Chaos with Keywords: Exposing Large Language Models Sycophantic Hallucination to Misleading Keywords and Evaluating Defense Strategies

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03827v2
• Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 01:38:45 GMT
• Title: Chaos with Keywords: Exposing Large Language Models Sycophantic Hallucination to Misleading Keywords and Evaluating Defense Strategies
• Authors: Aswin RRV, Nemika Tyagi, Md Nayem Uddin, Neeraj Varshney, Chitta Baral,
• Abstract summary: This study explores the sycophantic tendencies of Large Language Models (LLMs) LLMs tend to provide answers that match what users want to hear, even if they are not entirely correct.
• Score: 47.92996085976817
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This study explores the sycophantic tendencies of Large Language Models (LLMs), where these models tend to provide answers that match what users want to hear, even if they are not entirely correct. The motivation behind this exploration stems from the common behavior observed in individuals searching the internet for facts with partial or misleading knowledge. Similar to using web search engines, users may recall fragments of misleading keywords and submit them to an LLM, hoping for a comprehensive response. Our empirical analysis of several LLMs shows the potential danger of these models amplifying misinformation when presented with misleading keywords. Additionally, we thoroughly assess four existing hallucination mitigation strategies to reduce LLMs sycophantic behavior. Our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of these strategies for generating factually correct statements. Furthermore, our analyses delve into knowledge-probing experiments on factual keywords and different categories of sycophancy mitigation.

Related papers

• OnionEval: An Unified Evaluation of Fact-conflicting Hallucination for Small-Large Language Models [6.727694415099734]
  OnionEval is designed to assess the fact-conflicting hallucination tendencies of small LLMs across different contextual levels. Our results reveal a key feature of SLLMs: they excel in factual analysis but face challenges with context reasoning. Further investigation shows that a simple Chain-of-Thought strategy can significantly reduce these limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-22T15:59:44Z)
• Why Does ChatGPT "Delve" So Much? Exploring the Sources of Lexical Overrepresentation in Large Language Models [0.0]
  It is widely assumed that scientists' use of large language models (LLMs) is responsible for language change. We develop a formal, transferable method to characterize these linguistic changes. We find 21 focal words whose increased occurrence in scientific abstracts is likely the result of LLM usage. We assess whether reinforcement learning from human feedback contributes to the overuse of focal words.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T02:27:59Z)
• Combating Multimodal LLM Hallucination via Bottom-Up Holistic Reasoning [151.4060202671114]
  multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown unprecedented capabilities in advancing vision-language tasks. This paper introduces a novel bottom-up reasoning framework to address hallucinations in MLLMs. Our framework systematically addresses potential issues in both visual and textual inputs by verifying and integrating perception-level information with cognition-level commonsense knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-15T09:10:46Z)
• A Debate-Driven Experiment on LLM Hallucinations and Accuracy [7.821303946741665]
  This study investigates the phenomenon of hallucination in large language models (LLMs) Multiple instances of GPT-4o-Mini models engage in a debate-like interaction prompted with questions from the TruthfulQA dataset. One model is deliberately instructed to generate plausible but false answers while the other models are asked to respond truthfully.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T11:41:27Z)
• Hallucination Detection: Robustly Discerning Reliable Answers in Large Language Models [70.19081534515371]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained widespread adoption in various natural language processing tasks. They generate unfaithful or inconsistent content that deviates from the input source, leading to severe consequences. We propose a robust discriminator named RelD to effectively detect hallucination in LLMs' generated answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T18:47:42Z)
• Understanding Privacy Risks of Embeddings Induced by Large Language Models [75.96257812857554]
  Large language models show early signs of artificial general intelligence but struggle with hallucinations. One promising solution is to store external knowledge as embeddings, aiding LLMs in retrieval-augmented generation. Recent studies experimentally showed that the original text can be partially reconstructed from text embeddings by pre-trained language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-25T13:10:48Z)
• Benchmarking Hallucination in Large Language Models based on Unanswerable Math Word Problem [58.3723958800254]
  Large language models (LLMs) are highly effective in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks. They are susceptible to producing unreliable conjectures in ambiguous contexts called hallucination. This paper presents a new method for evaluating LLM hallucination in Question Answering (QA) based on the unanswerable math word problem (MWP)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T09:06:34Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination Mitigation Techniques in Large Language Models [7.705767540805267]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to advance in their ability to write human-like text. A key challenge remains around their tendency to hallucinate generating content that appears factual but is ungrounded. This paper presents a survey of over 32 techniques developed to mitigate hallucination in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T17:56:30Z)
• Enhancing Uncertainty-Based Hallucination Detection with Stronger Focus [99.33091772494751]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained significant popularity for their impressive performance across diverse fields. LLMs are prone to hallucinate untruthful or nonsensical outputs that fail to meet user expectations. We propose a novel reference-free, uncertainty-based method for detecting hallucinations in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T08:39:17Z)
• Zero-Resource Hallucination Prevention for Large Language Models [45.4155729393135]
  "Hallucination" refers to instances where large language models (LLMs) generate factually inaccurate or ungrounded information. We introduce a novel pre-language self-evaluation technique, referred to as SELF-FAMILIARITY, which focuses on evaluating the model's familiarity with the concepts present in the input instruction. We validate SELF-FAMILIARITY across four different large language models, demonstrating consistently superior performance compared to existing techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-06T01:57:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.