MindGYM: Enhancing Vision-Language Models via Synthetic Self-Challenging Questions
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.09499v1
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 16:03:03 GMT
- Title: MindGYM: Enhancing Vision-Language Models via Synthetic Self-Challenging Questions
- Authors: Zhe Xu, Daoyuan Chen, Zhenqing Ling, Yaliang Li, Ying Shen,
- Abstract summary: MindGYM is a framework that enhances large vision-language models (VLMs) through synthetic self-challenging questions.<n>MindGYM achieves high data efficiency (e.g., +16% gains on MathVision-Mini with only 400 samples), computational efficiency (reducing both training and inference costs), and robust generalization across tasks.
- Score: 37.60935581067836
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Large vision-language models (VLMs) face challenges in achieving robust, transferable reasoning abilities due to reliance on labor-intensive manual instruction datasets or computationally expensive self-supervised methods. To address these issues, we introduce MindGYM, a framework that enhances VLMs through synthetic self-challenging questions, consisting of three stages: (1) Seed Single-Hop Question Synthesis, generating cognitive questions across textual (e.g., logical deduction) and multimodal contexts (e.g., diagram-based queries) spanning eight semantic areas like ethical analysis; (2) Challenging Multi-Hop Question Synthesis, combining seed questions via diverse principles like bridging, visual-textual alignment, to create multi-step problems demanding deeper reasoning; and (3) Thinking-Induced Curriculum Fine-Tuning, a structured pipeline that progressively trains the model from scaffolded reasoning to standalone inference. By leveraging the model's self-synthesis capability, MindGYM achieves high data efficiency (e.g., +16% gains on MathVision-Mini with only 400 samples), computational efficiency (reducing both training and inference costs), and robust generalization across tasks. Extensive evaluations on seven benchmarks demonstrate superior performance over strong baselines, with notable improvements (+15.77% win rates) in reasoning depth and breadth validated via GPT-based scoring. MindGYM underscores the viability of self-challenging for refining VLM capabilities while minimizing human intervention and resource demands. Code and data are released to advance multimodal reasoning research.
Related papers
- From Human to Machine Psychology: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Well-Being in Large Language Models [0.0]
This paper introduces the concept of machine flourishing and proposes the PAPERS framework.<n>Our findings underscore the importance of developing AI-specific models of flourishing that account for both human-aligned and system-specific priorities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-14T20:14:02Z) - SwS: Self-aware Weakness-driven Problem Synthesis in Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning [95.28059121743831]
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has proven effective for training large language models (LLMs) on complex reasoning tasks.<n>We introduce a Self-aware Weakness-driven problem Synthesis framework (SwS) that systematically identifies model deficiencies and leverages them for problem augmentation.<n>SwS enables robust generalization byempowering the model to self-identify and address its weaknesses in RL, yielding average performance gains of 10.0% and 7.7% on 7B and 32B models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-10T17:02:00Z) - Preference Learning for AI Alignment: a Causal Perspective [55.2480439325792]
We frame this problem in a causal paradigm, providing the rich toolbox of causality to identify persistent challenges.<n>Inheriting from the literature of causal inference, we identify key assumptions necessary for reliable generalisation.<n>We illustrate failure modes of naive reward models and demonstrate how causally-inspired approaches can improve model robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-06T10:45:42Z) - Why Reasoning Matters? A Survey of Advancements in Multimodal Reasoning (v1) [66.51642638034822]
Reasoning is central to human intelligence, enabling structured problem-solving across diverse tasks.
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have greatly enhanced their reasoning abilities in arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic domains.
