GenAI4UQ: A Software for Inverse Uncertainty Quantification Using Conditional Generative Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.07026v1
• Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 22:26:23 GMT
• Title: GenAI4UQ: A Software for Inverse Uncertainty Quantification Using Conditional Generative Models
• Authors: Ming Fan, Zezhong Zhang, Dan Lu, Guannan Zhang,
• Abstract summary: GenAI4UQ is a software package for inverse uncertainty quantification in model calibration, parameter estimation, and ensemble forecasting.<n>By replacing computationally intensive iterative processes with a direct, learned mapping, GenAI4UQ enables efficient calibration of model input parameters.
• Score: 12.162599515682786
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We introduce GenAI4UQ, a software package for inverse uncertainty quantification in model calibration, parameter estimation, and ensemble forecasting in scientific applications. GenAI4UQ leverages a generative artificial intelligence (AI) based conditional modeling framework to address the limitations of traditional inverse modeling techniques, such as Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods. By replacing computationally intensive iterative processes with a direct, learned mapping, GenAI4UQ enables efficient calibration of model input parameters and generation of output predictions directly from observations. The software's design allows for rapid ensemble forecasting with robust uncertainty quantification, while maintaining high computational and storage efficiency. GenAI4UQ simplifies the model training process through built-in auto-tuning of hyperparameters, making it accessible to users with varying levels of expertise. Its conditional generative framework ensures versatility, enabling applicability across a wide range of scientific domains. At its core, GenAI4UQ transforms the paradigm of inverse modeling by providing a fast, reliable, and user-friendly solution. It empowers researchers and practitioners to quickly estimate parameter distributions and generate model predictions for new observations, facilitating efficient decision-making and advancing the state of uncertainty quantification in computational modeling. (The code and data are available at https://github.com/patrickfan/GenAI4UQ).

Related papers

• Uncertainty Quantification for Machine Learning-Based Prediction: A Polynomial Chaos Expansion Approach for Joint Model and Input Uncertainty Propagation [1.223779595809275]
  This paper presents a robust framework based on Polynomial Chaos Expansion (PCE) to handle joint input and model uncertainty propagation.<n>By transforming all random inputs into a unified standard space, a PCE surrogate model is constructed, allowing efficient and accurate calculation of the mean and standard deviation of the output.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-20T01:47:50Z)
• Accelerated Test-Time Scaling with Model-Free Speculative Sampling [58.69141724095398]
  We introduce STAND (STochastic Adaptive N-gram Drafting), a novel model-free speculative decoding approach.<n>We show that STAND reduces inference latency by 60-65% compared to standard autoregressive decoding.<n>As a model-free approach, STAND can be applied to any existing language model without additional training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T07:31:18Z)
• Joint Explainability-Performance Optimization With Surrogate Models for AI-Driven Edge Services [3.8688731303365533]
  This paper explores the balance between the predictive accuracy of complex AI models and their approximation by surrogate ones. We introduce a new algorithm based on multi-objective optimization (MOO) to simultaneously minimize both the complex model's prediction error and the error between its outputs and those of the surrogate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-10T19:04:09Z)
• Flow-based generative models as iterative algorithms in probability space [18.701755188870823]
  Flow-based generative models offer exact likelihood estimation, efficient sampling, and deterministic transformations. This tutorial presents an intuitive mathematical framework for flow-based generative models. We aim to equip researchers and practitioners with the necessary tools to effectively apply flow-based generative models in signal processing and machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T03:09:18Z)
• Merging Models on the Fly Without Retraining: A Sequential Approach to Scalable Continual Model Merging [75.93960998357812]
  Deep model merging represents an emerging research direction that combines multiple fine-tuned models to harness their capabilities across different tasks and domains. Current model merging techniques focus on merging all available models simultaneously, with weight matrices-based methods being the predominant approaches. We propose a training-free projection-based continual merging method that processes models sequentially.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-16T13:17:24Z)
• Distilling Calibration via Conformalized Credal Inference [36.01369881486141]
  One way to enhance reliability is through uncertainty quantification via Bayesian inference. This paper introduces a low-complexity methodology to address this challenge by distilling calibration information from a more complex model. Experiments on visual and language tasks demonstrate that the proposed approach, termed Conformalized Distillation for Credal Inference (CD-CI), significantly improves calibration performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-10T15:57:23Z)
