Synergizing Large Language Models and Task-specific Models for Time Series Anomaly Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.05675v4
• Date: Tue, 06 May 2025 07:57:08 GMT
• Title: Synergizing Large Language Models and Task-specific Models for Time Series Anomaly Detection
• Authors: Feiyi Chen, Leilei Zhang, Guansong Pang, Roger Zimmermann, Shuiguang Deng,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) can incorporate expert knowledge by reading professional document, while task-specific small models excel at extracting normal data patterns.<n>We propose CoLLaTe, a framework designed to facilitate collaboration between LLMs and task-specific models.
• Score: 35.838329082429375
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In anomaly detection, methods based on large language models (LLMs) can incorporate expert knowledge by reading professional document, while task-specific small models excel at extracting normal data patterns and detecting value fluctuations from training data of target applications. Inspired by the human nervous system, where the brain stores expert knowledge and the peripheral nervous system and spinal cord handle specific tasks like withdrawal and knee-jerk reflexes, we propose CoLLaTe, a framework designed to facilitate collaboration between LLMs and task-specific models, leveraging the strengths of both models for anomaly detection. In particular, we first formulate the collaboration process and identify two key challenges in the collaboration: (1) the misalignment between the expression domains of the LLMs and task-specific small models, and (2) error accumulation arising from the predictions of both models. To address these challenges, we then introduce two key components in CoLLaTe: a model alignment module and a collaborative loss function. Through theoretical analysis and experimental validation, we demonstrate that these components effectively mitigate the identified challenges and achieve better performance than both LLM-based and task-specific models.

Related papers

• Multimodal Behavioral Patterns Analysis with Eye-Tracking and LLM-Based Reasoning [12.054910727620154]
  Eye-tracking data reveals valuable insights into users' cognitive states but is difficult to analyze due to its structured, non-linguistic nature.<n>This paper presents a multimodal human-AI collaborative framework designed to enhance cognitive pattern extraction from eye-tracking signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-24T09:49:53Z)
• New Dataset and Methods for Fine-Grained Compositional Referring Expression Comprehension via Specialist-MLLM Collaboration [49.180693704510006]
  Referring Expression (REC) is a cross-modal task that evaluates the interplay of language understanding, image comprehension, and language-to-image grounding. We introduce a new REC dataset with two key features. First, it is designed with controllable difficulty levels, requiring fine-grained reasoning across object categories, attributes, and relationships. Second, it incorporates negative text and images generated through fine-grained editing, explicitly testing a model's ability to reject non-existent targets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T13:58:44Z)
• Modeling Multi-Task Model Merging as Adaptive Projective Gradient Descent [70.66634188501142]
  Merging multiple expert models offers a promising approach for performing multi-task learning without accessing their original data.<n>We find existing methods inevitably discard task-specific information that, while causing conflicts, is crucial for performance.<n>Our approach consistently outperforms previous methods, achieving state-of-the-art results across diverse architectures and tasks in both vision and NLP domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-02T12:45:21Z)
• Tint Your Models Task-wise for Improved Multi-task Model Merging [17.496018757317824]
  We propose Model Tinting, a test-time approach that introduces a single task-specific layer for each task as trainable adjustments.<n>Our method jointly trains merging coefficients and task-specific layers, which effectively reduces task conflicts with minimal additional costs.<n>Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance across both computer vision and natural language processing tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-26T07:42:06Z)
• CoMMIT: Coordinated Instruction Tuning for Multimodal Large Language Models [68.64605538559312]
  In this paper, we analyze the MLLM instruction tuning from both theoretical and empirical perspectives. Inspired by our findings, we propose a measurement to quantitatively evaluate the learning balance. In addition, we introduce an auxiliary loss regularization method to promote updating of the generation distribution of MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-29T23:18:55Z)
• Large Language Models for Anomaly Detection in Computational Workflows: from Supervised Fine-Tuning to In-Context Learning [9.601067780210006]
  This paper leverages large language models (LLMs) for workflow anomaly detection by exploiting their ability to learn complex data patterns. Two approaches are investigated: 1) supervised fine-tuning (SFT), where pre-trained LLMs are fine-tuned on labeled data for sentence classification to identify anomalies, and 2) in-context learning (ICL) where prompts containing task descriptions and examples guide LLMs in few-shot anomaly detection without fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T16:33:04Z)
