Core Knowledge Deficits in Multi-Modal Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10855v3
• Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2025 04:39:42 GMT
• Title: Core Knowledge Deficits in Multi-Modal Language Models
• Authors: Yijiang Li, Qingying Gao, Tianwei Zhao, Bingyang Wang, Haoran Sun, Haiyun Lyu, Dezhi Luo, Hokin Deng,
• Abstract summary: We examine the hypothesis that deficiencies stem from the absence of core knowledge innate to humans from early childhood.<n>Our findings reveal core knowledge deficits in early developed core abilities while models demonstrate human comparable performance in high level cognition.<n>We introduce an evaluation technique, Concept Hacking, through which we demonstrate that MLLMs do not genuinely advance toward core knowledge.
• Score: 8.461561516444261
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) demonstrate impressive abilities over high level perception and reasoning, their robustness in the wild still lags behind humans and exhibits diminished efficacy on simple tasks that are intuitive for humans. We examine the hypothesis that these deficiencies stem from the absence of core knowledge, rudimentary cognitive abilities innate to humans from early childhood. To probe core knowledge representation in MLLMs, we draw from developmental cognitive sciences and develop a large-scale benchmark, CoreCognition dataset, encompassing 12 core cognitive concepts. We evaluate 219 models with 10 different prompts, leading to a total of 2409 data points for analysis. Our findings reveal core knowledge deficits in early developed core abilities while models demonstrate human comparable performance in high level cognition. Moreover, we find that low level abilities show little to no scaling, in stark contrast to high level abilities. Finally, we introduce an evaluation technique, Concept Hacking, through which we demonstrate that MLLMs do not genuinely advance toward core knowledge but instead rely on illusory understanding and shortcut learning as they scale. Website with this $\href{https://growing-ai-like-a-child.github.io/}{link}$.

Related papers

• Metacognition and Uncertainty Communication in Humans and Large Language Models [3.0493183668102293]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in high-stakes decision contexts. It is critical to assess whether, how, and to what extent they exhibit metacognitive abilities. We show that while humans and LLMs can sometimes appear quite aligned in their metacognitive capacities and behaviors, it is clear many differences remain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-18T19:24:17Z)
• How Deep is Love in LLMs' Hearts? Exploring Semantic Size in Human-like Cognition [75.11808682808065]
  This study investigates whether large language models (LLMs) exhibit similar tendencies in understanding semantic size. Our findings reveal that multi-modal training is crucial for LLMs to achieve more human-like understanding. Lastly, we examine whether LLMs are influenced by attention-grabbing headlines with larger semantic sizes in a real-world web shopping scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-01T03:35:56Z)
• The Philosophical Foundations of Growing AI Like A Child [0.0]
  This paper argues that both challenges stem from a core discrepancy between human and machine cognitive development. It explores empirical evidence of core knowledge in humans, analyzes why language models fail to acquire it, and argues that this limitation is not an inherent architectural constraint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-15T09:47:20Z)
• Refine Knowledge of Large Language Models via Adaptive Contrastive Learning [54.61213933999464]
  A mainstream category of methods is to reduce hallucinations by optimizing the knowledge representation of Large Language Models. We believe that the process of models refining knowledge can greatly benefit from the way humans learn. In our work, by imitating the human learning process, we design an Adaptive Contrastive Learning strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T02:19:13Z)
• Can Language Models Learn to Skip Steps? [59.84848399905409]
  We study the ability to skip steps in reasoning. Unlike humans, who may skip steps to enhance efficiency or to reduce cognitive load, models do not possess such motivations. Our work presents the first exploration into human-like step-skipping ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T07:10:24Z)
• Vision Language Models See What You Want but not What You See [9.268588981925234]
  Knowing others' intentions and taking others' perspectives are two core components of human intelligence. Infiltrating machines with these abilities is an important step towards building human-level artificial intelligence. We investigated intentionality understanding and level-2 perspective-taking in Vision Language Models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-01T01:52:01Z)
• CogLM: Tracking Cognitive Development of Large Language Models [20.138831477848615]
  We construct a benchmark CogLM based on Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development. CogLM comprises 1,220 questions spanning 10 cognitive abilities crafted by more than 20 human experts. We find that human-like cognitive abilities have emerged in advanced LLMs (GPT-4), comparable to those of a 20-year-old human.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-17T09:49:40Z)
• Development of Cognitive Intelligence in Pre-trained Language Models [3.1815791977708834]
