Autonomous LLM-driven research from data to human-verifiable research papers
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.17605v1
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 23:15:49 GMT
- Title: Autonomous LLM-driven research from data to human-verifiable research papers
- Authors: Tal Ifargan, Lukas Hafner, Maor Kern, Ori Alcalay, Roy Kishony,
- Abstract summary: We build an automation platform that guides interacting through complete stepwise process.
In mode provided annotated data alone, datapaper raised hypotheses, designed plans, wrote and interpreted analysis codes, generated and interpreted results.
We demonstrate potential for AI-driven acceleration of scientific discovery while enhancing traceability, transparency and verifiability.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: As AI promises to accelerate scientific discovery, it remains unclear whether fully AI-driven research is possible and whether it can adhere to key scientific values, such as transparency, traceability and verifiability. Mimicking human scientific practices, we built data-to-paper, an automation platform that guides interacting LLM agents through a complete stepwise research process, while programmatically back-tracing information flow and allowing human oversight and interactions. In autopilot mode, provided with annotated data alone, data-to-paper raised hypotheses, designed research plans, wrote and debugged analysis codes, generated and interpreted results, and created complete and information-traceable research papers. Even though research novelty was relatively limited, the process demonstrated autonomous generation of de novo quantitative insights from data. For simple research goals, a fully-autonomous cycle can create manuscripts which recapitulate peer-reviewed publications without major errors in about 80-90%, yet as goal complexity increases, human co-piloting becomes critical for assuring accuracy. Beyond the process itself, created manuscripts too are inherently verifiable, as information-tracing allows to programmatically chain results, methods and data. Our work thereby demonstrates a potential for AI-driven acceleration of scientific discovery while enhancing, rather than jeopardizing, traceability, transparency and verifiability.
Related papers
- Data-Centric AI in the Age of Large Language Models [51.20451986068925]
This position paper proposes a data-centric viewpoint of AI research, focusing on large language models (LLMs)
We make the key observation that data is instrumental in the developmental (e.g., pretraining and fine-tuning) and inferential stages (e.g., in-context learning) of LLMs.
We identify four specific scenarios centered around data, covering data-centric benchmarks and data curation, data attribution, knowledge transfer, and inference contextualization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T16:34:07Z) - MatPlotAgent: Method and Evaluation for LLM-Based Agentic Scientific Data Visualization [86.61052121715689]
MatPlotAgent is a model-agnostic framework designed to automate scientific data visualization tasks.
MatPlotBench is a high-quality benchmark consisting of 100 human-verified test cases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-18T04:28:28Z) - Toward a Team of AI-made Scientists for Scientific Discovery from Gene
Expression Data [9.767546641019862]
We introduce a novel framework, a Team of AI-made Scientists (TAIS), designed to streamline the scientific discovery pipeline.
TAIS comprises simulated roles, including a project manager, data engineer, and domain expert, each represented by a Large Language Model (LLM)
These roles collaborate to replicate the tasks typically performed by data scientists, with a specific focus on identifying disease-predictive genes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-15T06:30:12Z) - Artificial intelligence to automate the systematic review of scientific
literature [0.0]
We present a survey of AI techniques proposed in the last 15 years to help researchers conduct systematic analyses of scientific literature.
We describe the tasks currently supported, the types of algorithms applied, and available tools proposed in 34 primary studies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-13T19:12:49Z) - AI and Generative AI for Research Discovery and Summarization [3.8601741392210434]
AI and generative AI tools have burst onto the scene this year, creating incredible opportunities to increase work productivity and improve our lives.
One area that these tools can make a substantial impact is in research discovery and summarization.
We review the developments in AI and generative AI for research discovery and summarization, and propose directions where these types of tools are likely to head in the future.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-08T18:42:55Z) - Generative AI in Writing Research Papers: A New Type of Algorithmic Bias
and Uncertainty in Scholarly Work [0.38850145898707145]
Large language models (LLMs) and generative AI tools present challenges in identifying and addressing biases.
generative AI tools are susceptible to goal misgeneralization, hallucinations, and adversarial attacks such as red teaming prompts.
We find that incorporating generative AI in the process of writing research manuscripts introduces a new type of context-induced algorithmic bias.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-04T04:05:04Z) - On Responsible Machine Learning Datasets with Fairness, Privacy, and
Regulatory Norms [58.93352076927003]
There have been severe concerns over the trustworthiness of AI technologies.
Machine and deep learning algorithms depend heavily on the data used during their development.
We propose a framework to evaluate the datasets through a responsible rubric.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T14:01:53Z) - The Future of Fundamental Science Led by Generative Closed-Loop
Artificial Intelligence [67.70415658080121]
Recent advances in machine learning and AI are disrupting technological innovation, product development, and society as a whole.
AI has contributed less to fundamental science in part because large data sets of high-quality data for scientific practice and model discovery are more difficult to access.
Here we explore and investigate aspects of an AI-driven, automated, closed-loop approach to scientific discovery.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-09T21:16:56Z) - Human-Centric Multimodal Machine Learning: Recent Advances and Testbed
on AI-based Recruitment [66.91538273487379]
There is a certain consensus about the need to develop AI applications with a Human-Centric approach.
Human-Centric Machine Learning needs to be developed based on four main requirements: (i) utility and social good; (ii) privacy and data ownership; (iii) transparency and accountability; and (iv) fairness in AI-driven decision-making processes.
We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-13T16:44:44Z) - Research Trends and Applications of Data Augmentation Algorithms [77.34726150561087]
We identify the main areas of application of data augmentation algorithms, the types of algorithms used, significant research trends, their progression over time and research gaps in data augmentation literature.
We expect readers to understand the potential of data augmentation, as well as identify future research directions and open questions within data augmentation research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-18T11:38:32Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.