Deep Learning Based Tool Wear Estimation Considering Cutting Conditions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.01199v1
• Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 11:48:33 GMT
• Title: Deep Learning Based Tool Wear Estimation Considering Cutting Conditions
• Authors: Zongshuo Li, Markus Meurer, Thomas Bergs,
• Abstract summary: We propose a deep learning approach based on a convolutional neural network that incorporates cutting conditions as extra model inputs. We evaluate the model's performance in terms of tool wear estimation accuracy and its transferability to new fixed or variable cutting parameters.
• Score: 0.18206461789819073
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Tool wear conditions impact the final quality of the workpiece. In this study, we propose a deep learning approach based on a convolutional neural network that incorporates cutting conditions as extra model inputs, aiming to improve tool wear estimation accuracy and fulfill industrial demands for zero-shot transferability. Through a series of milling experiments under various cutting parameters, we evaluate the model's performance in terms of tool wear estimation accuracy and its transferability to new fixed or variable cutting parameters. The results consistently highlight our approach's advantage over conventional models that omit cutting conditions, maintaining superior performance irrespective of the stability of the wear development or the limitation of the training dataset. This finding underscores its potential applicability in industrial scenarios.

Related papers

• Contrastive Knowledge Transfer and Robust Optimization for Secure Alignment of Large Language Models [9.353236468990945]
  This paper addresses the limitations of large-scale language models in safety alignment and robustness.<n>It proposes a fine-tuning method that combines contrastive distillation with noise-robust training.<n>Results show that the method significantly outperforms existing baselines in knowledge transfer, robustness, and overall safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-31T00:54:33Z)
• ARISE: An Adaptive Resolution-Aware Metric for Test-Time Scaling Evaluation in Large Reasoning Models [102.4511331368587]
  ARISE (Adaptive Resolution-aware Scaling Evaluation) is a novel metric designed to assess the test-time scaling effectiveness of large reasoning models.<n>We conduct comprehensive experiments evaluating state-of-the-art reasoning models across diverse domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T15:10:51Z)
• Calibration Meets Reality: Making Machine Learning Predictions Trustworthy [2.1485350418225244]
  Post-hoc calibration methods are widely used to improve the reliability of probabilistic predictions from machine learning models.<n>We present a theoretical analysis of post-hoc calibration methods, focusing on Platt scaling and isotonic regression.<n>We also explore the impact of feature informativeness on calibration performance through controlled synthetic experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-28T06:04:56Z)
• Analysis of Transferability Estimation Metrics for Surgical Phase Recognition [3.3285108719932555]
  Fine-tuning pre-trained models has become a cornerstone of modern machine learning, allowing practitioners to achieve high performance with limited labeled data.<n>In surgical video analysis, where expert annotations are especially time-consuming and costly, identifying the most suitable pre-trained model for a downstream task is both critical and challenging.<n>We provide the first comprehensive benchmark of three representative metrics, LogME, H-Score, and TransRate, on two diverse datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-22T18:05:33Z)
• Feedback-Driven Tool-Use Improvements in Large Language Models via Automated Build Environments [70.42705564227548]
  We propose an automated environment construction pipeline for large language models (LLMs)<n>This enables the creation of high-quality training environments that provide detailed and measurable feedback without relying on external tools.<n>We also introduce a verifiable reward mechanism that evaluates both the precision of tool use and the completeness of task execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T09:45:19Z)
• Meta Learning-Driven Iterative Refinement for Robust Anomaly Detection in Industrial Inspection [9.132399905884364]
  We propose to leverage the adaptation ability of meta learning approaches to identify and reject noisy training data to improve the learning process. In our model, we employ Model Agnostic Meta Learning (MAML) and an iterative refinement process through an Inter-Quartile Range rejection scheme to enhance their adaptability and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T14:11:41Z)
• Data-driven tool wear prediction in milling, based on a process-integrated single-sensor approach [1.6574413179773764]
  This study explores data-driven methods, in particular deep learning, for tool wear prediction. It investigates the transferability of predictive models using minimal training data, validated across two processes. The ConvNeXt model has an exceptional performance, achieving 99.1% accuracy in identifying tool wear.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-27T23:10:32Z)
• Evidential time-to-event prediction with calibrated uncertainty quantification [12.446406577462069]
