ChatNVD: Advancing Cybersecurity Vulnerability Assessment with Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04756v2
• Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 02:09:07 GMT
• Title: ChatNVD: Advancing Cybersecurity Vulnerability Assessment with Large Language Models
• Authors: Shivansh Chopra, Hussain Ahmad, Diksha Goel, Claudia Szabo,
• Abstract summary: ChatNVD is a support tool powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate accessible, context-rich summaries of software vulnerabilities.<n>We develop three variants of ChatNVD, utilizing three prominent LLMs: GPT-4o Mini by OpenAI, LLaMA 3 by Meta, and Gemini 1.5 Pro by Google.<n>Our results demonstrate that GPT-4o Mini outperforms the other models, achieving over 92% accuracy and the lowest error rates.
• Score: 0.46873264197900916
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The increasing frequency and sophistication of cybersecurity vulnerabilities in software systems underscores the need for more robust and effective vulnerability assessment methods. However, existing approaches often rely on highly technical and abstract frameworks, which hinder understanding and increase the likelihood of exploitation, resulting in severe cyberattacks. In this paper, we introduce ChatNVD, a support tool powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) that leverages the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) to generate accessible, context-rich summaries of software vulnerabilities. We develop three variants of ChatNVD, utilizing three prominent LLMs: GPT-4o Mini by OpenAI, LLaMA 3 by Meta, and Gemini 1.5 Pro by Google. To evaluate their performance, we conduct a comparative evaluation focused on their ability to identify, interpret, and explain software vulnerabilities. Our results demonstrate that GPT-4o Mini outperforms the other models, achieving over 92% accuracy and the lowest error rates, making it the most reliable option for real-world vulnerability assessment.

Related papers

• CyberGym: Evaluating AI Agents' Cybersecurity Capabilities with Real-World Vulnerabilities at Scale [46.76144797837242]
  Large language model (LLM) agents are becoming increasingly skilled at handling cybersecurity tasks autonomously.<n>Existing benchmarks fall short, often failing to capture real-world scenarios or being limited in scope.<n>We introduce CyberGym, a large-scale and high-quality cybersecurity evaluation framework featuring 1,507 real-world vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T07:35:14Z)
• Llama-3.1-FoundationAI-SecurityLLM-Base-8B Technical Report [50.268821168513654]
  We present Foundation-Sec-8B, a cybersecurity-focused large language model (LLMs) built on the Llama 3.1 architecture. We evaluate it across both established and new cybersecurity benchmarks, showing that it matches Llama 3.1-70B and GPT-4o-mini in certain cybersecurity-specific tasks. By releasing our model to the public, we aim to accelerate progress and adoption of AI-driven tools in both public and private cybersecurity contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-28T08:41:12Z)
• T2VShield: Model-Agnostic Jailbreak Defense for Text-to-Video Models [88.63040835652902]
  Text to video models are vulnerable to jailbreak attacks, where specially crafted prompts bypass safety mechanisms and lead to the generation of harmful or unsafe content.<n>We propose T2VShield, a comprehensive and model agnostic defense framework designed to protect text to video models from jailbreak threats.<n>Our method systematically analyzes the input, model, and output stages to identify the limitations of existing defenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-22T01:18:42Z)
• SafeMLRM: Demystifying Safety in Multi-modal Large Reasoning Models [50.34706204154244]
  Acquiring reasoning capabilities catastrophically degrades inherited safety alignment.<n>Certain scenarios suffer 25 times higher attack rates.<n>Despite tight reasoning-answer safety coupling, MLRMs demonstrate nascent self-correction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-09T06:53:23Z)
• Towards Trustworthy GUI Agents: A Survey [64.6445117343499]
  This survey examines the trustworthiness of GUI agents in five critical dimensions. We identify major challenges such as vulnerability to adversarial attacks, cascading failure modes in sequential decision-making. As GUI agents become more widespread, establishing robust safety standards and responsible development practices is essential.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-30T13:26:00Z)
• Large Language Models for In-File Vulnerability Localization Can Be "Lost in the End" [6.6389862916575275]
