Understanding the relationships between the perceptions of burnout and instability in Software Engineering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.10249v1
• Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 15:59:30 GMT
• Title: Understanding the relationships between the perceptions of burnout and instability in Software Engineering
• Authors: Danilo Monteiro Ribeiro,
• Abstract summary: burnout is a recognized disease that impacts productivity, turnover, and, most importantly, developers' well-being. This study aims to identify and describe the relationship between perceived instability and burnout among software developers.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: Changes are inherent in software development, often increasing developers' perception of instability. Understanding the relationship between human factors and Software Engineering processes is crucial to mitigating and preventing issues. One such factor is burnout, a recognized disease that impacts productivity, turnover, and, most importantly, developers' well-being. Investigating the link between instability and burnout can help organizations implement strategies to improve developers' work conditions and performance. This study aims to identify and describe the relationship between perceived instability and burnout among software developers. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 411 respondents, using convenience sampling and self-selection. In addition to analyzing variable relationships, confirmatory factor analysis was applied. Key findings include: (1) A significant positive relationship between burnout (exhaustion and cynicism) and team, technological, and task instability; (2) A weak negative relationship between efficacy and technological/team instability, with no correlation to task instability; (3) Exhaustion was the most frequently reported burnout symptom, while task instability was the most perceived type of instability. These results are valuable for both industry and academia, providing insights to reduce burnout and instability among software engineers. Future research can further explore the impact of instability, offering new perspectives on monitoring and mitigating its effects in software development.

Related papers

• Interactive Agents to Overcome Ambiguity in Software Engineering [61.40183840499932]
  AI agents are increasingly being deployed to automate tasks, often based on ambiguous and underspecified user instructions. Making unwarranted assumptions and failing to ask clarifying questions can lead to suboptimal outcomes. We study the ability of LLM agents to handle ambiguous instructions in interactive code generation settings by evaluating proprietary and open-weight models on their performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T17:12:26Z)
• Human-in-the-Loop Annotation for Image-Based Engagement Estimation: Assessing the Impact of Model Reliability on Annotation Accuracy [5.862907885873446]
  This study integrates a high-performing image-based emotion model into a HITL annotation framework. We investigate how varying model reliability and cognitive framing influence human trust, cognitive load, and annotation behavior. By leveraging the strengths of both human oversight and automated systems, this study establishes a scalable HITL framework for emotion annotation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T09:37:10Z)
• Identifying Factors Contributing to Bad Days for Software Developers: A Mixed Methods Study [1.1545092788508224]
  The presence of friction can significantly hinder productivity, increase frustration, and contribute to low morale among developers. This research employed a mixed-method approach, including interviews, surveys, diary studies, and analysis of developer telemetry data. Findings revealed factors that cause "bad days" for developers and significantly impact their work and well-being.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T02:43:33Z)
• Sentiment Analysis of ML Projects: Bridging Emotional Intelligence and Code Quality [0.0]
  This study explores the relationship between sentiment analysis (SA) and code quality within machine learning (ML) projects. By integrating a comprehensive dataset of popular ML repositories, this analysis applies a blend of rule-based, machine learning, and hybrid sentiment analysis methodologies. Findings show that positive sentiments among developers are strongly associated with superior code quality manifested through reduced bugs and lower incidence of code smells.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T14:34:01Z)
• Disentangled Representations for Causal Cognition [0.0]
  Causal cognition studies describe the main characteristics of causal learning and reasoning in human and non-human animals. Machine and reinforcement learning research on causality represent on the one hand a concrete attempt at designing causal artificial agents. In this work, we connect these two areas of research to build a unifying framework for causal cognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-30T16:10:17Z)
• Seeing is not Believing: Robust Reinforcement Learning against Spurious Correlation [57.351098530477124]
  We consider one critical type of robustness against spurious correlation, where different portions of the state do not have correlations induced by unobserved confounders. A model that learns such useless or even harmful correlation could catastrophically fail when the confounder in the test case deviates from the training one. Existing robust algorithms that assume simple and unstructured uncertainty sets are therefore inadequate to address this challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-15T23:53:37Z)
• Understanding Self-Efficacy in the Context of Software Engineering: A Qualitative Study in the Industry [2.268415020650315]
  Self-efficacy is a concept researched in various areas of knowledge that impacts various factors such as performance, satisfaction, and motivation. This study aims to understand the impact on the software development context with a focus on understanding the behavioral signs of self-efficacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T17:16:37Z)
• Towards Unbiased Visual Emotion Recognition via Causal Intervention [63.74095927462]
  We propose a novel Emotion Recognition Network (IERN) to alleviate the negative effects brought by the dataset bias. A series of designed tests validate the effectiveness of IERN, and experiments on three emotion benchmarks demonstrate that IERN outperforms other state-of-the-art approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-26T10:40:59Z)
• Balancing Robustness and Sensitivity using Feature Contrastive Learning [95.86909855412601]
  Methods that promote robustness can hurt the model's sensitivity to rare or underrepresented patterns. We propose Feature Contrastive Learning (FCL) that encourages a model to be more sensitive to the features that have higher contextual utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-19T20:53:02Z)
• Improving Robustness of Learning-based Autonomous Steering Using Adversarial Images [58.287120077778205]
  We introduce a framework for analyzing robustness of the learning algorithm w.r.t varying quality in the image input for autonomous driving. Using the results of sensitivity analysis, we propose an algorithm to improve the overall performance of the task of "learning to steer"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-26T02:08:07Z)
• Towards Causal Representation Learning [96.110881654479]
  The two fields of machine learning and graphical causality arose and developed separately. There is now cross-pollination and increasing interest in both fields to benefit from the advances of the other.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-22T15:26:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.