  Recent studies show evidence for emergent cognitive abilities in Large Pre-trained Language Models. The developmental trajectories of PLMs consistently exhibit a window of maximal alignment to human cognitive development. After that window, training appears to serve the engineering goal of reducing loss but not the scientific goal of increasing alignment with human cognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T07:56:36Z)
• M3GIA: A Cognition Inspired Multilingual and Multimodal General Intelligence Ability Benchmark [25.44666570272266]
  We introduce the first cognitive-driven multi-lingual and multi-modal benchmark to evaluate the general intelligence ability of MLLMs. We identify five key cognitive factors based on the well-recognized Cattell-Horn-Carrol (CHC) model of intelligence. We go beyond English to encompass other languages based on their popularity, including Chinese, French, Spanish, Portuguese and Korean.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-08T04:07:09Z)
• Can large language models understand uncommon meanings of common words? [30.527834781076546]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown significant advancements across diverse natural language understanding (NLU) tasks. Yet, lacking widely acknowledged testing mechanisms, answering whether LLMs are parrots or genuinely comprehend the world' remains unclear. This paper presents innovative construction of a Lexical Semantic dataset with novel evaluation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T12:58:22Z)
• What if...?: Thinking Counterfactual Keywords Helps to Mitigate Hallucination in Large Multi-modal Models [50.97705264224828]
  We propose Counterfactual Inception, a novel method that implants counterfactual thinking into Large Multi-modal Models. We aim for the models to engage with and generate responses that span a wider contextual scene understanding. Comprehensive analyses across various LMMs, including both open-source and proprietary models, corroborate that counterfactual thinking significantly reduces hallucination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T11:27:20Z)
• FAC$^2$E: Better Understanding Large Language Model Capabilities by Dissociating Language and Cognition [56.76951887823882]
  Large language models (LLMs) are primarily evaluated by overall performance on various text understanding and generation tasks. We present FAC$2$E, a framework for Fine-grAined and Cognition-grounded LLMs' Capability Evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T21:05:37Z)
• Think Twice: Perspective-Taking Improves Large Language Models' Theory-of-Mind Capabilities [63.90227161974381]
  SimToM is a novel prompting framework inspired by Simulation Theory's notion of perspective-taking. Our approach, which requires no additional training and minimal prompt-tuning, shows substantial improvement over existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T22:49:27Z)
• MAgIC: Investigation of Large Language Model Powered Multi-Agent in Cognition, Adaptability, Rationality and Collaboration [102.41118020705876]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have marked a significant advancement in the field of natural language processing. As their applications extend into multi-agent environments, a need has arisen for a comprehensive evaluation framework. This work introduces a novel benchmarking framework specifically tailored to assess LLMs within multi-agent settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T21:46:27Z)
• Machine Psychology [54.287802134327485]
  We argue that a fruitful direction for research is engaging large language models in behavioral experiments inspired by psychology. We highlight theoretical perspectives, experimental paradigms, and computational analysis techniques that this approach brings to the table. It paves the way for a "machine psychology" for generative artificial intelligence (AI) that goes beyond performance benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T13:24:41Z)
• Anti-Retroactive Interference for Lifelong Learning [65.50683752919089]
  We design a paradigm for lifelong learning based on meta-learning and associative mechanism of the brain. It tackles the problem from two aspects: extracting knowledge and memorizing knowledge. It is theoretically analyzed that the proposed learning paradigm can make the models of different tasks converge to the same optimum.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-27T09:27:36Z)
• Structured, flexible, and robust: benchmarking and improving large language models towards more human-like behavior in out-of-distribution reasoning tasks [39.39138995087475]
  We ask how much of human-like thinking can be captured by learning statistical patterns in language alone. Our benchmark contains two problem-solving domains (planning and explanation generation) and is designed to require generalization. We find that humans are far more robust than LLMs on this benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-11T18:14:33Z)
• WenLan 2.0: Make AI Imagine via a Multimodal Foundation Model [74.4875156387271]
  We develop a novel foundation model pre-trained with huge multimodal (visual and textual) data. We show that state-of-the-art results can be obtained on a wide range of downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-27T12:25:21Z)
• Bongard-LOGO: A New Benchmark for Human-Level Concept Learning and Reasoning [78.13740873213223]
  Bongard problems (BPs) were introduced as an inspirational challenge for visual cognition in intelligent systems. We propose a new benchmark Bongard-LOGO for human-level concept learning and reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-02T03:19:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.