This paper offers a concise yet insightful overview of reasoning techniques in both textual and multimodal LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-04T04:04:56Z) - VOILA: Evaluation of MLLMs For Perceptual Understanding and Analogical Reasoning [63.0285363282581]
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have become a powerful tool for integrating visual and textual information.<n>We introduce VOILA, a benchmark designed to evaluate MLLMs' perceptual understanding and abstract relational reasoning.<n>We reveal that current MLLMs struggle to comprehend inter-image relationships and exhibit limited capabilities in high-level relational reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-25T23:36:19Z) - Cognitive Paradigms for Evaluating VLMs on Visual Reasoning Task [3.2228025627337864]
Advancing machine visual reasoning requires a deeper understanding of how Vision-Language Models (VLMs) process and interpret complex visual patterns.<n>This work introduces a novel, cognitively-inspired evaluation framework to systematically analyze VLM reasoning on natural image-based Bongard Problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-23T12:42:42Z) - LlamaV-o1: Rethinking Step-by-step Visual Reasoning in LLMs [103.0226977561914]
We propose a comprehensive framework for advancing step-by-step visual reasoning in large language models.<n>We introduce a visual reasoning benchmark specifically designed to evaluate multi-step reasoning tasks.<n>Second, we propose a novel metric that assesses visual reasoning quality at the granularity of individual steps.<n>Third, we present a new multimodal visual reasoning model, named LlamaV-o1, trained using a multi-step curriculum learning approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-10T18:59:51Z) - The Superalignment of Superhuman Intelligence with Large Language Models [63.96120398355404]
We discuss the concept of superalignment from the learning perspective to answer this question.<n>We highlight some key research problems in superalignment, namely, weak-to-strong generalization, scalable oversight, and evaluation.<n>We present a conceptual framework for superalignment, which consists of three modules: an attacker which generates adversary queries trying to expose the weaknesses of a learner model; a learner which will refine itself by learning from scalable feedbacks generated by a critic model along with minimal human experts; and a critic which generates critics or explanations for a given query-response pair, with a target of improving the learner by criticizing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-15T10:34:06Z) - Explore Theory of Mind: Program-guided adversarial data generation for theory of mind reasoning [88.68573198200698]
We introduce ExploreToM, the first framework to allow large-scale generation of diverse and challenging theory of mind data.<n>Our approach leverages an A* search over a custom domain-specific language to produce complex story structures and novel, diverse, yet plausible scenarios.<n>Our evaluation reveals that state-of-the-art LLMs, such as Llama-3.1-70B and GPT-4o, show accuracies as low as 0% and 9% on ExploreToM-generated data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-12T21:29:00Z) - Large Language Models for Scholarly Ontology Generation: An Extensive Analysis in the Engineering Field [0.0]
This paper offers an analysis of the ability of large models to identify semantic relationships between different research topics.<n>We developed a gold standard based on the IEEE Thesaurus to evaluate the task.<n>Several models have achieved outstanding results, including Mixtral-8x7B, Dolphin-Mistral, and Claude 3-7B.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-11T10:11:41Z) - MAmmoTH-VL: Eliciting Multimodal Reasoning with Instruction Tuning at Scale [66.73529246309033]
multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown significant potential in a broad range of multimodal tasks.<n>Existing instruction-tuning datasets only provide phrase-level answers without any intermediate rationales.<n>We introduce a scalable and cost-effective method to construct a large-scale multimodal instruction-tuning dataset with rich intermediate rationales.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-06T18:14:24Z) - STEP: Enhancing Video-LLMs' Compositional Reasoning by Spatio-Temporal Graph-guided Self-Training [87.58996020705258]
Video Large Language Models (Video-LLMs) have recently shown strong derivation in basic video understanding tasks.<n>Video-LLMs struggle with compositional reasoning that requires multi-step explicit-temporal inference across object relations, interactions and events.<n>We propose STEP, a novel graph-guided self-training method that enables VideoLLMs to generate reasoning-rich finetuning data from any raw videos to improve itself.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-29T11:54:55Z) - Unleashing LLM Reasoning Capability via Scalable Question Synthesis from Scratch [54.12139707822201]
We propose ScaleQuest, a novel, scalable, and cost-effective data synthesis method.<n>By generating diverse questions from scratch, we produce a dataset of 1 million problem-solution pairs.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that models trained on our data outperform existing open-source datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-24T12:42:04Z) - Learning to Generate and Evaluate Fact-checking Explanations with Transformers [10.970249299147866]
Research contributes to the field of Explainable Artificial Antelligence (XAI)
We develop transformer-based fact-checking models that contextualise and justify their decisions by generating human-accessible explanations.
We emphasise the need for aligning Artificial Intelligence (AI)-generated explanations with human judgements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-21T06:22:51Z) - Socially Aware Synthetic Data Generation for Suicidal Ideation Detection
Using Large Language Models [8.832297887534445]
We introduce an innovative strategy that leverages the capabilities of generative AI models to create synthetic data for suicidal ideation detection.
We benchmarked against state-of-the-art NLP classification models, specifically, those centered around the BERT family structures.
Our synthetic data-driven method, informed by social factors, offers consistent F1-scores of 0.82 for both models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-25T18:25:05Z) - Self-Convinced Prompting: Few-Shot Question Answering with Repeated
Introspection [13.608076739368949]
We introduce a novel framework that harnesses the potential of large-scale pre-trained language models.
Our framework processes the output of a typical few-shot chain-of-thought prompt, assesses the correctness of the response, scrutinizes the answer, and ultimately produces a new solution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-08T06:36:26Z) - Measuring and Improving Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Vision-Language Models [61.28463542324576]
Vision-language models (VLMs) have recently demonstrated strong efficacy as visual assistants that can generate human-like outputs.
We evaluate existing state-of-the-art VLMs and find that even the best-performing model is unable to demonstrate strong visual reasoning capabilities and consistency.
We propose a two-stage training framework aimed at improving both the reasoning performance and consistency of VLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-08T17:49:44Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.