  New development practice requires researchers to investigate whether commonly used LLMs can effectively analyze large file-sized inputs.<n>This paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of several state-of-the-art chat-based LLMs, including the GPT models, in detecting in-file vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-09T14:51:15Z)
• Beyond the Surface: An NLP-based Methodology to Automatically Estimate CVE Relevance for CAPEC Attack Patterns [42.63501759921809]
  We propose a methodology leveraging Natural Language Processing (NLP) to associate Common Vulnerabilities and Exposure (CAPEC) vulnerabilities with Common Attack Patternion and Classification (CAPEC) attack patterns. Experimental evaluations demonstrate superior performance compared to state-of-the-art models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-13T08:39:52Z)
• In-Context Experience Replay Facilitates Safety Red-Teaming of Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [104.94706600050557]
  Text-to-image (T2I) models have shown remarkable progress, but their potential to generate harmful content remains a critical concern in the ML community.<n>We propose ICER, a novel red-teaming framework that generates interpretable and semantic meaningful problematic prompts.<n>Our work provides crucial insights for developing more robust safety mechanisms in T2I systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T04:17:24Z)
• Countering Autonomous Cyber Threats [40.00865970939829]
  Foundation Models present dual-use concerns broadly and within the cyber domain specifically. Recent research has shown the potential for these advanced models to inform or independently execute offensive cyberspace operations. This work evaluates several state-of-the-art FMs on their ability to compromise machines in an isolated network and investigates defensive mechanisms to defeat such AI-powered attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T22:46:44Z)
• PenHeal: A Two-Stage LLM Framework for Automated Pentesting and Optimal Remediation [18.432274815853116]
  PenHeal is a two-stage LLM-based framework designed to autonomously identify and security vulnerabilities. This paper introduces PenHeal, a two-stage LLM-based framework designed to autonomously identify and security vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-25T05:42:14Z)
• SECURE: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Cybersecurity [0.6741087029030101]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential in cybersecurity applications but have also caused lower confidence due to problems like hallucinations and a lack of truthfulness. Our study evaluates seven state-of-the-art models on these tasks, providing insights into their strengths and weaknesses in cybersecurity contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T19:35:06Z)
• Large Language Models for Cyber Security: A Systematic Literature Review [14.924782327303765]
  We conduct a comprehensive review of the literature on the application of Large Language Models in cybersecurity (LLM4Security) We observe that LLMs are being applied to a wide range of cybersecurity tasks, including vulnerability detection, malware analysis, network intrusion detection, and phishing detection. Third, we identify several promising techniques for adapting LLMs to specific cybersecurity domains, such as fine-tuning, transfer learning, and domain-specific pre-training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T02:09:17Z)
• Mapping LLM Security Landscapes: A Comprehensive Stakeholder Risk Assessment Proposal [0.0]
  We propose a risk assessment process using tools like the risk rating methodology which is used for traditional systems. We conduct scenario analysis to identify potential threat agents and map the dependent system components against vulnerability factors. We also map threats against three key stakeholder groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T05:17:22Z)
• Review of Generative AI Methods in Cybersecurity [0.6990493129893112]
  This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current state-of-the-art deployments of Generative AI (GenAI) It covers assaults, jailbreaking, and applications of prompt injection and reverse psychology. It also provides the various applications of GenAI in cybercrimes, such as automated hacking, phishing emails, social engineering, reverse cryptography, creating attack payloads, and creating malware.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T17:05:05Z)
• Profile of Vulnerability Remediations in Dependencies Using Graph Analysis [40.35284812745255]
  This research introduces graph analysis methods and a modified Graph Attention Convolutional Neural Network (GAT) model. We analyze control flow graphs to profile breaking changes in applications occurring from dependency upgrades intended to remediate vulnerabilities. Results demonstrate the effectiveness of the enhanced GAT model in offering nuanced insights into the relational dynamics of code vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T02:01:47Z)