• Do Large Language Models Have Compositional Ability? An Investigation into Limitations and Scalability [12.349247962800813]
  Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for many AI problems. They exhibit remarkable in-context learning (ICL) capabilities. How they approach composite tasks remains an open and largely underexplored question.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T15:22:34Z)
• Task Groupings Regularization: Data-Free Meta-Learning with Heterogeneous Pre-trained Models [83.02797560769285]
  Data-Free Meta-Learning (DFML) aims to derive knowledge from a collection of pre-trained models without accessing their original data. Current methods often overlook the heterogeneity among pre-trained models, which leads to performance degradation due to task conflicts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T13:11:55Z)
• A Reliable Framework for Human-in-the-Loop Anomaly Detection in Time Series [17.08674819906415]
  We introduce HILAD, a novel framework designed to foster a dynamic and bidirectional collaboration between humans and AI. Through our visual interface, HILAD empowers domain experts to detect, interpret, and correct unexpected model behaviors at scale.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T07:44:07Z)
• Modeling Output-Level Task Relatedness in Multi-Task Learning with Feedback Mechanism [7.479892725446205]
  Multi-task learning (MTL) is a paradigm that simultaneously learns multiple tasks by sharing information at different levels. We introduce a posteriori information into the model, considering that different tasks may produce correlated outputs with mutual influences. We achieve this by incorporating a feedback mechanism into MTL models, where the output of one task serves as a hidden feature for another task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T03:27:34Z)
• Concrete Subspace Learning based Interference Elimination for Multi-task Model Fusion [86.6191592951269]
  Merging models fine-tuned from common extensively pretrained large model but specialized for different tasks has been demonstrated as a cheap and scalable strategy to construct a multitask model that performs well across diverse tasks. We propose the CONtinuous relaxation dis (Concrete) subspace learning method to identify a common lowdimensional subspace and utilize its shared information track interference problem without sacrificing performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T07:24:54Z)
• Task-Distributionally Robust Data-Free Meta-Learning [99.56612787882334]
  Data-Free Meta-Learning (DFML) aims to efficiently learn new tasks by leveraging multiple pre-trained models without requiring their original training data. For the first time, we reveal two major challenges hindering their practical deployments: Task-Distribution Shift ( TDS) and Task-Distribution Corruption (TDC)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-23T15:46:54Z)
• Improving Open Information Extraction with Large Language Models: A Study on Demonstration Uncertainty [52.72790059506241]
  Open Information Extraction (OIE) task aims at extracting structured facts from unstructured text. Despite the potential of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT as a general task solver, they lag behind state-of-the-art (supervised) methods in OIE tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-07T01:35:24Z)
• Mod-Squad: Designing Mixture of Experts As Modular Multi-Task Learners [74.92558307689265]
  We propose Mod-Squad, a new model that is Modularized into groups of experts (a 'Squad') We optimize this matching process during the training of a single model. Experiments on the Taskonomy dataset with 13 vision tasks and the PASCAL-Context dataset with 5 vision tasks show the superiority of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-15T18:59:52Z)
• Generalization Properties of Retrieval-based Models [50.35325326050263]
  Retrieval-based machine learning methods have enjoyed success on a wide range of problems. Despite growing literature showcasing the promise of these models, the theoretical underpinning for such models remains underexplored. We present a formal treatment of retrieval-based models to characterize their generalization ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-06T00:33:01Z)
• Cross-Task Consistency Learning Framework for Multi-Task Learning [9.991706230252708]
  We propose a new learning framework for 2-task MTL problem. We define two new loss terms inspired by cycle-consistency loss and contrastive learning. We theoretically prove that both losses help the model learn more efficiently and that cross-task consistency loss is better in terms of alignment with the straight-forward predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-28T11:55:19Z)
• Task-Feature Collaborative Learning with Application to Personalized Attribute Prediction [166.87111665908333]
  We propose a novel multi-task learning method called Task-Feature Collaborative Learning (TFCL) Specifically, we first propose a base model with a heterogeneous block-diagonal structure regularizer to leverage the collaborative grouping of features and tasks. As a practical extension, we extend the base model by allowing overlapping features and differentiating the hard tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-29T02:32:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.