Autonomous Microscopy Experiments through Large Language Model Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.10385v1
• Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 09:35:28 GMT
• Title: Autonomous Microscopy Experiments through Large Language Model Agents
• Authors: Indrajeet Mandal, Jitendra Soni, Mohd Zaki, Morten M. Smedskjaer, Katrin Wondraczek, Lothar Wondraczek, Nitya Nand Gosvami, N. M. Anoop Krishnan,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have accelerated the development of self-driving laboratories (SDLs) for materials research.<n>Here, we introduce AILA (Artificially Intelligent Lab Assistant), a framework that automates atomic force microscopy (AFM) through LLM-driven agents.<n>Our systematic assessment shows that state-of-the-art language models struggle even with basic tasks such as documentation retrieval.
• Score: 4.241267255764773
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has accelerated the development of self-driving laboratories (SDLs) for materials research. Despite their transformative potential, current SDL implementations rely on rigid, predefined protocols that limit their adaptability to dynamic experimental scenarios across different labs. A significant challenge persists in measuring how effectively AI agents can replicate the adaptive decision-making and experimental intuition of expert scientists. Here, we introduce AILA (Artificially Intelligent Lab Assistant), a framework that automates atomic force microscopy (AFM) through LLM-driven agents. Using AFM as an experimental testbed, we develop AFMBench-a comprehensive evaluation suite that challenges AI agents based on language models like GPT-4o and GPT-3.5 to perform tasks spanning the scientific workflow: from experimental design to results analysis. Our systematic assessment shows that state-of-the-art language models struggle even with basic tasks such as documentation retrieval, leading to a significant decline in performance in multi-agent coordination scenarios. Further, we observe that LLMs exhibit a tendency to not adhere to instructions or even divagate to additional tasks beyond the original request, raising serious concerns regarding safety alignment aspects of AI agents for SDLs. Finally, we demonstrate the application of AILA on increasingly complex experiments open-ended experiments: automated AFM calibration, high-resolution feature detection, and mechanical property measurement. Our findings emphasize the necessity for stringent benchmarking protocols before deploying AI agents as laboratory assistants across scientific disciplines.

Related papers

• Can AI Agents Design and Implement Drug Discovery Pipelines? [1.5848629658789695]
  Current AI agent-based systems demonstrate proficiency in solving programming challenges and conducting research. This paper introduces DO Challenge, a benchmark designed to evaluate the decision-making abilities of AI agents. We present the Deep Thought multi-agent system, which demonstrated strong performance on the benchmark, outperforming most human teams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-28T15:41:28Z)
• Curie: Toward Rigorous and Automated Scientific Experimentation with AI Agents [21.001278669360346]
  We propose Curie, an AI framework designed to embed rigor into the experimentation process.<n>Curie includes an intra-agent rigor module to enhance reliability, an inter-agent rigor module to maintain methodical control, and an experiment knowledge module to enhance interpretability.<n>Compared to the strongest baseline tested, we achieve a 3.4$times$ improvement in correctly answering experimental questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-22T03:58:19Z)
• MLGym: A New Framework and Benchmark for Advancing AI Research Agents [51.9387884953294]
  We introduce Meta MLGym and MLGym-Bench, a new framework and benchmark for evaluating and developing large language models on AI research tasks.<n>This is the first Gym environment for machine learning (ML) tasks, enabling research on reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms for training such agents.<n>We evaluate a number of frontier large language models (LLMs) on our benchmarks such as Claude-3.5-Sonnet, Llama-3.1 405B, GPT-4o, o1-preview, and Gemini-1.5 Pro.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T12:28:23Z)
• Can Modern LLMs Act as Agent Cores in Radiology Environments? [54.36730060680139]
  Large language models (LLMs) offer enhanced accuracy and interpretability across various domains.<n>This paper aims to investigate the pre-requisite question for building concrete radiology agents.<n>We present RadABench-Data, a comprehensive synthetic evaluation dataset for LLM-based agents.<n>Second, we propose RadABench-EvalPlat, a novel evaluation platform for agents featuring a prompt-driven workflow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-12T18:20:16Z)
• Agents for self-driving laboratories applied to quantum computing [2.840384720502993]
  This paper introduces the k-agents framework, designed to support experimentalists in organizing laboratory knowledge and automating experiments with agents.<n>Our framework employs large language model-based agents to encapsulate laboratory knowledge including available laboratory operations and methods for analyzing experiment results.<n>To automate experiments, we introduce execution agents that break multi-step experimental procedures into state machines, interact with other agents to execute each step and analyze the experiment results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T23:30:44Z)