• Chain-of-Thought Prompting of Large Language Models for Discovering and Fixing Software Vulnerabilities [21.787125867708962]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive potential in various domains. In this paper, we explore how to leverage LLMs and chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting to address three key software vulnerability analysis tasks. We show substantial superiority of our CoT-inspired prompting over the baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T05:48:18Z)
• LLM4Vuln: A Unified Evaluation Framework for Decoupling and Enhancing LLMs' Vulnerability Reasoning [20.463200377413255]
  We introduce a unified evaluation framework that assesses large language models' vulnerability reasoning capabilities.<n>We test six representative LLMs for 147 ground-truth vulnerabilities and 147 non-vulnerable cases in 3,528 controlled scenarios.<n>Our findings reveal the varying impacts of knowledge enhancement, context supplementation, and prompt schemes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T14:32:27Z)
• Purple Llama CyberSecEval: A Secure Coding Benchmark for Language Models [41.068780235482514]
  This paper presents CyberSecEval, a comprehensive benchmark developed to help bolster the cybersecurity of Large Language Models (LLMs) employed as coding assistants. CyberSecEval provides a thorough evaluation of LLMs in two crucial security domains: their propensity to generate insecure code and their level of compliance when asked to assist in cyberattacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T22:07:54Z)
• How Far Have We Gone in Vulnerability Detection Using Large Language Models [15.09461331135668]
  We introduce a comprehensive vulnerability benchmark VulBench. This benchmark aggregates high-quality data from a wide range of CTF challenges and real-world applications. We find that several LLMs outperform traditional deep learning approaches in vulnerability detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-21T08:20:39Z)
• ASSERT: Automated Safety Scenario Red Teaming for Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models [65.79770974145983]
  ASSERT, Automated Safety Scenario Red Teaming, consists of three methods -- semantically aligned augmentation, target bootstrapping, and adversarial knowledge injection. We partition our prompts into four safety domains for a fine-grained analysis of how the domain affects model performance. We find statistically significant performance differences of up to 11% in absolute classification accuracy among semantically related scenarios and error rates of up to 19% absolute error in zero-shot adversarial settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T17:10:28Z)
• REEF: A Framework for Collecting Real-World Vulnerabilities and Fixes [40.401211102969356]
  We propose an automated collecting framework REEF to collect REal-world vulnErabilities and Fixes from open-source repositories. We develop a multi-language crawler to collect vulnerabilities and their fixes, and design metrics to filter for high-quality vulnerability-fix pairs. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that our approach can collect high-quality vulnerability-fix pairs and generate strong explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-15T02:50:08Z)
• VELVET: a noVel Ensemble Learning approach to automatically locate VulnErable sTatements [62.93814803258067]
  This paper presents VELVET, a novel ensemble learning approach to locate vulnerable statements in source code. Our model combines graph-based and sequence-based neural networks to successfully capture the local and global context of a program graph. VELVET achieves 99.6% and 43.6% top-1 accuracy over synthetic data and real-world data, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T22:45:27Z)
• A Framework for Evaluating the Cybersecurity Risk of Real World, Machine Learning Production Systems [41.470634460215564]
  We develop an extension to the MulVAL attack graph generation and analysis framework to incorporate cyberattacks on ML production systems. Using the proposed extension, security practitioners can apply attack graph analysis methods in environments that include ML components.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T05:58:11Z)
• Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer Security [74.1816306998445]
  Despite great potential, machine learning in security is prone to subtle pitfalls that undermine its performance. We identify common pitfalls in the design, implementation, and evaluation of learning-based security systems. We propose actionable recommendations to support researchers in avoiding or mitigating the pitfalls where possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T13:09:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.