounding Causal Effects under Markov Equivalence [13.050023008348388]
We consider the derivation of bounds on causal effects given only observational data.
We provide a systematic algorithm to derive bounds on causal effects that exploit the invariant properties of the equivalence class.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-13T11:49:55Z) - Identifiable Latent Polynomial Causal Models Through the Lens of Change [82.14087963690561]
Causal representation learning aims to unveil latent high-level causal representations from observed low-level data.
One of its primary tasks is to provide reliable assurance of identifying these latent causal models, known as identifiability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T07:46:10Z) - A Causal Framework for Decomposing Spurious Variations [68.12191782657437]
We develop tools for decomposing spurious variations in Markovian and Semi-Markovian models.
We prove the first results that allow a non-parametric decomposition of spurious effects.
The described approach has several applications, ranging from explainable and fair AI to questions in epidemiology and medicine.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-08T09:40:28Z) - Causal models in string diagrams [0.0]
The framework of causal models provides a principled approach to causal reasoning, applied today across many scientific domains.
We present this framework in the language of string diagrams, interpreted formally using category theory.
We argue and demonstrate that causal reasoning according to the causal model framework is most naturally and intuitively done as diagrammatic reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-15T21:54:48Z) - Hierarchical Graph Neural Networks for Causal Discovery and Root Cause
Localization [52.72490784720227]
REASON consists of Topological Causal Discovery and Individual Causal Discovery.
The Topological Causal Discovery component aims to model the fault propagation in order to trace back to the root causes.
The Individual Causal Discovery component focuses on capturing abrupt change patterns of a single system entity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-03T20:17:45Z) - Typing assumptions improve identification in causal discovery [123.06886784834471]
Causal discovery from observational data is a challenging task to which an exact solution cannot always be identified.
We propose a new set of assumptions that constrain possible causal relationships based on the nature of the variables.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-22T14:23:08Z) - The Causal Neural Connection: Expressiveness, Learnability, and
Inference [125.57815987218756]
An object called structural causal model (SCM) represents a collection of mechanisms and sources of random variation of the system under investigation.
In this paper, we show that the causal hierarchy theorem (Thm. 1, Bareinboim et al., 2020) still holds for neural models.
We introduce a special type of SCM called a neural causal model (NCM), and formalize a new type of inductive bias to encode structural constraints necessary for performing causal inferences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-02T01:55:18Z) - To do or not to do: finding causal relations in smart homes [2.064612766965483]
This paper introduces a new way to learn causal models from a mixture of experiments on the environment and observational data.
The core of our method is the use of selected interventions, especially our learning takes into account the variables where it is impossible to intervene.
We use our method on a smart home simulation, a use case where knowing causal relations pave the way towards explainable systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-20T22:36:04Z) - A Taxonomy of Explainable Bayesian Networks [0.0]
We introduce a taxonomy of explainability in Bayesian networks.
We extend the existing categorisation of explainability in the model, reasoning or evidence to include explanation of decisions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-28T07:29:57Z) - Structural Causal Models Are (Solvable by) Credal Networks [70.45873402967297]
Causal inferences can be obtained by standard algorithms for the updating of credal nets.
This contribution should be regarded as a systematic approach to represent structural causal models by credal networks.
Experiments show that approximate algorithms for credal networks can immediately be used to do causal inference in real-size problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-02T11:19:36Z) - Causal Discovery in Physical Systems from Videos [123.79211190669821]
Causal discovery is at the core of human cognition.
We consider the task of causal discovery from videos in an end-to-end fashion without supervision on the ground-truth graph structure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-01T17:29:57Z) - Bayesian Learning of Causal Relationships for System Reliability [0.0]
We show how some aspects of established causal methodology can be translated via trees.
We show how various domain specific concepts of causality particular to reliability can be imported into more generic causal algebras.
This paper is informed by a detailed analysis of maintenance records associated with a large electrical distribution company.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-14T15:40:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.