• ML Research Benchmark [0.0]
  We present the ML Research Benchmark (MLRB), comprising 7 competition-level tasks derived from recent machine learning conference tracks. This paper introduces a novel benchmark and evaluates it using agent scaffolds powered by frontier models, including Claude-3 and GPT-4o. The results indicate that the Claude-3.5 Sonnet agent performs best across our benchmark, excelling in planning and developing machine learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T21:38:42Z)
• Proactive Agent: Shifting LLM Agents from Reactive Responses to Active Assistance [95.03771007780976]
  We tackle the challenge of developing proactive agents capable of anticipating and initiating tasks without explicit human instructions. First, we collect real-world human activities to generate proactive task predictions. These predictions are labeled by human annotators as either accepted or rejected. The labeled data is used to train a reward model that simulates human judgment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T08:24:09Z)
• MLR-Copilot: Autonomous Machine Learning Research based on Large Language Models Agents [10.86017322488788]
  We present a new systematic framework, autonomous Machine Learning Research with large language models (MLR-Copilot) It is designed to enhance machine learning research productivity through the automatic generation and implementation of research ideas using Large Language Model (LLM) agents. We evaluate our framework on five machine learning research tasks and the experimental results show the framework's potential to facilitate the research progress and innovations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-26T05:55:48Z)
• DISCOVERYWORLD: A Virtual Environment for Developing and Evaluating Automated Scientific Discovery Agents [49.74065769505137]
  We introduce DISCOVERYWORLD, the first virtual environment for developing and benchmarking an agent's ability to perform complete cycles of novel scientific discovery. It includes 120 different challenge tasks spanning eight topics each with three levels of difficulty and several parametric variations. We find that strong baseline agents, that perform well in prior published environments, struggle on most DISCOVERYWORLD tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T20:08:44Z)
• AlabOS: A Python-based Reconfigurable Workflow Management Framework for Autonomous Laboratories [3.8330070166920556]
  We introduce AlabOS, a general-purpose software framework for orchestrating experiments and managing resources. AlabOS features a reconfigurable experiment workflow model and a resource reservation mechanism, enabling the simultaneous execution of varied tasks. We demonstrate the implementation of AlabOS in a prototype autonomous materials laboratory, A-Lab, with around 3,500 samples synthesized over 1.5 years.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T18:59:39Z)
• CRISPR-GPT: An LLM Agent for Automated Design of Gene-Editing Experiments [51.41735920759667]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in various tasks, but they often lack specific knowledge and struggle to accurately solve biological design problems. In this work, we introduce CRISPR-GPT, an LLM agent augmented with domain knowledge and external tools to automate and enhance the design process of CRISPR-based gene-editing experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-27T22:59:17Z)
• MLXP: A Framework for Conducting Replicable Experiments in Python [63.37350735954699]
  We propose MLXP, an open-source, simple, and lightweight experiment management tool based on Python. It streamlines the experimental process with minimal overhead while ensuring a high level of practitioner overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T14:22:20Z)
• Chemist-X: Large Language Model-empowered Agent for Reaction Condition Recommendation in Chemical Synthesis [55.30328162764292]
  Chemist-X is a comprehensive AI agent that automates the reaction condition optimization (RCO) task in chemical synthesis. The agent uses retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) technology and AI-controlled wet-lab experiment executions. Results of our automatic wet-lab experiments, achieved by fully LLM-supervised end-to-end operation with no human in the lope, prove Chemist-X's ability in self-driving laboratories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T01:21:33Z)
• MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentation [96.71370747681078]
  We introduce MLAgentBench, a suite of 13 tasks ranging from improving model performance on CIFAR-10 to recent research problems like BabyLM. For each task, an agent can perform actions like reading/writing files, executing code, and inspecting outputs. We benchmark agents based on Claude v1.0, Claude v2.1, Claude v3 Opus, GPT-4, GPT-4-turbo, Gemini-Pro, and Mixtral and find that a Claude v3 Opus agent is the best in terms of success rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T04:06:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.