• Supervised Score-Based Modeling by Gradient Boosting [49.556736252628745]
  We propose a Supervised Score-based Model (SSM) which can be viewed as a gradient boosting algorithm combining score matching. We provide a theoretical analysis of learning and sampling for SSM to balance inference time and prediction accuracy. Our model outperforms existing models in both accuracy and inference time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-02T07:06:53Z)
• 4D-Var using Hessian approximation and backpropagation applied to automatically-differentiable numerical and machine learning models [1.3142789604525646]
  We show that an efficient alternative approximation of the Gauss-Newton method can be applied by combining backpropagation of errors with Hessian approximation. The results indicate potential for a deeper integration of modeling, data assimilation, and new technologies in a next-generation of operational forecast systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T18:36:13Z)
• Learning to Simulate: Generative Metamodeling via Quantile Regression [2.0613075946076904]
  Traditional metamodeling techniques learn relationships between simulator inputs and a single output summary statistic.<n>We propose a new concept: generative metamodeling.<n>Generative metamodels enable rapid generation of numerous random outputs upon input specification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-29T16:46:24Z)
• End-to-End Reinforcement Learning of Koopman Models for Economic Nonlinear Model Predictive Control [45.84205238554709]
  We present a method for reinforcement learning of Koopman surrogate models for optimal performance as part of (e)NMPC. We show that the end-to-end trained models outperform those trained using system identification in (e)NMPC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T10:21:53Z)
• Precision-Recall Divergence Optimization for Generative Modeling with GANs and Normalizing Flows [54.050498411883495]
  We develop a novel training method for generative models, such as Generative Adversarial Networks and Normalizing Flows. We show that achieving a specified precision-recall trade-off corresponds to minimizing a unique $f$-divergence from a family we call the textitPR-divergences. Our approach improves the performance of existing state-of-the-art models like BigGAN in terms of either precision or recall when tested on datasets such as ImageNet.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T10:07:17Z)
• Stabilizing Machine Learning Prediction of Dynamics: Noise and Noise-inspired Regularization [58.720142291102135]
  Recent has shown that machine learning (ML) models can be trained to accurately forecast the dynamics of chaotic dynamical systems. In the absence of mitigating techniques, this technique can result in artificially rapid error growth, leading to inaccurate predictions and/or climate instability. We introduce Linearized Multi-Noise Training (LMNT), a regularization technique that deterministically approximates the effect of many small, independent noise realizations added to the model input during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-09T23:40:52Z)
• Bayesian Prompt Learning for Image-Language Model Generalization [64.50204877434878]
  We use the regularization ability of Bayesian methods to frame prompt learning as a variational inference problem. Our approach regularizes the prompt space, reduces overfitting to the seen prompts and improves the prompt generalization on unseen prompts. We demonstrate empirically on 15 benchmarks that Bayesian prompt learning provides an appropriate coverage of the prompt space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-05T17:05:56Z)
• HyperImpute: Generalized Iterative Imputation with Automatic Model Selection [77.86861638371926]
  We propose a generalized iterative imputation framework for adaptively and automatically configuring column-wise models. We provide a concrete implementation with out-of-the-box learners, simulators, and interfaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-15T19:10:35Z)
• Goal-directed Generation of Discrete Structures with Conditional Generative Models [85.51463588099556]
  We introduce a novel approach to directly optimize a reinforcement learning objective, maximizing an expected reward. We test our methodology on two tasks: generating molecules with user-defined properties and identifying short python expressions which evaluate to a given target value.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-05T20:03:13Z)
• Introduction to Rare-Event Predictive Modeling for Inferential Statisticians -- A Hands-On Application in the Prediction of Breakthrough Patents [0.0]
  We introduce a machine learning (ML) approach to quantitative analysis geared towards optimizing the predictive performance. We discuss the potential synergies between the two fields against the backdrop of this, at first glance, target-incompatibility. We are providing a hands-on predictive modeling introduction for a quantitative social science audience while aiming at demystifying computer science jargon.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-30T13:06:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.