Enhancing Text Annotation through Rationale-Driven Collaborative Few-Shot Prompting

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.09615v1
• Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2024 05:32:21 GMT
• Title: Enhancing Text Annotation through Rationale-Driven Collaborative Few-Shot Prompting
• Authors: Jianfei Wu, Xubin Wang, Weijia Jia,
• Abstract summary: This study explores the potential of large language models (LLMs) as automated data annotators. By employing rationale-driven collaborative few-shot prompting techniques, we aim to improve the performance of LLMs in text annotation.
• Score: 12.559532596473225
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The traditional data annotation process is often labor-intensive, time-consuming, and susceptible to human bias, which complicates the management of increasingly complex datasets. This study explores the potential of large language models (LLMs) as automated data annotators to improve efficiency and consistency in annotation tasks. By employing rationale-driven collaborative few-shot prompting techniques, we aim to improve the performance of LLMs in text annotation. We conduct a rigorous evaluation of six LLMs across four benchmark datasets, comparing seven distinct methodologies. Our results demonstrate that collaborative methods consistently outperform traditional few-shot techniques and other baseline approaches, particularly in complex annotation tasks. Our work provides valuable insights and a robust framework for leveraging collaborative learning methods to tackle challenging text annotation tasks.

Related papers

• New Dataset and Methods for Fine-Grained Compositional Referring Expression Comprehension via Specialist-MLLM Collaboration [49.180693704510006]
  Referring Expression (REC) is a cross-modal task that evaluates the interplay of language understanding, image comprehension, and language-to-image grounding. We introduce a new REC dataset with two key features. First, it is designed with controllable difficulty levels, requiring fine-grained reasoning across object categories, attributes, and relationships. Second, it incorporates negative text and images generated through fine-grained editing, explicitly testing a model's ability to reject non-existent targets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T13:58:44Z)
• Contextualizing Search Queries In-Context Learning for Conversational Rewriting with LLMs [0.0]
  This paper introduces Prompt-Guided In-Context Learning, a novel approach for few-shot conversational query rewriting. Our method employs carefully designed prompts, incorporating task descriptions, input/output format specifications, and a small set of illustrative examples. Experiments on benchmark datasets, TREC and Taskmaster-1, demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T20:02:42Z)
• Enhancing Input-Label Mapping in In-Context Learning with Contrastive Decoding [71.01099784480597]
  Large language models (LLMs) excel at a range of tasks through in-context learning (ICL) We introduce In-Context Contrastive Decoding (ICCD), a novel method that emphasizes input-label mapping. ICCD emphasizes input-label mapping by contrasting the output distributions between positive and negative in-context examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T14:04:46Z)
• From Human Annotation to LLMs: SILICON Annotation Workflow for Management Research [13.818244562506138]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) provide a cost-effective and efficient alternative to human annotation. This paper introduces the SILICON" (Systematic Inference with LLMs for Information Classification and Notation) workflow. The workflow integrates established principles of human annotation with systematic prompt optimization and model selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T02:21:41Z)
• Reference-Guided Verdict: LLMs-as-Judges in Automatic Evaluation of Free-Form Text [12.879551933541345]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are capable of generating human-like conversations. Conventional metrics like BLEU and ROUGE are inadequate for capturing the subtle semantics and contextual richness of such generative outputs. We propose a reference-guided verdict method that automates the evaluation process by leveraging multiple LLMs-as-judges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-17T16:01:45Z)
• Annotator in the Loop: A Case Study of In-Depth Rater Engagement to Create a Bridging Benchmark Dataset [1.825224193230824]
  We describe a novel, collaborative, and iterative annotator-in-the-loop methodology for annotation. Our findings indicate that collaborative engagement with annotators can enhance annotation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-01T19:11:08Z)
• Factual Dialogue Summarization via Learning from Large Language Models [35.63037083806503]
  Large language model (LLM)-based automatic text summarization models generate more factually consistent summaries. We employ zero-shot learning to extract symbolic knowledge from LLMs, generating factually consistent (positive) and inconsistent (negative) summaries. Our approach achieves better factual consistency while maintaining coherence, fluency, and relevance, as confirmed by various automatic evaluation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T20:03:37Z)
• C-ICL: Contrastive In-context Learning for Information Extraction [54.39470114243744]
  c-ICL is a novel few-shot technique that leverages both correct and incorrect sample constructions to create in-context learning demonstrations. Our experiments on various datasets indicate that c-ICL outperforms previous few-shot in-context learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T11:28:08Z)
• One-Shot Learning as Instruction Data Prospector for Large Language Models [108.81681547472138]
  textscNuggets uses one-shot learning to select high-quality instruction data from extensive datasets. We show that instruction tuning with the top 1% of examples curated by textscNuggets substantially outperforms conventional methods employing the entire dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-16T03:33:12Z)
• CoAnnotating: Uncertainty-Guided Work Allocation between Human and Large Language Models for Data Annotation [94.59630161324013]
  We propose CoAnnotating, a novel paradigm for Human-LLM co-annotation of unstructured texts at scale. Our empirical study shows CoAnnotating to be an effective means to allocate work from results on different datasets, with up to 21% performance improvement over random baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T08:56:49Z)
• OverPrompt: Enhancing ChatGPT through Efficient In-Context Learning [49.38867353135258]
  We propose OverPrompt, leveraging the in-context learning capability of LLMs to handle multiple task inputs. Our experiments show that OverPrompt can achieve cost-efficient zero-shot classification without causing significant detriment to task performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T10:08:04Z)
• Pre-training Multi-task Contrastive Learning Models for Scientific Literature Understanding [52.723297744257536]
  Pre-trained language models (LMs) have shown effectiveness in scientific literature understanding tasks. We propose a multi-task contrastive learning framework, SciMult, to facilitate common knowledge sharing across different literature understanding tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:47:22Z)
• Exploring Task Difficulty for Few-Shot Relation Extraction [22.585574542329677]
  Few-shot relation extraction (FSRE) focuses on recognizing novel relations by learning with merely a handful of annotated instances. We introduce a novel approach based on contrastive learning that learns better representations by exploiting relation label information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-12T09:40:33Z)
• Constructing Contrastive samples via Summarization for Text Classification with limited annotations [46.53641181501143]
  We propose a novel approach to constructing contrastive samples for language tasks using text summarization. We use these samples for supervised contrastive learning to gain better text representations with limited annotations. Experiments on real-world text classification datasets (Amazon-5, Yelp-5, AG News) demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed contrastive learning framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-11T20:13:24Z)
• Task-Feature Collaborative Learning with Application to Personalized Attribute Prediction [166.87111665908333]
  We propose a novel multi-task learning method called Task-Feature Collaborative Learning (TFCL) Specifically, we first propose a base model with a heterogeneous block-diagonal structure regularizer to leverage the collaborative grouping of features and tasks. As a practical extension, we extend the base model by allowing overlapping features and differentiating the hard tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-29T02:32:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.