Exploring Concept Depth: How Large Language Models Acquire Knowledge and Concept at Different Layers?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.07066v7
- Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2025 23:34:30 GMT
- Title: Exploring Concept Depth: How Large Language Models Acquire Knowledge and Concept at Different Layers?
- Authors: Mingyu Jin, Qinkai Yu, Jingyuan Huang, Qingcheng Zeng, Zhenting Wang, Wenyue Hua, Haiyan Zhao, Kai Mei, Yanda Meng, Kaize Ding, Fan Yang, Mengnan Du, Yongfeng Zhang,
- Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performances across a wide range of tasks.
However, the mechanisms by which these models encode tasks of varying complexities remain poorly understood.
We introduce the idea of "Concept Depth" to suggest that more complex concepts are typically acquired in deeper layers.
- Score: 57.04803703952721
- License:
- Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performances across a wide range of tasks. However, the mechanisms by which these models encode tasks of varying complexities remain poorly understood. In this paper, we explore the hypothesis that LLMs process concepts of varying complexities in different layers, introducing the idea of "Concept Depth" to suggest that more complex concepts are typically acquired in deeper layers. Specifically, we categorize concepts based on their level of abstraction, defining them in the order of increasing complexity within factual, emotional, and inferential tasks. We conduct extensive probing experiments using layer-wise representations across various LLM families (Gemma, LLaMA, Qwen) on various datasets spanning the three domains of tasks. Our findings reveal that models could efficiently conduct probing for simpler tasks in shallow layers, and more complex tasks typically necessitate deeper layers for accurate understanding. Additionally, we examine how external factors, such as adding noise to the input and quantizing the model weights, might affect layer-wise representations. Our findings suggest that these factors can impede the development of a conceptual understanding of LLMs until deeper layers are explored. We hope that our proposed concept and experimental insights will enhance the understanding of the mechanisms underlying LLMs. Our codes are available at https://github.com/Luckfort/CD.
Related papers
- Analyzing Fine-tuning Representation Shift for Multimodal LLMs Steering alignment [53.90425382758605]
We show how fine-tuning alters the internal structure of a model to specialize in new multimodal tasks.
Our work sheds light on how multimodal representations evolve through fine-tuning and offers a new perspective for interpreting model adaptation in multimodal tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-06T13:37:13Z) - A Survey on Large Language Models with some Insights on their Capabilities and Limitations [0.3222802562733786]
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit remarkable performance across various language-related tasks.
LLMs have demonstrated emergent abilities extending beyond their core functions.
This paper explores the foundational components, scaling mechanisms, and architectural strategies that drive these capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-03T21:04:49Z) - Does Representation Matter? Exploring Intermediate Layers in Large Language Models [22.704926222438456]
We investigate the quality of intermediate representations in large language models (LLMs)
We find that intermediate layers often yield more informative representations for downstream tasks than the final layers.
Our results illuminate the internal mechanics of LLMs and guide strategies for architectural optimization and training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-12T18:48:51Z) - Cognitive LLMs: Towards Integrating Cognitive Architectures and Large Language Models for Manufacturing Decision-making [51.737762570776006]
LLM-ACTR is a novel neuro-symbolic architecture that provides human-aligned and versatile decision-making.
Our framework extracts and embeds knowledge of ACT-R's internal decision-making process as latent neural representations.
Our experiments on novel Design for Manufacturing tasks show both improved task performance as well as improved grounded decision-making capability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-17T11:49:53Z) - Looking into Black Box Code Language Models [2.5324062203985935]
We use two state-of-the-art codeLMs, Codegen-Mono and Ploycoder, and three widely used programming languages, Java, Go, and Python.
We show concepts of interest can be edited within feed-forward layers without compromising codeLM performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-05T21:13:41Z) - Can Large Language Models Understand DL-Lite Ontologies? An Empirical Study [10.051572826948762]
Large models (LLMs) have shown significant achievements in solving a wide range of tasks.
We empirically analyze the LLMs' capability of understanding Description Logic (DL-Lite)
We find that LLMs understand formal syntax and model-theoretic semantics of concepts and roles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-25T13:16:34Z) - Reasoning about concepts with LLMs: Inconsistencies abound [13.042591838719936]
Large language models (LLMs) often display and demonstrate significant inconsistencies in their knowledge.
In particular, we have been able to significantly enhance the performance of LLMs of various sizes with openly available weights.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-30T15:38:54Z) - Cantor: Inspiring Multimodal Chain-of-Thought of MLLM [83.6663322930814]
We argue that converging visual context acquisition and logical reasoning is pivotal for tackling visual reasoning tasks.
We propose an innovative multimodal CoT framework, termed Cantor, characterized by a perception-decision architecture.
Our experiments demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed framework, showing significant improvements in multimodal CoT performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-24T17:59:48Z) - Is Bigger and Deeper Always Better? Probing LLaMA Across Scales and
Layers [73.28459749681879]
This paper focuses on LLaMA, a prominent open-source foundational model in natural language processing.
Instead of assessing LLaMA through its generative output, we design multiple-choice tasks to probe its intrinsic understanding.
We unveil several key and uncommon findings based on the designed probing tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-07T14:50:41Z) - Understanding Masked Autoencoders via Hierarchical Latent Variable
Models [109.35382136147349]
Masked autoencoder (MAE) has recently achieved prominent success in a variety of vision tasks.
Despite the emergence of intriguing empirical observations on MAE, a theoretically principled understanding is still lacking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-08T03:00:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.