Application of Machine Learning Algorithms in Classifying Postoperative Success in Metabolic Bariatric Surgery: A Comprehensive Study
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.20124v1
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 11:27:37 GMT
- Title: Application of Machine Learning Algorithms in Classifying Postoperative Success in Metabolic Bariatric Surgery: A Comprehensive Study
- Authors: José Alberto Benítez-Andrades, Camino Prada-García, Rubén García-Fernández, María D. Ballesteros-Pomar, María-Inmaculada González-Alonso, Antonio Serrano-García,
- Abstract summary: This study presents a novel machine learning approach to classify patients in the context of metabolic bariatric surgery.
Various machine learning models, including GaussianNB, ComplementNB, KNN, Decision Tree, KNN with RandomOverSampler, and KNN with SMOTE, were applied to a dataset of 73 patients.
- Score: 0.32985979395737786
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Objectives: Metabolic Bariatric Surgery (MBS) is a critical intervention for patients living with obesity and related health issues. Accurate classification and prediction of patient outcomes are vital for optimizing treatment strategies. This study presents a novel machine learning approach to classify patients in the context of metabolic bariatric surgery, providing insights into the efficacy of different models and variable types. Methods: Various machine learning models, including GaussianNB, ComplementNB, KNN, Decision Tree, KNN with RandomOverSampler, and KNN with SMOTE, were applied to a dataset of 73 patients. The dataset, comprising psychometric, socioeconomic, and analytical variables, was analyzed to determine the most efficient predictive model. The study also explored the impact of different variable groupings and oversampling techniques. Results: Experimental results indicate average accuracy values as high as 66.7% for the best model. Enhanced versions of KNN and Decision Tree, along with variations of KNN such as RandomOverSampler and SMOTE, yielded the best results. Conclusions: The study unveils a promising avenue for classifying patients in the realm of metabolic bariatric surgery. The results underscore the importance of selecting appropriate variables and employing diverse approaches to achieve optimal performance. The developed system holds potential as a tool to assist healthcare professionals in decision-making, thereby enhancing metabolic bariatric surgery outcomes. These findings lay the groundwork for future collaboration between hospitals and healthcare entities to improve patient care through the utilization of machine learning algorithms. Moreover, the findings suggest room for improvement, potentially achievable with a larger dataset and careful parameter tuning.
Related papers
- Enhanced Prediction of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury Using Advanced Machine Learning Techniques [0.0]
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients poses a significant mortality risk.
Timely detection and prognostication of VAP in TBI patients are crucial to improve patient outcomes and alleviate the strain on healthcare resources.
We implemented six machine learning models using the MIMIC-III database.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-02T09:44:18Z) - Two new feature selection methods based on learn-heuristic techniques for breast cancer prediction: A comprehensive analysis [6.796017024594715]
We suggest two novel feature selection (FS) methods based upon an imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA) and a bat algorithm (BA)
This study aims to enhance diagnostic models' efficiency and present a comprehensive analysis to help clinical physicians make much more precise and reliable decisions than before.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-19T19:07:53Z) - Dataset Optimization for Chronic Disease Prediction with Bio-Inspired
Feature Selection [0.32634122554913997]
The study contributes to the advancement of predictive analytics in the realm of chronic diseases.
The potential impact of this work extends to early intervention, precision medicine, and improved patient outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-17T18:18:34Z) - Prediction of Post-Operative Renal and Pulmonary Complications Using
Transformers [69.81176740997175]
We evaluate the performance of transformer-based models in predicting postoperative acute renal failure, pulmonary complications, and postoperative in-hospital mortality.
Our results demonstrate that transformer-based models can achieve superior performance in predicting postoperative complications and outperform traditional machine learning models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-01T14:08:05Z) - Benchmarking Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Models through the Lens of
Interpretability [82.29775890542967]
Estimating personalized effects of treatments is a complex, yet pervasive problem.
Recent developments in the machine learning literature on heterogeneous treatment effect estimation gave rise to many sophisticated, but opaque, tools.
We use post-hoc feature importance methods to identify features that influence the model's predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-16T17:59:05Z) - Towards Trustworthy Cross-patient Model Development [3.109478324371548]
We study differences in model performance and explainability when trained for all patients and one patient at a time.
The results show that patients' demographics has a large impact on the performance and explainability and thus trustworthiness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-20T10:51:04Z) - On the explainability of hospitalization prediction on a large COVID-19
patient dataset [45.82374977939355]
We develop various AI models to predict hospitalization on a large (over 110$k$) cohort of COVID-19 positive-tested US patients.
Despite high data unbalance, the models reach average precision 0.96-0.98 (0.75-0.85), recall 0.96-0.98 (0.74-0.85), and $F_score 0.97-0.98 (0.79-0.83) on the non-hospitalized (or hospitalized) class.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-28T10:23:38Z) - Bootstrapping Your Own Positive Sample: Contrastive Learning With
Electronic Health Record Data [62.29031007761901]
This paper proposes a novel contrastive regularized clinical classification model.
We introduce two unique positive sampling strategies specifically tailored for EHR data.
Our framework yields highly competitive experimental results in predicting the mortality risk on real-world COVID-19 EHR data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-07T06:02:04Z) - Adversarial Sample Enhanced Domain Adaptation: A Case Study on
Predictive Modeling with Electronic Health Records [57.75125067744978]
We propose a data augmentation method to facilitate domain adaptation.
adversarially generated samples are used during domain adaptation.
Results confirm the effectiveness of our method and the generality on different tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-13T03:20:20Z) - Hemogram Data as a Tool for Decision-making in COVID-19 Management:
Applications to Resource Scarcity Scenarios [62.997667081978825]
COVID-19 pandemics has challenged emergency response systems worldwide, with widespread reports of essential services breakdown and collapse of health care structure.
This work describes a machine learning model derived from hemogram exam data performed in symptomatic patients.
Proposed models can predict COVID-19 qRT-PCR results in symptomatic individuals with high accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-10T01:45:03Z) - Dynamic Predictions of Postoperative Complications from Explainable,
Uncertainty-Aware, and Multi-Task Deep Neural Networks [1.7548541038532495]
Multi-task deep learning models outperform random forest models in predicting postoperative complications.
integrated interpretability mechanisms identified potentially modifiable risk factors for each complication.
Monte Carlo dropout methods provided a quantitative measure of prediction uncertainty that has the potential to enhance clinical trust.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-27T02:32:32Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.