Multimodal Learning with Uncertainty Quantification based on Discounted Belief Fusion

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.18024v1
• Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 22:37:18 GMT
• Title: Multimodal Learning with Uncertainty Quantification based on Discounted Belief Fusion
• Authors: Grigor Bezirganyan, Sana Sellami, Laure Berti-Équille, Sébastien Fournier,
• Abstract summary: Multimodal AI models are increasingly used in fields like healthcare, finance, and autonomous driving. Uncertainty arising from noise, insufficient evidence, or conflicts between modalities is crucial for reliable decision-making. We propose a novel multimodal learning method with order-invariant evidence fusion and introduce a conflict-based discounting mechanism.
• Score: 3.66486428341988
• License:
• Abstract: Multimodal AI models are increasingly used in fields like healthcare, finance, and autonomous driving, where information is drawn from multiple sources or modalities such as images, texts, audios, videos. However, effectively managing uncertainty - arising from noise, insufficient evidence, or conflicts between modalities - is crucial for reliable decision-making. Current uncertainty-aware ML methods leveraging, for example, evidence averaging, or evidence accumulation underestimate uncertainties in high-conflict scenarios. Moreover, the state-of-the-art evidence averaging strategy struggles with non-associativity and fails to scale to multiple modalities. To address these challenges, we propose a novel multimodal learning method with order-invariant evidence fusion and introduce a conflict-based discounting mechanism that reallocates uncertain mass when unreliable modalities are detected. We provide both theoretical analysis and experimental validation, demonstrating that unlike the previous work, the proposed approach effectively distinguishes between conflicting and non-conflicting samples based on the provided uncertainty estimates, and outperforms the previous models in uncertainty-based conflict detection.

Related papers

• Latent Distribution Decoupling: A Probabilistic Framework for Uncertainty-Aware Multimodal Emotion Recognition [7.25361375272096]
  Multimodal multi-label emotion recognition aims to identify the concurrent presence of multiple emotions in multimodal data. Existing studies overlook the impact of textbfaleatoric uncertainty, which is the inherent noise in the multimodal data. This paper proposes Latent emotional Distribution Decomposition with Uncertainty perception framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T18:53:23Z)
• Reducing Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty through Multi-modal Data Acquisition [5.468547489755107]
  This paper introduces an innovative data acquisition framework where uncertainty disentanglement leads to actionable decisions. The main hypothesis is that aleatoric uncertainty decreases as the number of modalities increases. We provide proof-of-concept implementations on two multi-modal datasets to showcase our data acquisition framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T11:05:59Z)
• Uncertainty Quantification via Hölder Divergence for Multi-View Representation Learning [18.419742575630217]
  This paper introduces a novel algorithm based on H"older Divergence (HD) to enhance the reliability of multi-view learning. Through the Dempster-Shafer theory, integration of uncertainty from different modalities, thereby generating a comprehensive result. Mathematically, HD proves to better measure the distance'' between real data distribution and predictive distribution of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T04:29:44Z)
• Confidence-aware multi-modality learning for eye disease screening [58.861421804458395]
  We propose a novel multi-modality evidential fusion pipeline for eye disease screening. It provides a measure of confidence for each modality and elegantly integrates the multi-modality information. Experimental results on both public and internal datasets demonstrate that our model excels in robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T13:27:30Z)
• One step closer to unbiased aleatoric uncertainty estimation [71.55174353766289]
  We propose a new estimation method by actively de-noising the observed data. By conducting a broad range of experiments, we demonstrate that our proposed approach provides a much closer approximation to the actual data uncertainty than the standard method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-16T14:59:11Z)
• Calibrating Multimodal Learning [94.65232214643436]
  We propose a novel regularization technique, i.e., Calibrating Multimodal Learning (CML) regularization, to calibrate the predictive confidence of previous methods. This technique could be flexibly equipped by existing models and improve the performance in terms of confidence calibration, classification accuracy, and model robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-02T04:29:57Z)
• Cross-Attention is Not Enough: Incongruity-Aware Dynamic Hierarchical Fusion for Multimodal Affect Recognition [69.32305810128994]
  Incongruity between modalities poses a challenge for multimodal fusion, especially in affect recognition. We propose the Hierarchical Crossmodal Transformer with Dynamic Modality Gating (HCT-DMG), a lightweight incongruity-aware model. HCT-DMG: 1) outperforms previous multimodal models with a reduced size of approximately 0.8M parameters; 2) recognizes hard samples where incongruity makes affect recognition difficult; 3) mitigates the incongruity at the latent level in crossmodal attention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T01:24:15Z)
• Reliable Multimodality Eye Disease Screening via Mixture of Student's t Distributions [49.4545260500952]
  We introduce a novel multimodality evidential fusion pipeline for eye disease screening, EyeMoSt. Our model estimates both local uncertainty for unimodality and global uncertainty for the fusion modality to produce reliable classification results. Our experimental findings on both public and in-house datasets show that our model is more reliable than current methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-17T06:18:16Z)
• Trustworthy Multimodal Regression with Mixture of Normal-inverse Gamma Distributions [91.63716984911278]
  We introduce a novel Mixture of Normal-Inverse Gamma distributions (MoNIG) algorithm, which efficiently estimates uncertainty in principle for adaptive integration of different modalities and produces a trustworthy regression result. Experimental results on both synthetic and different real-world data demonstrate the effectiveness and trustworthiness of our method on various multimodal regression tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-11T14:28:12Z)
• Accounting for Model Uncertainty in Algorithmic Discrimination [16.654676310264705]
  We argue that the fairness approaches should instead focus only on equalizing errors arising due to model uncertainty. We draw a connection between predictive multiplicity and model uncertainty and argue that the techniques from predictive multiplicity could be used to identify errors made due to model uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T10:34:12Z)
• Modal Uncertainty Estimation via Discrete Latent Representation [4.246061945756033]
  We introduce a deep learning framework that learns the one-to-many mappings between the inputs and outputs, together with faithful uncertainty measures. Our framework demonstrates significantly more accurate uncertainty estimation than the current state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-25T05:29:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.