  Time-to-event analysis provides insights into clinical prognosis and treatment recommendations. We propose an evidential regression model specifically designed for time-to-event prediction. We show that our model delivers both accurate and reliable performance, outperforming state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T15:06:04Z)
• Explanatory Model Monitoring to Understand the Effects of Feature Shifts on Performance [61.06245197347139]
  We propose a novel approach to explain the behavior of a black-box model under feature shifts. We refer to our method that combines concepts from Optimal Transport and Shapley Values as Explanatory Performance Estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-24T18:28:19Z)
• Deep Learning Approach for Enhanced Transferability and Learning Capacity in Tool Wear Estimation [0.18206461789819073]
  Deep learning approach is proposed for estimating tool wear, considering cutting parameters. Results indicate that the proposed method outperforms conventional methods in terms of both transferability and rapid learning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T11:49:10Z)
• Low-rank finetuning for LLMs: A fairness perspective [54.13240282850982]
  Low-rank approximation techniques have become the de facto standard for fine-tuning Large Language Models. This paper investigates the effectiveness of these methods in capturing the shift of fine-tuning datasets from the initial pre-trained data distribution. We show that low-rank fine-tuning inadvertently preserves undesirable biases and toxic behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T20:43:53Z)
• On the Calibration of Large Language Models and Alignment [63.605099174744865]
  Confidence calibration serves as a crucial tool for gauging the reliability of deep models. We conduct a systematic examination of the calibration of aligned language models throughout the entire construction process. Our work sheds light on whether popular LLMs are well-calibrated and how the training process influences model calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T08:57:55Z)
• QualEval: Qualitative Evaluation for Model Improvement [82.73561470966658]
  We propose QualEval, which augments quantitative scalar metrics with automated qualitative evaluation as a vehicle for model improvement. QualEval uses a powerful LLM reasoner and our novel flexible linear programming solver to generate human-readable insights. We demonstrate that leveraging its insights, for example, improves the absolute performance of the Llama 2 model by up to 15% points relative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T00:21:44Z)
• Making informed decisions in cutting tool maintenance in milling: A KNN based model agnostic approach [0.0]
  This research paper presents a KNN based white box model, which allows us to dive deep into how the model performs the classification and how it prioritizes the different features included. This approach helps in detecting why the tool is in a certain condition and allows the manufacturer to make an informed decision about the tools maintenance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T07:02:30Z)
• Sharing Information Between Machine Tools to Improve Surface Finish Forecasting [0.0]
  The authors propose a Bayesian hierarchical model to predict surface-roughness measurements for a turning machining process. The hierarchical model is compared to multiple independent Bayesian linear regression models to showcase the benefits of partial pooling in a machining setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T15:44:35Z)
• Learning Objective-Specific Active Learning Strategies with Attentive Neural Processes [72.75421975804132]
  Learning Active Learning (LAL) suggests to learn the active learning strategy itself, allowing it to adapt to the given setting. We propose a novel LAL method for classification that exploits symmetry and independence properties of the active learning problem. Our approach is based on learning from a myopic oracle, which gives our model the ability to adapt to non-standard objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-11T14:16:37Z)
• SynBench: Task-Agnostic Benchmarking of Pretrained Representations using Synthetic Data [78.21197488065177]
  Recent success in fine-tuning large models, that are pretrained on broad data at scale, on downstream tasks has led to a significant paradigm shift in deep learning. This paper proposes a new task-agnostic framework, textitSynBench, to measure the quality of pretrained representations using synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-06T15:25:00Z)
• Diagnostic Tool for Out-of-Sample Model Evaluation [12.44615656370048]
  We consider the use of a finite calibration data set to characterize the future, out-of-sample losses of a model. We propose a simple model diagnostic tool that provides finite-sample guarantees under weak assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-22T11:13:18Z)
• Post-hoc Models for Performance Estimation of Machine Learning Inference [22.977047604404884]
  Estimating how well a machine learning model performs during inference is critical in a variety of scenarios. We systematically generalize performance estimation to a diverse set of metrics and scenarios. We find that proposed post-hoc models consistently outperform the standard confidence baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-06T02:20:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.