Towards Explainable Network Intrusion Detection using Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.04342v1
• Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 09:59:30 GMT
• Title: Towards Explainable Network Intrusion Detection using Large Language Models
• Authors: Paul R. B. Houssel, Priyanka Singh, Siamak Layeghy, Marius Portmann,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionised natural language processing tasks, particularly as chat agents. This paper examines the feasibility of employing LLMs as a Network Intrusion Detection System (NIDS) Preliminary exploration shows that LLMs are unfit for the detection of Malicious NetFlows. Most promisingly, these exhibit significant potential as complementary agents in NIDS, particularly in providing explanations and aiding in threat response when integrated with Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) and function calling capabilities.
• Score: 3.8436076642278745
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionised natural language processing tasks, particularly as chat agents. However, their applicability to threat detection problems remains unclear. This paper examines the feasibility of employing LLMs as a Network Intrusion Detection System (NIDS), despite their high computational requirements, primarily for the sake of explainability. Furthermore, considerable resources have been invested in developing LLMs, and they may offer utility for NIDS. Current state-of-the-art NIDS rely on artificial benchmarking datasets, resulting in skewed performance when applied to real-world networking environments. Therefore, we compare the GPT-4 and LLama3 models against traditional architectures and transformer-based models to assess their ability to detect malicious NetFlows without depending on artificially skewed datasets, but solely on their vast pre-trained acquired knowledge. Our results reveal that, although LLMs struggle with precise attack detection, they hold significant potential for a path towards explainable NIDS. Our preliminary exploration shows that LLMs are unfit for the detection of Malicious NetFlows. Most promisingly, however, these exhibit significant potential as complementary agents in NIDS, particularly in providing explanations and aiding in threat response when integrated with Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) and function calling capabilities.

Related papers

• Leveraging Large Language Models for Wireless Symbol Detection via In-Context Learning [29.28683810366379]
  We propose to leverage the in-context learning ability (a.k.a. prompting) of large language models (LLMs) to solve wireless tasks in the low data regime without any training or fine-tuning. Our results reveal that using LLMs via ICL methods generally outperforms traditional DNNs on the symbol demodulation task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T17:19:20Z)
• Detecting and Understanding Vulnerabilities in Language Models via Mechanistic Interpretability [44.99833362998488]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance across a wide range of tasks. LLMs in particular are known to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where an imperceptible change to the input can mislead the output of the model. We propose a method, based on Mechanistic Interpretability (MI) techniques, to guide this process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-29T09:55:34Z)
• Exploring Automatic Cryptographic API Misuse Detection in the Era of LLMs [60.32717556756674]
  This paper introduces a systematic evaluation framework to assess Large Language Models in detecting cryptographic misuses. Our in-depth analysis of 11,940 LLM-generated reports highlights that the inherent instabilities in LLMs can lead to over half of the reports being false positives. The optimized approach achieves a remarkable detection rate of nearly 90%, surpassing traditional methods and uncovering previously unknown misuses in established benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T15:31:26Z)
• Large Language Models can Deliver Accurate and Interpretable Time Series Anomaly Detection [34.40206965758026]
  Time series anomaly detection (TSAD) plays a crucial role in various industries by identifying atypical patterns that deviate from standard trends. Traditional TSAD models, which often rely on deep learning, require extensive training data and operate as black boxes. We propose LLMAD, a novel TSAD method that employs Large Language Models (LLMs) to deliver accurate and interpretable TSAD results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T09:07:02Z)
• Unveiling the Misuse Potential of Base Large Language Models via In-Context Learning [61.2224355547598]
  Open-sourcing of large language models (LLMs) accelerates application development, innovation, and scientific progress. Our investigation exposes a critical oversight in this belief. By deploying carefully designed demonstrations, our research demonstrates that base LLMs could effectively interpret and execute malicious instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T13:22:54Z)
• Reliable, Adaptable, and Attributable Language Models with Retrieval [144.26890121729514]
  Parametric language models (LMs) are trained on vast amounts of web data. They face practical challenges such as hallucinations, difficulty in adapting to new data distributions, and a lack of verifiability. We advocate for retrieval-augmented LMs to replace parametric LMs as the next generation of LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T18:22:33Z)
• X-CBA: Explainability Aided CatBoosted Anomal-E for Intrusion Detection System [2.556190321164248]
  Using machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models in Intrusion Detection Systems has led to a trust deficit due to their non-transparent decision-making. This paper introduces a novel Explainable IDS approach, called X-CBA, that leverages the structural advantages of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to effectively process network traffic data. Our approach achieves high accuracy with 99.47% in threat detection and provides clear, actionable explanations of its analytical outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T18:29:16Z)
• Are Large Language Models Really Robust to Word-Level Perturbations? [68.60618778027694]
  We propose a novel rational evaluation approach that leverages pre-trained reward models as diagnostic tools. Longer conversations manifest the comprehensive grasp of language models in terms of their proficiency in understanding questions. Our results demonstrate that LLMs frequently exhibit vulnerability to word-level perturbations that are commonplace in daily language usage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T09:23:46Z)
• SoK: Realistic Adversarial Attacks and Defenses for Intelligent Network Intrusion Detection [0.0]
  This paper consolidates and summarizes the state-of-the-art adversarial learning approaches that can generate realistic examples. It defines the fundamental properties that are required for an adversarial example to be realistic. It provides guidelines for researchers to ensure that their future experiments are adequate for a real communication network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-13T17:23:36Z)
• Self-Checker: Plug-and-Play Modules for Fact-Checking with Large Language Models [75.75038268227554]
  Self-Checker is a framework comprising a set of plug-and-play modules that facilitate fact-checking. This framework provides a fast and efficient way to construct fact-checking systems in low-resource environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T01:46:07Z)
• On the Risk of Misinformation Pollution with Large Language Models [127.1107824751703]
  We investigate the potential misuse of modern Large Language Models (LLMs) for generating credible-sounding misinformation. Our study reveals that LLMs can act as effective misinformation generators, leading to a significant degradation in the performance of Open-Domain Question Answering (ODQA) systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T04:10:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.